续（一）

六、有时候，是水替蛋白质干活

2025年11月在线发表于Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.的一项工作，标题就很挑衅：《水网络作为蛋白质中的疏水识别基序》^[11]。BRD4的甲基口袋是公认的疏水热点，可它偏偏被一张水网络围着。作者把乙基换成羟基或氨基，活性下降，自由能计算给出的代价依次约为2.5、3.3与10 kcal/mol。极性基团一进去，水网络被打散，蛋白动力学上升；换成疏水基团，水网络反被强化，整体柔性下降。作者还提示，PDE4与BACE1的同源位点可能存在类似的水网络特征^[11]。

这件事的意味比一个靶点要深：疏水识别的“实体”未必是蛋白质的碳原子，也可以是蛋白质预先组织好的一张水网。于是“疏水基序”这个概念，要从“原子团”扩展到“界面结构”。

几句多余的话

把六条线放在一起，能读出三个转向：从标量到分布，从静态到条件，从描述到设计。前两个转向改的是我们怎么“看”疏水，后一个改的是我们怎么“用”疏水。

也要说局限。上述证据里，相当一部分来自粗粒化模拟、短肽凝聚相与体外重构的蛋白脂质体，细胞内的验证仍然偏少。更麻烦的是度量本身：不同实验室用不同标度、不同参照态——水、环己烷、辛醇——数字不能直接横比。Tyr/Phe那个“悖论”，其实就是度量错配的显影：不是谁错了，是两把尺子量的不是同一个环境。

所以，若用一句话概括这五年：疏水基序研究的重心，正从“它有多疏水”移向“它在什么界面、以什么几何、和谁配得上”。前一个问题可以查表，后一个问题得动手做实验。

（本文为文献速览，非系统性综述，选取以近五年公开发表的代表性论文为主；所述结论归原作者，评述部分为笔者个人判断。）

参考文献

[1] van Gils J H M, Gogishvili D, van Eck J, et al. How sticky are our proteins? Quantifying hydrophobicity of the human proteome. Bioinformatics Advances, 2022, 2(1): vbac002. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbac002.

[2] Villegas J A, Levy E D. A unified statistical potential reveals that amino acid stickiness governs nonspecific recruitment of client proteins into condensates. Protein Science, 2022, 31(7): e4361. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4361.

[3] Pitman C, Santiago-McRae E, Lohia R, et al. The Blobulator: a toolkit for identification and visual exploration of hydrophobic modularity in protein sequences. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2026, 66(2): 820–828. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01585.

[4] Chen G, Leppert A, Poska H, et al. Short hydrophobic loop motifs in BRICHOS domains determine chaperone activity against amorphous protein aggregation but not against amyloid formation. Communications Biology, 2023, 6: 497. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04883-2.

[5] Paananen A, Weich S, Szilvay G R, et al. Quantifying biomolecular hydrophobicity: single molecule force spectroscopy of class II hydrophobins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2021, 296: 100728. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100728.

[6] Krainer G, Welsh T J, Joseph J A, et al. Reentrant liquid condensate phase of proteins is stabilized by hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 1085. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21181-9.

[7] De Sancho D, Lopez X. Crossover in aromatic amino acid interaction strength between tyrosine and phenylalanine in biomolecular condensates. eLife, 2025, 14: e104950. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.104950.

[8] Engberg O, Ulbricht D, Döbel V, et al. Rhomboid-catalyzed intramembrane proteolysis requires hydrophobic matching with the surrounding lipid bilayer. Science Advances, 2022, 8(38): eabq8303. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq8303.

[9] Ji X, Hou Z. Sequence-encoded patterning of stickers modulates biomolecular condensate reconfiguration in IDP systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2026, 164(8): 085103. DOI: 10.1063/5.0323902.

[10] Meng Y, Tang G, Wang R, et al. AI-guided hydrophobic core design of robust six-helix bundle proteins. ACS Nano, 2025, 19(43): 38077–38085. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c13783.

[11] Piticchio S G, Martínez-Cartró M, Scaffidi S, et al. Water networks as hydrophobic recognition motifs in proteins. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2026, 65(2). DOI: 10.1002/anie.202521138.

支持单位：