健康人人关心的话题分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/qpzeng 写“正能量”博客,做“富营养”科普

博文

“老朋友假说” 精选

已有 5602 次阅读 2012-10-4 07:28 |个人分类:科普集萃|系统分类:科普集锦| 健康, 过敏, 卫生

 
【点评】
 

近年来,过敏性疾病(如哮喘)及慢性炎症性疾病(如1型糖尿病、多发性硬化症)频发。为了解释这个现象,科学家曾提出两个假说:一个是“卫生假说”,认为环境太干净、不接触微生物而致病;另一个是“老朋友假说”,认为缺乏与人体共同进化微生物的接触而致病。

 

在昨天从国际家庭卫生国际科学论坛上发出的一份报告中,专家们认为过敏症频发的原因并非环境太干净,而是失去与“老朋友”的接触。这个结论实际上是对“卫生假说”的否定和对“老朋友假说”的肯定!前者提出已有20余年,后者提出才10年。

 

所谓“微生物老朋友”主要是指在人体不同部位(皮肤、肠道和呼吸道)栖居的微生物群落,还包括一些具有潜在致病性(慢性感染或携带状态)的蠕虫及周围环境中的腐生细菌。这些“老朋友”的持续存在,无时无刻不在锻炼着我们的免疫系统,使它既不会反应过度,也不能毫无反应。

 

在我看来,“卫生假说”和“老朋友假说”都强调环境微生物对健康的重要性,只不过前者更强调外环境微生物的影响,而后者更强调内环境微生物的影响。

 

事实上,“卫生假说”很容易理解,凡是曾经接触过的病原体(即使是乙肝疫苗),我们就能抵御,凡是未曾接触过的病原体(如SARS),我们就会发病。

 

“老朋友假说”相对来说不那么简单明了,因为人们常常忽略有益微生物的存在及其作用。这些微生物是我们从出生起就与生俱来的,它不断地磨练我们的免疫系统,让我们免于被病原体感染。

 

同时,一些有益微生物还为我们提供人体不能合成的营养元素,如维生素C(抗坏血酸)。可是,随后的打针、吃药却轻易地破坏了互利双赢的“朋友关系”,尤其是抗生素的使用,让我们彻底失去了“朋友”的保护。

 

因此,防病的关键不是“杀敌”,而是“护友”。首先应该做到少使用或不使用抗生素,让受到破坏的微生物群落慢慢重建;其次是服用益生菌(双歧杆菌、嗜热链球菌、保加利亚链球菌等)部分替代被完全破坏的微生物群落。

 

附:

 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121003082734.htm

 

Increase in Allergies Is Not from Being Too Clean, Just Losing Touch With 'Old Friends'

ScienceDaily (Oct. 2, 2012) — A new scientific report out October 3 from the International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene (IFH)[i] dismantles the myth that the epidemic rise in allergies in recent years has happened because we're living in sterile homes and overdoing hygiene.

 

But far from saying microbial exposure is not important, the report concludes that losing touch with microbial 'old friends' may be a fundamental factor underlying rises in an even wider array of serious diseases. As well as allergies, there are numerous other 'chronic inflammatory diseases' (CIDs) such as Type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis which seem to stem from impaired regulation of our immune systems. Deficiencies in microbial exposure could be key to rises in both allergies and CIDs.

This detailed review of evidence, accumulated over more than 20 years of research since the 'hygiene hypothesis' was first proposed, now confirms that the original notion is not correct.

Presenting the report findings in Liverpool at Infection Prevention 2012, the national conference of the UK and Ireland's Infection Prevention Society, co-author of the report and Honorary Professor at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Professor Sally Bloomfield[ii] said: "The underlying idea that microbial exposure is crucial to regulating the immune system is right. But the idea that children who have fewer infections, because of more hygienic homes, are then more likely to develop asthma and other allergies does not hold up."

Another author of the report, Dr Rosalind Stanwell-Smith, also from London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine[iii] said: "Allergies and chronic inflammatory diseases are serious health issues and it's time we recognised that simplistically talking about home and personal cleanliness as the cause of the problem is ill-advised, because it's diverting attention from finding workable solutions and the true, probably much more complex, causes." If worrying about 'being too clean' results in people needlessly exposing themselves and their children to pathogens that can make them ill, this would clearly be dangerous.

Professor Graham Rook, also co-author of the report,[iv] who developed the 'Old Friends' version of the hypothesis, said: "The rise in allergies and inflammatory diseases seems at least partly due to gradually losing contact with the range of microbes our immune systems evolved with, way back in the Stone Age.[v] Only now are we seeing the consequences of this, doubtless also driven by genetic predisposition and a range of factors in our modern lifestyle -- from different diets and pollution to stress and inactivity. It seems that some people now have inadequately regulated immune systems that are less able to cope with these other factors."

Dr Stanwell Smith explains the probable reasons why this has happened: "Since the 1800s, when allergies began to be more noticed, the mix of microbes we've lived with, and eaten, drunk and breathed in has been steadily changing. Some of this has come through measures to combat infectious diseases that used to take such a heavy toll in those days -- in London, 1 in 3 deaths was a child under 5. These changes include clean drinking water, safe food, sanitation and sewers, and maybe overuse of antibiotics.[vi] Whilst vital for protecting us from infectious diseases, these will also have inadvertently altered exposure to the 'microbial friends' which inhabit the same environments."

But we've also lost touch with our "old friends" in other ways: our modern homes have a different and less diverse mix of microbes than rural homes of the past. This is nothing to do with cleaning habits: even the cleanest-looking homes still abound with bacteria, viruses, fungi, moulds and dust mites. [vii] It's mainly because microbes come in from outside and the microbes in towns and cities are very different from those on farms and in the countryside.

"The good news," says Professor Bloomfield "is that we aren't faced with a stark choice between running the risk of infectious disease, or suffering allergies and inflammatory diseases. The threat of infectious disease is now rising because of antibiotic resistance, global mobility and an ageing population, so good hygiene is even more vital to all of us." [viii]

"How we can begin to reverse the trend in allergies and CID isn't yet clear," says Professor Rook.[ix] "There are lots of ideas being explored but relaxing hygiene won't reunite us with our Old Friends -- just expose us to new enemies like E. coli O104."

"One important thing we can do," says Professor Bloomfield, "is to stop talking about 'being too clean' and get people thinking about how we can safely reconnect with the right kind of dirt."

ENDS

Notes:

[i] The International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene (IFH) is a not-for profit, non-governmental organisation which is working to develop and promote home hygiene practice based on sound scientific principles. For more details about IFH visit

[ii] Professor Sally Bloomfield is also Chairman of IFH

[iii] Dr Rosalind Stanwell-Smith is Honorary Senior Lecturer at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

[iv] Professor Graham Rook is from the Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, UK

[v] The "Old Friends hypothesis" as developed by Rook in 2003, proposes that the microbial exposures vital for immune regulation are not the infectious diseases (respiratory infections such as colds, influenza, measles etc. and gastrointestinal infections such as cholera, polio, Campylobacter, norovirus etc.), which have evolved and spread over the last 10,000 years as we came to live in ever denser urban communities, but rather the microbes with which we co-evolved, and that were already present in Paleolithic, hunter gatherer, times -- the era when the human immune system was developing, in close association with the abundant microbes present in that era. Put simply, in the same way that we have evolved to become dependent on Vitamin C in our diet (something which most mammals could, and most non-primates can still, synthesise for themselves) because it became plentiful in our food, we have also evolved dependency on microbial exposure, such that our immune systems cannot now function properly without it. It is hypothesised that the "old friends" include commensal organisms (the normal microbiota of the skin, gut and respiratory tract of humans and animals) and some potentially pathogenic organisms such as helminths (worms), which establish chronic infections or carrier states. These latter have to be tolerated, because attempts by the immune system to eliminate infections that it cannot remove only lead to pointless tissue-damaging inflammation. The OFs also include environmental saprophytes i.e. species which inhabit our indoor and outdoor environments. Other scientists are now suggesting that we need constant exposure to a diverse range of old friends, not just specific microbes. The most likely explanation of this need for daily exposure to microbes, particularly in early life, is because they interact with the regulatory systems which keep our immune system in balance. Without this our immune systems may overreact, or react inappropriately, or fail to switch off completely when no longer needed, which is an underlying cause of these diseases.

[vi]. Antibiotics are relevant here because there is evidence that they affect immunoregulation by reducing the diversity of gut microbiota.

[vii] Microbiological studies show that routine daily or weekly cleanliness habits have no sustained effect in reducing levels or altering the types of microbes in our home environment. Frequent showering and bathing might be a contributing factor, but there is no good evidence of a link, other than in worsening an existing risk of eczema. The idea that we could create a 'sterile' environment in our homes through excessive cleanliness is just not credible: as fast as they are removed by cleaning, the microbes in our homes are being replaced, via dust and air from the outdoor environment, by microbes that are constantly shed from the human body and from our pets and from contaminated foods and other items brought into our homes.

[viii] Infectious gastrointestinal, respiratory and other diseases circulating in the community continue to exert a heavy toll on health and prosperity. We live in an increasingly crowded and mobile world where any new infectious agent and antibiotic resistant strains can spread easily and quickly. More details can be obtained from section 7 of the summary report.

[ix] Various therapeutic approaches are being investigated, as yet at an early stage, including trials of probiotic drinks/ tablets and low dosages of helminth eggs. Lifestyle changes which could re-establish our exposure to Old Friends range from encouraging natural childbirth and sustained breast feeding to designing/ running our homes to ensure more interaction with our environment to encouraging more sport and other outdoor activities. Increased emphasis on outdoor sport in young people, which is at the heart of the post Olympic movement, could also have a direct beneficial physiological action on our immune system. Despite growing scientific support for the role of old friends in immune regulation, we are still some way from conclusively demonstrating how we can begin to reverse the rise in allergies and CIDs though exposure to the right kinds of microbes. This means that we need a clearer understanding before particular approaches could be strongly advocated.

Report: http://www.ifh-homehygiene.org/IntegratedCRD.nsf/a639aacb2d462a2180257506004d35db/00bf50c9379c013c80257a7f0043aaa2?OpenDocument



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-281238-619040.html

上一篇:口腔溃疡很好治
下一篇:科普文章是写给谁看的?
收藏 IP: 14.215.72.*| 热度|

19 陈小润 吕喆 印大中 苏力宏 强涛 赵立平 许浚远 乔中东 刘用生 吕秀齐 李土荣 汪晓军 陆俊茜 王春艳 聂广 赵凤光 chaohukeji aliala sz1961sy

该博文允许实名用户评论 评论 (24 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-10-20 18:36

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部