Why the science must take the experimental as its final evidence? There are two reasons. 1) The abstract theoretic formulation is correct in its defined ranges. However, its related interpretation is not. The acceptability of interpretation cannot be taken as the final evidence. This means that the logic consistence must play its role. 2) The correct or intrinsic catching interpretation may fail to get good support from the abstract theoretic formulation. In this case, the correct formulation is under searching. The correctness of such o kind of searching must be checked by all related experiments for the universality of constructed abstract form. The formulated empirical equations are waiting to be reformulated.

       The common mistake in scientific circle which drag the advancement of science is the well-known theory equipped with abstract theoretic formulation and well-accepted interpretation. Such a kind of drag mainly originate from text book and dominant papers published. The theoretic is correct in forms. However, its related interpretation is too artificial.

       Another problem is failed to express the correct or intrinsic interpretation in an abstract formulation system under the guidance of experiments. The wrong mathematic methods play their roles in this field. This means that the empirical equations cannot be raised into an universal abstract form by themselves.

       The first kind of science is referred as: basic theory. The second of science is referred as: phenomenon or empirical.

       The logic conclusion is that: to promote the advancement of science, the basic theory must be under upgrading of interpretation. The empirical equations must be under trying of unification in broad range.

       The interaction between the two domains will form the active force to drive the advancement of science as a whole, although the trace may be very curvature.

 

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自肖建华科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39419-306882.html

上一篇：金融危机与科学理论变革
下一篇：期刊：论文主题的时空演变