完整讨论请查看：

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368348000_How_ChatGPTAGI_will_break_capitalism_-DIKWP_perspective/comments

部分截取：

Congrats for your elaborations Yucong Duan

With respect to the core topic of your text, my appoach is more influenced by the work of MI. Tugan-Baranovsky. His idea in short: capitalism is not a natural system, thus it cannot be broken or die. Only human will and thought can end it, with respect to a next generation economic system (NGES), because it is a human-made system. Tech-know-logical ethics will play a key role in this digital transformation process towards a NGES, but political economy as such is much more complex, with respect to apply human macro-prudence, e.g. just think about Gorbachev and katastroika .

Dear Stephen,

If we have to treat change as eternity.

Ontologically die is a form of change if not recognized as a form of the result.

Then capitalism will eventually evolve or change or be changed to fit the digital AI economy(let's call it AI economy for the moment but maybe it is the end of current economy), till it is not the current ITSELF. This process can be accelarated with DIKWP + ChatGPT.

Tech-know-logical ethics Stephen I. Ternyik is very important and is definitely the positive direction, especially helpful in this stage.

Sincerely,

Yucong

recent student displays in Chinese:

段玉聪: Prof. Yucong Duan's DIKWP research group's meeting on Purpose Driven DIKWP Automatic Form Filling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0v8lqvQJ-K0

段玉聪: Prof. Yucong Duan's DIKWP research group's meeting: Depression and Meteorology in DIKWP Clinical

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcGgCJ8mhC0

Am not in agreement with your basic hypotheses, dear Yucong Duan

Let me resume and respond:

Then capitalism will eventually evolve or change or be changed to fit the digital AI economy(let's call it AI economy for the moment but maybe it is the end of current economy), till it is not the current ITSELF

———-—

All the tech-know-logical developments you mentioned are a direct product of capitalism=they represent the i-point of the global capitalist industrialization.

It does not matter if this is state or private capitalism, autocratic, authoritarian or democratic, i.e. the various forms of capitalism as system of production.

——————

The eventual evolution of capitalism into a next generation economic system will definitely be guided by informatization of societies and economies.

Such tech-know-logical transformations in and of economic history are generally accompanied by greater conflicts, war and continued warfare.

As the forces of production grow, the relationships of production reply with a huge time-lag, involving not only creative destruction, but destructive destruction.

———-—

This is why I mentioned the factor=human macroprudence,

which seldom reaches the heights of decision-making,

i.e. the animal kingdom often hits back brutally,

even into and with most sophisticated technical artifacts.

—————

Best: stephen

Dear Stephen I. Ternyik 

Thanks a lot deeply again.

Your precious advice is necessary for me to clarify my thoughts.

Please let me clarify my thoughts:

1. basically in DIKWP model, everything is mapped to DIKWP. I am curious anything which cann't be mapped.

2. the investigation of DIKWP models of content comprising objective content and subjective cognition, but expression will unify them as exchangable or comminicable among people or machine representitive.

3. The expression by essence should be in semantic level however it will need conceptual languages as labels of concepts instead of semantics in most cases.

4. In communication, the semantics can be seamless but concepts may shifting. The Capitalism which I used is a concept for current concept of Capitalism and the meaning of it is shifting.

During this shifting process, I would not like to see:

——————

The eventual evolution of capitalism into a next generation economic system will definitely be guided by informatization of societies and economies.

Such tech-know-logical transformations in and of economic history are generally accompanied by greater conflicts, war and continued warfare.

As the forces of production grow, the relationships of production reply with a huge time-lag, involving not only creative destruction, but destructive destruction.

———-—

but I don't know any peace will come without cost, terrible...

There is too much to investigating ChatGPT class. The phenomina of the appearance event is an independent reality and real problem besides the ChatGPT.

For example, among the lots if the pricing mechanism of the DIKWP assets which input and output ChatGPT is not ready or may forever not be ready, how could we expect a traditional Capitalism?

But I see in the come Chaos the chances. History is more Chaos in larger scope.

Sincerely,

Yucong Duan

Stanley Wilkin

• University of London

capitalism has bonded and bonded together much of modern life so loosening it must be done gradually, bit by bit, strand by strand. You are of course far further than I am, but if products are connected to the systems you advise, how would that work?

Dear Stanley Wilkin ,

Thanks.

But we are not ready for pricing Data, pricing Information, pricing Knowledge, pricing Wisdom, pricing Wisdom:

but ChatGPT class arrived in reality starts to bring Data as a Service, Information as a Service, Knowledge as a Service, even Purpose as a Service...

Not time to build the DIKWP capitalism.

Sincerely,

Yucong

17h ago

Harry Freemantle

added a comment

Wisdom and knowledge are human traits, often hard earned through experiencing the world in all its pluralities, including chance and accident. Learning to sift through data and information requires keeping critical eyes open. Generic answers may comfort us, thinking they are fair and unbiased (remembering we carry our inbuilt biases that temper our questions and how we receive the answers).

Capitalism is another matter. According to Marx it should have already run its course, but it has proved very resilient. Humans have always had systems of exchange that included an intrinsic value (shells, ochre, silver, gold, fiat and now crypto). Perhaps Capitalism will eat itself, and us, literally, as we destroy the planet in its pursuit.

We are already part of a vast neural network that is available at our fingertips (mostly thumbs). We no longer need to remember, just type and scroll for ready, pre-packaged answers. Our attention spans have diminished to TikTok time (21 to 34 seconds).

Dear Harry Freemantle ,

Thanks for your reply.

--------------------------------------

We no longer need to remember, just type and scroll for ready, pre-packaged answers.

--------------------------------------

The problem is that problem become answers through ChatGPT work on DIKWP transformation including Data-Information, Information-Knowledge, DIKWP-Wisdom, etc, increasingly avoided human participation.

Human effort to create DIKWP is not counted as contribution to the DIKWP asset creation and transfer, which is necessary production and production relationship of traditional Capitalism. Then where is out gate for Capitalism?

Sincerely,

Yucong

----------------------

Albert Einstein’s classification of researchers actually based on the human purpose which is the main character.
I am trying to use DIKWP to map human and model the communication in research.

---------------------------

This an important point, dear Yucong,
I.e. to focus on the human methods of scientific communication.
With reference to the sequence of:
Data—-information—-knowledge—wisdom,
My view is that science has reached a high level of knowledge accumulation,
But is unable to communicate the many findings into wisdom.

-------------------------------

Dear Stephen,
ChatGPT may help to identify the existence of the Wisdom and maybe accelerating the reaching in the form of Human-AI interaction.
But it is already start to be felt as betrying the employment expectation.
Maybe it is the unavoidable cost?
Uncertainty of unreason controlling or domainance ahead.
Sincerely,
Yucong

--------------------------

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_will_knowledge_automation_modify_the_production_function_2000-2050

There are heavier impacts on the production function than chatGPT and the like, dear Yucong. And yes, employment opportunities are under great fire, which makes for another great social conflict potential. Best: stephen

From:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_will_knowledge_automation_modify_the_production_function_2000-2050/13

How will knowledge automation modify the production function (2000-2050) ?

Question

Solved

• Asked February 4, 2017

It is expected that knowledge automation in the next 20 years will convert the production function from a geometric into an exponential curve; such a technological  learning curve will have deep effects on the global evolution of the political economy and especially human labor as existential activity as well as on the natural ecology.The physical input-output-function of production (manufacturing, finance, medicine) will be extremely shortened, requiring even more natural resources for capital formation, but significantly less human labor. Which new political type of social innovation  can balance this economic process of creative destruction ? Is the classical model of 3 production factors (land, labor, capital) still valid in the tech-know-logical age of automated information-processing?

Michael John McAleer's answer was marked as the best answer

May 4, 2019

The classical production model with three inputs, namely land (L*), labour (L), and capital (K), has been outdated for many years.

The KLEMS production function incorporates capital (K), labour (L), energy (E), materials (M), and services (S), and can easily be extended to include land (L*).

Other factors will undoubtedly enter the production function in the years ahead, and will modify it if appropriate data become available or can be estimated.

Yucong Duan:

The problem is that problem become answers through ChatGPT work on DIKWP transformation including Data-Information, Information-Knowledge, DIKWP-Wisdom, etc, increasingly avoided human participation.

Human effort to create DIKWP is not counted as contribution to the DIKWP asset creation and transfer, which is necessary production and production relationship of traditional Capitalism. Then where is out gate for Capitalism?

Will it be:

DIKWP Capital chain

::= Data Assets -> Information Assets -> Knowledge Assets -> Intellectual Assets -> Intent Assets

DIKWP Digital service chain

::=Data Service->Information Service->Knowledge Service->Smart Service->Intent Service

DIKWP Digital reuse chain

::= Data Reuse -> Information Reuse -> Knowledge Reuse -> Wisdom Reuse -> Intent/Purpose Reuse

DIKWP Digital Trusted Chain

::= Data Trusted -> Information Trusted -> Knowledge Trusted -> Wisdom Trusted -> Intent Trusted

DIKWP digital economic chain

::= Data Economy -> Information Economy -> Knowledge Economy -> Smart Economy -> Intent Economy

......

How ChatGPT/AIGC will break capitalism -DIKWP perspective, February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29540.24965

Project: DIKWP: Semantic Computation-Existence Computation-Essence Computation-Cognitive Computation

Yucong Duan

ChatGPT/AIGC怎么会打破资本主义-DIKWP数字经济视角

段玉聪（Yucong Duan）

DIKWP research group, Hainan University

duanyucong@hotmail.com

ChatGPT将对数字化经济中的数字物质基础数据资产(Data Capital)、信息资产(Information Capital)、知识资产(Knowledge Capital)、智慧资产(Wisdom Capital)、意图资产(Purpose Capital)：

DIKWP 资产链

::=数据资产->信息资产->知识资产->智慧资产->意图资产

参见： DIKWP数字经济学12链之数字资产链:数据资产-信息资产-知识资产-智慧资产-意图资产

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1366640.html或https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366028601_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_Capital_ChainData_Capital-Information_Capital-Knowledge_Capital-Wisdom_Capital-Purpose_Capital?channel=doi&linkId=638ecd5e484e65005be6f3f0&showFulltext=true

通过Chat交流服务化的形式将其XaaS服务化为DIKWP服务数据即服务(Data as a Service, DaaS)、信息即服务（Information as a Service, IFaaS）、知识即服务（Knowledge as a Service, KaaS）、智慧即服务（Wisdom as a Service, WaaS）、意图即服务（Purpose/Intention as a Service, PRaaS）：

DIKWP 机器服务链

::=数据服务->信息服务->知识服务->智慧服务->意图服务

参见：DIKWP数字经济学12链之数字服务链:数据服务-信息服务-知识服务-智慧服务-意图服务

  https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1366887.html 或 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366063449_Chains_of_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_XaaS_Service_ChainDaaS-IFaaS-KaaS-WaaS-PRaaS?channel=doi&linkId=6390051ae42faa7e75a0ed08&showFulltext=true

这个过程完成后：

(a)DIKWP数字资产定价中潜在打通了数据、信息、知识、智慧策略等数字资产的固定存在形式的形成存在的资产导向的封闭性基础以及信誉、所有权、使用权、隐私权等新数据资本主义、信息资本主义、知识资本主义、智慧资本主义、意图资本主义、乃至DIKWP融合资本主义等各类数字资本主义形成的必要条件。

DIKWP数字可信链

::=数据可信->信息可信->知识可信->智慧可信->意图可信

参见：DIKWP数字经济学12链之数字可信链::=数据可信->信息可信->知识可信->智慧可信->意图可信 https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1367624.html  或 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366191503_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_Trusted_Chain_Trusted_Data-Trusted_Information-Trusted_Knowledge-Trusted_WisdomDecision-Trusted_Purpose?channel=doi&linkId=6396e7d3484e65005b03453b&showFulltext=true

(b)更有DIKWP数字服务的边际成本符合DIKWP数字经济发展

DIKWP 数字经济链

::=数据经济->信息经济->知识经济->智慧经济->意图经济

参见:DIKWP数字经济学12链之数字经济链:数据经济-信息经济-知识经济-智慧经济-意图经济

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1366648.html 或

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366028613_Chains_of_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_Economy_ChainData_Economy-Information_Economy-Knowledge_Economy-Wisdom_Economy-Purpose_Economy?channel=doi&linkId=638ecfa4095a6a777406fa03&showFulltext=true

的若干特点，加上DIKWP重用/复用效益的加持

DIKWP数字重用链

::=数据重用->信息重用->知识重用->智慧重用->意图重用

的进一步成本降低，将规模效益转为全社会化效益（Whole Society Welfare）。

参见：DIKWP数字经济学12链之数字重用链::=数据重用->信息重用->知识重用->智慧重用->意图重用 https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1367770.html 或 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366216123_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_Digital_ReuseSharing_Chain_Data_ReuseSharing-Information_ReuseSharing-Knowledge_ReuseSharing-Wisdom_ReuseSharing-Purpose_ReuseSharing?channel=doi&linkId=6398465c11e9f00cda411e5e&showFulltext=true

这与我们提出的数字对称经济转换殊途同归：

“数字经济的终极DIKWP形态:从“不对称数据经济、不对称信息经济”到“对称知识经济、对称智慧经济””

参见："非对称经济学"到"对称经济学"Asymmetric Economics to Symmetric Economics 

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1365170.html  或 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365635800_DIKWP_Ultimate_of_Digital_Economy_From_Asymmetric_Data_Economy_Asymmetric_Information_Economy_to_Symmetric_Knowledge_Economy_and_Symmetric_Wisdom_Economy?channel=doi&linkId=637c839237878b3e87cf5a94&showFulltext=true

DIKWP主要12链参见：

DIKWP经济学12链汇总列表

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1368230.html

附1：

高展«全息系统论»🐝:

我感觉DIKWP要是实现了的话会超过那个ChatGPT

段玉聪:

托您吉言，我也是这么跟团队讲的，后面还望敬请您持续指导

附2：

段玉聪:

DIKWP方法与理论是我们在国际上首创的

段玉聪:

https://www.youtube.com/@yucongduan  有三个视频

兵的升变:

鄙人浅见，从目前反应来看，ChatGpt反馈的信息，对于简单问题的解答比较直接全面，但是逻辑模块复杂些的还是未能应时应景，比如对于知识产权、法律实践问题的解答，现实中不仅仅照搬一部分法条，还是需要理论基础为主，熟悉背后原理，采取合适的策略及处理方法。

兵的升变:

但是不可否认，ChatGpt对于信息的去噪处理相当出色，可以完整接受不同表达甚至不同语言输入的信息，而且数据库非常强大，逻辑算法比较完整，输出信息还是比较符合人们的语言习惯，但是信息传输速度有待提升，逻辑模块有待完善。

兵的升变:

由此可见，ChatGpt的生成是人类AI的的必然结果，虽然还处于初级阶段，但是以后类似的发展将不可估量。

兵的升变:

DIKWP的方法与理论，从测试反应看，更能够让人眼前一亮，更全面，逻辑表述更完整，接受的信息也更复杂多元，模块处理下了很大的功夫，算法也更完整，逻辑性强，完整弥补了应情应景模式，真的能实现实时对话

段玉聪:

兵的升变:

可见DIKWP完美的切合了元宇宙理论，将元宇宙多元化、实时性、融合性等特性有机统一，并且切实解决问题、处理问题，相信在实际应用后定会引起更广泛的运用，再次掀起AI应用的热潮，也将是元宇宙应用实践的里程碑。

兵的升变:

基于前瞻性如此之强的DIKWP，保护也应该是全方位的，对于AI方面的著作权保护，虽然现有法律规定有普遍性的规范，但是只能作为兜底条款，此方面的法律维权运用更应注重知识产权相关法学理论，再结合法条才能具体应用到现阶段的发展保护中

兵的升变:

也因为DIKWP的特殊性与经济影响，也不能单单只关注事后维权，前期专利权力要求等的撰写布局也应尽可能的防止日后出现的侵权、照抄，还应从实际技术领域切实保障、预防渗透攻击等黑客手段，用技术维护技术安全，甚至开展新的防护维权领域，将知识产权法律运用与网络安全技术互补融合，也是应运而生的创新领域发展研究。

兵的升变:

上面只是本人目前粗浅的简单想法，但是跟着段老师的理论研究学习，还是受益匪浅。

兵的升变:

专利的转让运用等还是需要具体情况具体分析，也是效益化的直接体现，要严审合同，确定授权范围等，甚至有侵权分析的必要。

段玉聪:

[语音]

段玉聪:

[语音] 我们DIKWP团队自2021甑卓肌�停止申请任何国内国际发明专利”，并致力于DIKWP技术创新的全社会免费推广和公开，并支持相关创新，已经在司法自动判决、气象与疾病、智慧生活等多个领域开展推广。

兵的升变:

段老师，您的大局观让人佩服，研究成果能带来的可能是长期的回报，法律维权、技术维稳等布局也应尽可能的完善，所以我也就自己浅薄的知识领域尽量为您提供一些助力，能用到的地方不吝赐教哈。

段玉聪:

段玉聪:

@张天书 多谢您的宝贵指导，期待合作共赢，做大做强

附3：

独家专访OpenAI创始人：ChatGPT及通用人工智能将如何打破资本主义？

原创 Forbes 福布斯 2023-02-06 19:25 发表于上海

福布斯：格雷格·布罗克曼说过，虽然OpenAI是受研究驱动的，但它并不反对资本主义。你如何在以营利为目的的投资者希望获得回报和OpenAI更广泛的目标之间取得平衡？

山姆·阿尔特曼：

我认为资本主义很了不起。我热爱资本主义。在世界上所有的坏体系中，它是最好的一个，或者说是我们迄今为止发现的最不坏的一个。我希望我们能找到比它更好的体系。但我认为，如果AGI真的可以完全实现，我可以想象它会以各种方式打破资本主义。

据我所知，我们试图设计的是一种不同于其他任何公司结构的结构，因为我们真的相信我们正在做的事情。如果我们只是认为它将成为另一家科技公司，那我会说：“太好了，我知道这个剧本，因为我的整个职业生涯都在做这个，那就让我们做一家真正的大公司吧。”

但如果我们真的实现了AGI，而且它打破了（资本主义的范式），我们就需要（在公司结构上）有所不同。因此，我为我们的团队和我们的投资者能做到这么好而感到非常兴奋，但我认为人工智能领域不能被任何一家公司单独所有。如何分享AGI的利润，如何分享它的使用权，以及如何分配它的治理权限，这三个问题都需要新的思考。

How ChatGPT/AGI will break capitalism - DIKWP perspective

Yucong Duan

DIKWP research group, Hainan University

duanyucong@hotmail.com

ChatGPT will focus on digital material basic data assets (Data Capital), information assets (Information Capital), knowledge assets (Knowledge Capital), intellectual assets (Wisdom Capital), and intentional assets (Purpose Capital) in the digital economy:

DIKWP asset chain

::= Data Assets -> Information Assets -> Knowledge Assets -> Intellectual Assets -> Intent Assets

Through the form of chat communication service, XaaS service is transformed into DIKWP service data as a service (Data as a Service, DaaS), information as a service (Information as a Service, IFaaS), knowledge as a service (Knowledge as a Service, KaaS) , Wisdom as a Service (WaaS), Intention as a Service (Purpose/Intention as a Service, PRaaS):

DIKWP machine service chain

::=Data Service->Information Service->Knowledge Service->Smart Service->Intent Service

See: Digital Service Chain of 12 Chains of DIKWP Digital Economics: Data Service-Information Service-Knowledge Service-Smart Service-Intent Service

After this process is complete:

(a) DIKWP digital asset pricing has potentially opened up the fixed existence form of digital assets such as data, information, knowledge, and smart strategies. The asset-oriented closed foundation and new data capital such as reputation, ownership, use rights, and privacy rights The necessary conditions for the formation of various types of digital capitalism such as socialism, information capitalism, intellectual capitalism, intellectual capitalism, intentional capitalism, and even DIKWP fusion capitalism.

DIKWP Digital Trusted Chain

::= Data Trusted -> Information Trusted -> Knowledge Trusted -> Wisdom Trusted -> Intent Trusted

See: DIKWP Digital Economics 12 Chains of Digital Credibility::=Data Credibility->Information Credibility->Knowledge Credibility->Intelligence Credibility->Intent Credibility https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog

(b) The marginal cost of DIKWP digital services is more in line with DIKWP digital economy development

DIKWP digital economic chain

::= Data Economy -> Information Economy -> Knowledge Economy -> Smart Economy -> Intent Economy

See: DIKWP Digital Economics 12 Chains of Digital Economy: Data Economy-Information Economy-Knowledge Economy-Smart Economy-Intent Economy

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1366648.html or

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366028613_Chains_of_DIKWP_Digital_Economics_DIKWP_Economy_ChainData_Economy-Information_Economy-Knowledge_Economy-Wisdom_Economy-Purpose_Economytrue?channel=doi&linkFull=638ecfa40730fa

Several features of DIKWP, plus the blessing of DIKWP reuse/reuse benefits

DIKWP Digital Reuse Chain

::= Data Reuse -> Information Reuse -> Knowledge Reuse -> Wisdom Reuse -> Intent Reuse

Further cost reduction, transforming economies of scale into Whole Society Welfare.

See: DIKWP Digital Economics 12 Chains of Digital Reuse::=Data Reuse->Information Reuse->Knowledge Reuse->Wisdom Reuse->Intent Reuse https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1367770.html

This is the same as our proposed digital symmetric economic transformation:

"The Ultimate DIKWP Form of the Digital Economy: From "Asymmetric Data Economy, Asymmetric Information Economy" to "Symmetrical Knowledge Economy, Symmetrical Smart Economy""

See also: "Asymmetric Economics to Symmetric Economics"

DIKWP main 12 chains see:

DIKWP Economics 12 Chain Summary List

https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1368230.html

Attachment 1:

Gao Zhan «Holographic System Theory»

I feel that if DIKWP is realized, it will surpass that ChatGPT

Duan Yucong:

Thank you for your good words, I also told the team the same way, I hope you will continue to guide me in the future

Attachment 2:

Duan Yucong:

DIKWP method and theory is our first in the world

Duan Yucong:

https://www.youtube.com/@yucongduan has three videos

Soldier upgrades:

In my humble opinion, judging from the current response, the information fed back by ChatGpt is relatively direct and comprehensive in answering simple questions. Only copying a part of the law still requires a theoretical foundation, familiarity with the principles behind it, and adopting appropriate strategies and handling methods.

Soldier upgrades:

But it is undeniable that ChatGpt’s denoising processing of information is quite good, it can completely accept information input in different expressions and even different languages, and the database is very powerful, the logic algorithm is relatively complete, and the output information is still more in line with people’s language habits, but the speed of information transmission To be improved, the logic module needs to be improved.

Soldier upgrades:

It can be seen that the generation of ChatGpt is the inevitable result of human AI. Although it is still in its infancy, similar developments in the future will be immeasurable.

Soldier upgrades:

DIKWP's method and theory, from the test response, are more eye-catching, more comprehensive, more complete logical expression, more complex and diverse information received, a lot of effort has been made in module processing, and the algorithm is more complete and logical. Strong, fully complement the situational mode, can really realize real-time dialogue

Duan Yucong:

Soldier upgrades:

It can be seen that DIKWP perfectly fits the metaverse theory, organically unifies the characteristics of metaverse, such as diversification, real-time, and integration, and effectively solves and handles problems. I believe that after practical application, it will definitely lead to wider applications and set off AI The upsurge of applications will also be a milestone in the application practice of Metaverse.

Soldier upgrades:

Based on such a forward-looking DIKWP, protection should also be comprehensive. For the copyright protection of AI, although the existing laws and regulations have universal norms, they can only be used as a catch-all clause. The use of legal rights protection in this area should be more Only by focusing on intellectual property related legal theories, combined with legal provisions, can it be specifically applied to the current stage of development and protection

Soldier upgrades:

Also because of the particularity and economic impact of DIKWP, we should not only focus on rights protection after the event. The writing layout of patent rights requirements in the early stage should also prevent future infringement and copying as much as possible. We should also effectively protect and prevent penetration attacks from the actual technical field. Such as hacking methods, using technology to maintain technical security, and even developing a new field of protection and rights protection, and combining the application of intellectual property law and network security technology are also development research in innovative fields that emerged as the times require.

Soldier upgrades:

The above are just my current superficial and simple thoughts, but I have benefited a lot from the theoretical research and study of Teacher Duan.

Soldier upgrades:

The transfer and use of patents still requires specific analysis of specific situations, which is also a direct manifestation of profitability. It is necessary to strictly review the contract, determine the scope of authorization, etc., and even an infringement analysis is necessary.

Duan Yucong:

[voice]

Duan Yucong:

[Voice] Our DIKWP team has "stopped applying for any domestic and international invention patents" since the end of 2021, and is committed to the free promotion and disclosure of DIKWP technological innovations in the whole society, and supports related innovations. Promotion in various fields such as life.

Soldier upgrades:

Teacher Duan, your overall view is admirable. The research results may bring long-term returns. The layout of legal rights protection and technical stability maintenance should also be as perfect as possible, so I will try my best to provide you with my shallow knowledge. Some help, please let me know where I can use it.

Duan Yucong:

Duan Yucong:

@张天书 Thank you for your valuable guidance, and look forward to win-win cooperation and become bigger and stronger

Attachment 3:Exclusive interview with the founder of OpenAI: How will ChatGPT and general artificial intelligence break capitalism?

Original Forbes Published in Shanghai 2023-02-06 19:25

Forbes: Greg Brockman said that while OpenAI is research-driven, it’s not anti-capitalist. How do you balance the for-profit investors wanting a return with the broader goals of OpenAI?

Sam Altman:

I think capitalism is amazing. I love capitalism. Of all the bad systems in the world, it's the best, or the least bad we've found so far. I hope we can find a better system than that. But I think that if AGI is really fully realized, I can imagine it breaking capitalism in various ways.

As far as I know, what we've tried to design is a structure that's different from any other corporate structure because we really believe in what we're doing. If we just thought it was going to be another tech company, then I'd say, "Great, I know the script because I've been doing it my whole career, let's make a really big company. "

But if we do achieve AGI, and it breaks (the paradigm of capitalism), we need to be different (in corporate structures). So I'm really excited about what our team and our investors are doing so well, but I don't think the AI space can be owned by any one company alone. How to share the profits of AGI, how to share its use rights, and how to allocate its governance authority, these three issues require new thinking.