尊重科学,独立思考分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/jmluo0922 学习原子分子物理、凝聚态物理,从事生物医学工程

博文

美国SFN学术论战实录(1)氢原子电磁辐射与稳定态(II)

已有 2530 次阅读 2015-5-7 16:46 |个人分类:物质结构|系统分类:论文交流| 争论, 氢原子结构, SFN

Jeremy0922

Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 28 April 2010 - 08:50 AM

Please tell me which journals will publish my manuscript?
  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#22 swansont
swansont

    Shaken, not stirred

  • Moderators

  • 29,430 posts

  • LocationWashington DC region

Posted 30 April 2010 - 04:07 PM

None of the reputable ones.  You might try Galilean Electrodynamics.
  • 0

Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum                                   To shake my vodka martini, click the up arrow ^

I am not a minimum-wage government shill.             Forget it, Jake — it's Crackpottown.

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea                                                          

 

 

                                                                                                                   

 

 

#23 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 5 November 2010 - 02:52 AM

None of the reputable ones.  You might try Galilean Electrodynamics.



After view the discussion on SFN, the editor of Galilean Electrodynamics (GED) think my work is good one,  and accept my submission. I think GED provide us an opportunity to share our work, and respect the editors.

Edited by Jeremy0922,  5 November 2010 - 05:40 AM.

  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#24 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 11 March 2011 - 04:22 AM

GED will publish my paper "Electromagnetic Radiation and stability of the Hydrogen Atom " in2012, the preprint of my paper is linked for read. If you are going to propagate this information to any third party, Please contact with GED.

Edited by Jeremy0922, 11 March 2011 - 04:24 AM.

  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#25 xiaojun
xiaojun

    Meson

  • Senior Members

  • 51 posts


Posted 22 July 2014 - 08:52 PM

According to my understanding, in a hydrogen atom, electromagnetic radiation is independent of the electro motion state, and the energy levels of the hydrogen atom on.


  • 0

#26 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 02:16 AM

According to my understanding, in a hydrogen atom, electromagnetic radiation is independent of the electro motion state, and the energy levels of the hydrogen atom on.

 

At the ground state, whether the electron produces radiation?


Edited by Jeremy0922, 23 July 2014 - 02:16 AM.

  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#27 xiaojun
xiaojun

    Meson

  • Senior Members

  • 51 posts


Posted 23 July 2014 - 03:19 AM

 

At the ground state, whether the electron produces radiation?

Electron acceleration with a radiation, it and the electron in hydrogen atom jumps between radiation produced differentiated


  • 0

#28 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 03:37 AM

Electron acceleration with a radiation, it and the electron in hydrogen atom jumps between radiation produced differentiated

How do we understand the ground state of  the H atom is steady?


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#29 Sensei
Sensei

    Primate

  • Senior Members

  • 1,594 posts


Posted 23 July 2014 - 03:47 AM

 

At the ground state, whether the electron produces radiation?

 

It would violate conservation of energy, if electron would forever emit photons.

It would means that electron has infinite amount of energy (which is obviously not true).


  • 0

#30 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 04:09 AM

 

It would violate conservation of energy, if electron would forever emit photons.

It would means that electron has infinite amount of energy (which is obviously not true).

 

Yes, this problem has not be solved by present theories, so we must consider the interactions among radiations and charged particles in H atom for proving there is a steady state.


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#31 Sensei
Sensei

    Primate

  • Senior Members

  • 1,594 posts


Posted 23 July 2014 - 04:58 AM

 

Yes, this problem has not be solved by present theories, so we must consider the interactions among radiations and charged particles in H atom for proving there is a steady state.

 

You turned mine answer upside down...


  • 0

#32 xiaojun
xiaojun

    Meson

  • Senior Members

  • 51 posts


Posted 23 July 2014 - 05:12 AM

 

It would violate conservation of energy, if electron would forever emit photons.

It would means that electron has infinite amount of energy (which is obviously not true).

Electronic energy released no larger than the electron carries energy


 

Yes, this problem has not be solved by present theories, so we must consider the interactions among radiations and charged particles in H atom for proving there is a steady state.

I don't know what you write, but according to some words to express my personal opinion, it may also produce some misunderstanding解


  • 0

#33 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 07:14 AM


 

I don't know what you write, but according to some words to express my personal opinion, it may also produce some misunderstanding解

 

OK, you could uderstand my opnion from my paper and posts


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#34 Strange
Strange

    Scientist

  • Senior Members

  • 4,679 posts

  • Location他国

Posted 23 July 2014 - 07:42 AM

 

Yes, this problem has not be solved by present theories.

 

Not true. This is yet another bit of evidence for the quantum model that you are simply dismissing because it contradicts your personal belief.


  • 0

#35 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 08:04 AM

 

Not true. This is yet another bit of evidence for the quantum model that you are simply dismissing because it contradicts your personal belief.

 

Please tell me how to explain there is a ground state of H atom by QM.


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#36 Strange
Strange

    Scientist

  • Senior Members

  • 4,679 posts

  • Location他国

Posted 23 July 2014 - 08:30 AM

 

Please tell me how to explain there is a ground state of H atom by QM.

 

You mean you don't understand the theory that you claim is wrong?

 

How can you say it is wrong, if you don't understand it?


  • 0

#37 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:05 AM

 

You mean you don't understand the theory that you claim is wrong?

 

How can you say it is wrong, if you don't understand it?

 

Don't misunderstand my question, Please explain the ground state of H atom by QM.


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#38 Strange
Strange

    Scientist

  • Senior Members

  • 4,679 posts

  • Location他国

Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:16 AM

 

Don't misunderstand my question, Please explain the ground state of H atom by QM.

 

Maybe you should post a question in the physics section of the forum if you are interested in learning something about physics.


Edited by Strange, 23 July 2014 - 09:16 AM.

  • 0

#39 Jeremy0922
Jeremy0922

    Quark

  • Senior Members

  • 171 posts

  • LocationChina

Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:28 AM

 

Maybe you should post a question in the physics section of the forum if you are interested in learning something about physics.

 

That means you can not explain!


  • 0

Trust Science. Think independently
#40 Strange
Strange

    Scientist

  • Senior Members

  • 4,679 posts

  • Location他国

Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:44 AM

 

That means you can not explain!

 

It certainly means I cannot explain. But I am quite sure there are people here who can. Which is why I suggest you ask in the appropriate section of the forum (in the unlikely event that you are interested in learning).






https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-378615-888254.html

上一篇:美国SFN学术论战实录(1)氢原子电磁辐射与稳定态(I)
下一篇:美国SFN学术论战实录(1)氢原子电磁辐射与稳定态(III)
收藏 IP: 59.40.193.*| 热度|

1 杨正瓴

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-12-24 07:38

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部