很早以前就有了出版后评审的模式，刚在科学网以前黄晓磊的博文唐自华先生的评论里发现。杂志名字叫Climate of the Past.

http://www.climate-of-the-past.net/about/aims_and_scope.html

这个杂志的经营模式非常牛，保护创新，公正，肥水不流外人田，保证质量和宣传效果。应该是现阶段比较理想的出版模式。

In the first stage, papers that pass a rapid access review by one of the editors are immediately published on the Climate of the Past Discussions (CPD) website. They are then subject to interactive public discussion, during which the referees' comments (anonymous or attributed), additional short comments by other members of the scientific community (attributed), and the authors' replies are also published in CPD. In the second stage, the peer-review process is completed and, if accepted, the final revised papers are published in CP. To ensure publication precedence for authors, and to provide a lasting record of scientific discussion, CPD and CP are both ISSN-registered, permanently archived, and fully citable.

生物医学领域的F1000Research也是真正的post-publication open peer review。因为一直没有听说有什么大动静，所以没有像PloS One那么大火。但是提出这样前瞻的出版模式本身就是成功。倒是PloS One好像和初衷越来越背道而驰。随着稿件增多，它越来越走向限制发表提高“影响”，而没有把保护创新放在更重要的位置。

不知道什么时候生物医学领域才能欣赏和认可出版后评议的模式。可能得等到能不依赖于杂志而能判断文章的价值的时候吧。

科学网—真正的发表后同行评审挑战传统出版模式 - 黄晓磊的博文  http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-111883-610383.html