Dr Xuefeng Pan's Web Log分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/duke01361 分子遗传学、分子病理学、分子药理学等研究者、教师、诗人、译者、管理者

博文

人类每传递一代改变100~200个基因?

已有 6339 次阅读 2012-7-21 18:30 |个人分类:Science in action|系统分类:科研笔记| 科学家, 基因突变, 黑猩猩, 核苷酸, 突变率

现代遗传学的奠基人之一霍尔丹(JBS Haldane )在1935年前后对男性血友病患者的发病情况进行了研究,通过该研究推测我们人类在每传递一代,从双亲到子女(儿子或女儿)可能会制造出150个左右的“新”基因突变。
在他看来,由一个受影响的基因突变而引起的血友病发病率为1/50,000(五万分之一),相对于整个基因组中的核苷酸突变率为1/2.5x10的7次方。
后人的研究对他提出的这个人类基因突变率进行了估测,通过比较人类和黑猩猩的DNA的差异得到了如下的基因突变数: 
 
人类每代实际发生的基因突变率接近3千万分之1(相当于1/3x10的7次方,相当于每个新的基因组内积累100~200新的基因突变
这些基因突变有可能没有任何负面影响,也可能有严重的致病效应,也有可能会对人的进化产生有益的影响。
 
这种情况表明,即使没有任何外部因素的影响,人们通过有性方式生育儿女就会“自动”创造人类基因组内的基因突变。
也就是说,你和你父母以及你子女之间的基因均至少有数十个是不同。
 
假如人体基因组内含有25,000个基因,假设每一代人之间基因突变造成基因差别为100个,那么如此传递250代之后,至少理论上讲就应该没有“遗传”可言。换言之,就是一个人的第250代子孙有可能和这个“祖先”的基因就没有了十分必要的相关性(?)
如果按照基因突变率计算,人类的基因组内含有30亿个碱基对,那么每产生一个新的细胞就有可能产生一个只含有100~200个碱基的基因突变的基因组;精子和卵子融合形成2n的受精卵细胞(恢复人体30亿个碱基对),刚出生的婴儿大约由10的12次方个细胞组成,成年时由10的14次方的细胞组成。假如人体内基因为25,000个,每个基因含有的碱基数的平均值应该为6,000个碱基(1.5亿/25,000=1.5x10的4次方万/25,000=6,000个碱基;求解这个数目一定要先把非编码序列所占有的碱基数搞清楚,假如95%的碱基为非编码碱基,那么0.05x30亿应该等于1.5亿)。如果基因突变不存在“热点”,那么每个基因的突变率应该为1/5,000...........
 
 
 
Human mutation rate revealed

Next-generation sequencing provides the most accurate estimate to date.

DNAHow quickly is your DNA mutating?Punchstock

Every time human DNA is passed from one generation to the next it accumulates 100–200 new mutations, according to a DNA-sequencing analysis of the Y chromosome.

This number — the first direct measurement of the human mutation rate — is equivalent to one mutation in every 30 million base pairs, and matches previous estimates from species comparisons and rare disease screens.

The British-Chinese research team that came up with the estimate sequenced ten million base pairs on the Y chromosome from two men living in rural China who were distant relatives. These men had inherited the same ancestral male-only chromosome from a common relative who was born more than 200 years ago. Over the subsequent 13 generations, this Y chromosome was passed faithfully from father to son, albeit with rare DNA copying mistakes.

The researchers cultured cells taken from the two men, and using next-generation sequencing technologies found 23 candidate mutations. Then they validated twelve of these mutations using traditional sequencing techniques. Eight of these mutations, however, had arisen in their cell-culturing process, which left just four genuine, heritable mutations. Extrapolating that result to the whole genome gives a mutation rate of around one in 30 million base pairs.

"It was very reassuring that our application of the new sequencing technologies seems to give a reliable result and that the number we've been using for the mutation rate is pretty much the right one," says Chris Tyler-Smith of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK, who led the study, published today in Current Biology1.

Tyler-Smith says that direct measurement of the mutation rate can be used to infer events in our evolutionary past, such as when humans first migrated out of Africa, more accurately than previous methods. But before that's possible, researchers will need a more precise estimate, notes Laurent Duret, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Lyon in France. "The confidence interval for the mutation rate is still quite wide," he says. Sequencing more pairs of Y chromosomes from distant male cousins in other families should provide a more robust measurement and reveal how mutation rates vary between individuals, Duret adds.

Most of the Y chromosome doesn't mix with any other chromosomes, which makes estimating its mutation rate easier. But the mutation rate might be somewhat different on other chromosomes, points out Adam Eyre-Walker, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Sussex in Brighton, UK. Other projects that involve sequencing parents and their offspring, such as the 1000 Genomes Project, should start to illuminate how DNA changes across the rest of the genome.

"I'm sure this is just the first of many papers that will be doing the same sort of thing," says Tyler-Smith. 



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-218980-594401.html

上一篇:中国的佛莱德立希共济失调(Friedreich's ataxia)缘自基因漂变?
下一篇:龙多死靠,非旱即涝-热烈庆祝华北地区普降大雨
收藏 IP: 203.51.106.*| 热度|

1 唐常杰

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-17 19:23

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部