健康人人关心的话题分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/qpzeng 写“正能量”博客,做“富营养”科普

博文

上班不愉快,未必是坏事

已有 3664 次阅读 2014-8-24 06:22 |个人分类:期刊论文|系统分类:论文交流| 情绪, 工作

按常识,上班心情愉快,业绩就好;反之,上班心情不愉快,业绩就差。可是,英国利物浦大学的研究人员调查发现,上班心情不好可能是件好事,而上班心情好未必不是件坏事!这项最新研究成果8月21日发表在《人类关系》(Human Relations)杂志上。

为什么会得出这样有悖常理的结论呢?答案是必须具体考察工作中是因为什么事情“发火”。为了伸张正义而愤愤不平未必是件坏事。在某种场合,若你的愤怒因某人违反道德准则而起,那或许是让坏事变成好事的一个契机。比如,当上司粗暴对待下属时,其他员工就可以表达不满。

这样的打抱不平可能起到奇效:以后就不会再有类似情形出现了!相反,工作中情绪太正面,可能导致自满和浮夸,而不会有幸福感,工作效率也不高。在团队中,负面情绪往往导致正面结果,因为个别意见不一会让协商更细致而深入,这样反而能提高团队的效率。

有趣的是,在热心电话那头,为情绪低落者提供帮助的人,会因为自己做了好事而感到满足。但是,由于人们在社交场合回避他们,又令他们对这份工作感到沮丧。也就是说,他们把自己捕捉情感缺陷的能力归结于接线员这个职业。


Feeling bad at work can be a good thing (and vice versa)

Date:
August 21, 2014
Source:
University of Liverpool
Summary:
Contrary to popular opinion, it can be good to feel bad at work, whilst feeling good in the workplace can also lead to negative outcomes, researchers say. The commonly-held assumption that positivity in the workplace produces positive outcomes, while negative emotions lead to negative outcomes, may be in need for reconsideration.


Researchers found that the commonly-held assumption that positivity in the workplace produces positive outcomes, while negative emotions lead to negative outcomes, may be in need for reconsideration.
Credit: © mindweb2 / Fotolia

Research by the University of Liverpool suggests that, contrary to popular opinion, it can be good to feel bad at work, whilst feeling good in the workplace can also lead to negative outcomes.

In a Special Issue published in Human Relations, Dr Dirk Lindebaum from the University's Management School, together with his co-author Professor Peter Jordan, developed a new line of study, and commissioned research to further explore the role of emotions in the workplace.

They found that the commonly-held assumption that positivity in the workplace produces positive outcomes, while negative emotions lead to negative outcomes, may be in need for reconsideration. This is partly due to this assumption failing to take into account the differences in work contexts which effect outcomes.

Anger

For instance, anger does not always lead to negative outcomes and can be used as a force for good through acting upon injustices. In some cases, anger can be considered a force for good if motivated by perceived violations of moral standards. An employee, for example, could express anger constructively after a manager has treated a fellow worker unfairly.

In such cases, anger can be useful to prevent these acts of injustice from repeating themselves in the future. Likewise, being too positive in the workplace, rather than resulting in greater well-being and greater productivity, can lead to complacency and superficiality.

One article within the Special Issue also finds that, within team situations, negativity can have a good affect, leading to less consensus and therefore greater discussion amongst workers which enhances team effectiveness.

An interesting contradiction is identified in another study of the special issue. Here, people derive satisfaction from doing `good' in the context of helplines by providing support to people in times of emotional distress. However, they are negatively affected by their line of work due to people shunning them in social situations (e.g., since they might catch the emotional taint they attribute to the profession of the helpline workers).

Positive outcomes

Management expert, Dr Lindebaum said: "The findings of the studies published in this Special Issue challenge the widely held assumption that in the workplace positive emotions generate or engender a positive outcome, and vice versa.

This Special Issue adds to our knowledge and understanding of how the positive and negative dynamics affect the working environment and has practical application and relevance in the workplace.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Liverpool. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. D. Lindebaum, P. J. Jordan. When it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes. Human Relations, 2014; DOI: 10.1177/0018726714535824




https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-281238-821813.html

上一篇:激光测血糖,准确且无创
下一篇:于艳茹的论文不能认定为“抄袭”
收藏 IP: 219.130.236.*| 热度|

4 史仍飞 李宇斌 张波 changtg

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 10:12

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部