Evans T, Rosenthal ET, Youngblom J, Distel D and Hunt T (1983). Cyclin: a protein specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division. Cell 33:389-396.
Murray AW and Kirschner MW (1989) Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle. Nature 339:275-280. Murray AW, Solomon MJ and Kirschner MW (1989). The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturating promoting factor activity. Nature 339: 280-286.
Hunt T (2004) The discovery of cyclin (I) Cell S116:S63-S64.
Tom Evans (2004). The discovery of cyclin (II) Cell 116:65.
以下转载Evans文章:
“I was fortunate to do my final year degree project with Tim Hunt in Cambridge looking at the control of protein synthesis in sea urchin extracts. I think the project barely achieved a result, but I was fascinated by the subject and caught Tim's infectious enthusiasm. He very kindly asked me to come to Woods Hole as his "bag carrier" for the summer after I had graduated.
The problem we were to address was how the quiescent sea urchin egg kept its maternal mRNA inactive until fertilization, at which point it was able to direct new protein synthesis and many rounds of cell division. Some sort of (deeply unfashionable) mechanism of translational control of mRNA must exist. Instead of dull Eppendorf tubes of egg extracts, Woods Hole had the real beasts, kept on sea-tables within the labs. I was amazed that a simple 12V shock (from a device nicknamed the orgasmotron) would induce a massive outpouring of gametes, which could be fertilized, and the subsequent dividing cells analyzed at leisure. Previous studies in urchins had suggested that fertilization resulted in virtually no change in the qualitative pattern of proteins synthesized, just a large increase in synthetic rate. Probably because we hoped for some fancy control of mRNA translation, Tim thought it would be a good idea to look again at the pattern of protein synthesis following fertilization of sea urchin eggs. He decided we should use continual labeling of the cells with [3sS]-methionine and analyze the accumulating radioactive proteins with onedimensional SDS acrylamide gels.
As it happened, both these choices were highly significant. I remember looking at the autorad of our first experiment. Even to a neophyte such as myself, it was obvious that something rather interesting was going on after fertilization. Not only were brand new proteins synthesized after fertilization, but the most abundant protein virtually disappeared and then reappeared periodically. We photographed the developing eggs and it became apparent that the protein was being degraded around the time of cell division. Whether removal of this protein was the cause or effect of cell division was not clear at that point. Tim saw straight away that this protein must be related in some way to the rather mysterious MPF and came up with the excellent name of cyclin. We thought that this could be part of a larger family of proteins named after leisure pursuits--huntin, shootin, and flshin were clearly the next to be uncovered; a better joke in North America, because nobody got it, and probably reinforcing the view that the English were essentially mad.
Tim, who knew more embryology than he admitted, got one of the course students to repeat the experiment in clam oocytes. Two proteins showed the same periodic destruction following fertilization. Tim knew that mollusks and echinoderms were very distant relatives indeed (all shellfish to me...), and thus the likely significance of cyclin might be quite high. I don't think any of us thought that this would be a fundamental protein in all cells. We presented the results at the end of summer Woods Hole meeting. The paper was politely received, but a few caught our excitement; I remember Gary Borisy telling me that it was absolutely essential that this result was followed up.
Back in Cambridge, Tim wrote up the results which still looked amazing although already rather far away. I also had the overwhelming thought that it could not be that important as it was myself who had been involved in the experiments. Tim did not waver, however, in his understanding that this was a very important piece of work. The initial review did rather wound him, as although Cell agreed to publish, the caveat was "...in nothing like its present form." I also remember going to hear Tim speak about the work in seminars in the Biochemistry department at Cambridge. Several of those who attended would roll their eyes and shake their heads when Tim expanded on his ideas about the possible role of cyclins. But when the paper appeared in Cell, it acquired a much greater respectability, although the exact significance and role of cyclins in cell division was still a long way off.
It was a very heady summer in Woods Hole. Tim was a marvelous mentor and enormously generous in his appreciation of the contributions of others (including novices such as me), as well as in buying countless beers and meals for students on the course. He had a real feel for the nuts and bolts of doing the experiments and thought long and hard about the results. It was a fantastic introduction to science for me, and the peculiar atmosphere at Woods Hole made you work incredibly long hours and yet still feel as if you were on holiday.”