从真傻的博文得知，沈阳师范大学刘跃老师等在近期刚刚刊出的SCI论文里引用了几位科学网博主（真傻、秦四清、大呆）的博文：

Ying Liu, Yue Liu, and Michael G B Drew. A theoretical investigation of the quarter-wavelength model-part 2: verification and extension [J]. Physica Scripta, 2022, 97(1): Article Number: 015806.

DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1eb1

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1402-4896/ac1eb1

大呆有点好奇，这是一篇研究微波吸收理论的论文，为什么要引用我们关于创新性与Top刊物关系等的博文？我将论文下载下来看看，将刘跃老师论文中的引用复制如下：

引用之一：

Mistakes that have occurred by not challenging well established theories are not restricted to only one field but are common in publications [25–32].

引用之二：

Our work shows that there is a general practice in scientific research of using established theory believing that it must be correct because it has been used for many years by many researchers. However, such theories need to be constantly checked, particularly when they are inconsistent with published experimental data and fundamental physical principles. Many people do not assess mathematical or theoretical theory in their field. However, the mathematical derivations provide reliable logical reasoning which should be considered relevant to experimentalists as they can provide the true basis for evaluating experimental data. Attractive but superficial interpretations without full understanding can seriously inhibit progress in fundamental research [59–61].

其中的参考文献为：

[25] Yang Zheng-Ling 2020 Zenas axiom: Other associated views (in Chinese. It can be translated into English easily by machine translation) (http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1221692.html)

[27] Yang Zheng-Ling 2017 Top Journals do not publish Top Results in science and technology (http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1061527.html)

[28] Yang Zheng-Ling 2020 Zenas axiom and Joseph Agassi (http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-107667-1243254.html)

[59] Yang Zheng-Ling 2019 Limitations of peer review and improvement measures (in Chinese) Scitech in China 23 34–36 (http://www.casted.org.cn/channel/newsinfo/7562)

[60] Zhang Zhidong 2008 Should publication in top journals be an assessment on researchers (in Chinese) (http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2344-13949.html)

[61] Qin Siqing 2020 Establish a correct orientation for paper publishing (in Chinese) (http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-575926-1238948.html)

       可见作者是用我们博文中的观点说服审稿人和读者相信，在过去已经发表的工作中有许多是错误的工作，是不求甚解，人云亦云的。而他们现在的工作是正确的。真没有想到，科学网上的博文还能起到这种作用。

       大呆非常好奇的是：一）论文最后作者Michael G B Drew是外国人，二）论文的审稿人也有可能是外国人。他们都能够看得懂中文？

       无论如何，科学网的博文能够被SCI论文引用，总是一件令人开心的事情，比论文被引用还开心。毕竟物以稀为贵，实在是一件稀罕事。希望这是一个良好的开端，有更多的科学网博文被引用，科学网的影响力越来越大。