武夷山分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Wuyishan 中国科学技术发展战略研究院研究员;南京大学信息管理系博导

博文

很多职业需要综合学 精选

已有 5569 次阅读 2012-6-10 07:04 |个人分类:阅读笔记|系统分类:观点评述| 职业

很多职业需要综合学

武夷山

 

《未来学家》杂志200956月合刊发表Bruce L. TowDavid A. Gillian合写的文章,SynthesisAn Interdisciplinary Discipline(综合学:一门交叉学科)。文章说:

在许多职业中都出现了综合学的身影,如系统工程师、工业工程师、作业研究人员、中介人员、“把门人”,等等。

例如,美国Georgia-Pacific公司拟招聘一位Operation Maintenance Gatekeeper(运维把门人),充任此职者需要懂技术,会经营,善于沟通,能够在本单位的不同层次上进行沟通协调。

 

原文的开头部分如下(http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-198715393.html):

Synthesis: an interdisciplinary discipline: as the professional world becomes more and more specialized, it's time for today's--and tomorrow's--leaders to embrace a multidisciplinary approach to problem solving.

The Futurist

See all results for this publication

Browse back issues of this publication by date

May 1, 2009 |

Tow, Bruce L.; Gilliam, David A. | Copyright

COPYRIGHT 1999 World Future Society. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights or concerns about this content should be directed to Customer Service.

 

Create a link to this page

Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:

<a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-198715393.html" title="Synthesis: an interdisciplinary discipline: as the professional world becomes more and more specialized, it's time for today's--and tomorrow's--leaders to embrace a multidisciplinary approach to problem solving. | HighBeam Research">Synthesis: an interdisciplinary discipline: as the professional world becomes more and more specialized, it's time for today's--and tomorrow's--leaders to embrace a multidisciplinary approach to problem solving.

We are either the beneficiaries or the victims (depending on your point of view) of a data explosion. The amount of recorded data is growing at a staggering rate, and the knowledge required to process that data is becoming more complex.

As a result, individuals and groups have become increasingly specialized in various fields. Recently, the term "subspecialist" has become part of our language. For example, the physicist specialty has almost entirely split into subspecialties such as "astrophysicist" and "plasma physicist," whose practitioners typically make little or no attempt to keep up with advances in the other subspecialties.

This trend toward greater degrees of specialization has been a natural, necessary, and generally healthy reaction to the world's growing complexity. After all, any individual or group has only a limited amount of intellectual capacity--and time--to apply to a task.

Though it solves some problems, specialization unfortunately also has major drawbacks. For example:

* Specialization has not been a planned or coordinated process, and as a result, there are significant knowledge gaps between specialties. As subspecialization proceeds, the number of gaps grows at a rapid and increasing rate because you have now to deal with the gaps between subspecialties. Consider the significant amount of knowledge available to a chemistry student, and then consider the slightly more limited world of biochemistry and the even-more limited amount of knowledge in the realm of space biochemistry.

* Specialists create unique vocabularies to allow them to communicate more effectively among themselves, but this trend further restricts their ability to communicate with others outside their specialty.

More and more problems require specialists from multiple fields to tackle them. However, it is increasingly difficult to achieve effective communication between specialists. Whenever resolution of a particular problem requires coordination between differing specialists or lies in a gap between two or more specialties, a serious challenge is posed: The individuals involved are effective only as specialists; they require a narrow focus and a specialized language to perform their jobs effectively.

The ideal solution to this problem would take advantage of the strengths inherent in specialization while finessing the pitfalls. Ideally, when faced with a multidisciplinary problem, there would be someone who could:

* Identify which combination of specialties is likely to solve the problem and organize a team.

* Motivate the individuals to work as a group toward a solution to the problem.

* Achieve effective communication (directly and indirectly) between specialists.

If enough people try this approach, and train others to do so, it will become a recognized discipline: Synthesis.

A Theoretical Basis for Synthesis

In the 1970s, SRI International (then called Stanford Research) asked some of its brightest researchers to …

 



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1557-580543.html

上一篇:英汉词典查不到(之四十一)
下一篇:更“精彩”的答谢
收藏 IP: 219.142.141.*| 热度|

26 许培扬 罗汉江 钟炳 贾伟 刘用生 陆俊茜 柳东阳 庄世宇 蒋迅 苏德辰 陈湘明 王利文竟 杨学祥 柏舟 郭文姣 俞立 陈筝 李本先 李毅伟 吕乃基 叶威源 孙学军 赵凤光 傅蕴德 wgq3867 yunmu

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (13 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-22 11:11

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部