博文
该怎样拯救你,我的第一篇Transactions,求高手指点
|
| Additional Questions | Reviewer1 | Reviewer2 | Reviewer3 | Reviewer4 |
| Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field? | Moderately So | Moderately So | Yes | Yes |
| Is the paper technically sound? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced? | Important Information is missing or superficially treated. | Treatment somewhat unbalanced, but not seriously so. | Certain parts significantly overstressed | Treatment somewhat unbalanced, but not seriously so. |
| How would you describe technical depth of paper? | Suitable only for an expert | Suitable only for an expert | Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field | Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field |
| How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper? | Somewhat Novel | Somewhat Novel | Somewhat Novel | Somewhat Novel |
| How would you rate the overall organization of the paper? | Satisfactory | Could be improved | Poor | Could be improved |
| Are the title and abstract satisfactory? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Is the length of the paper appropriate? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined? | Not always | Not always | Not always | Not always |
| How do you rate the English usage? | Satisfactory | Needs improvement | Poor | Poor |
| Rate the Bibliography | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
| How would you rate the technical contents of the paper? | Excellent | Good | Fair | Fair |
| How would you rate the novelty of the paper? | Sufficiently Novel | Slightly Novel | Slightly Novel | Slightly Novel |
| How would you rate the "literary" presentation of the paper? | Mostly Accessible | Partially Accessible | Partially Accessible | Mostly Accessible |
| How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this IEEE Transactions? | Good Match | Weak Match | Poor Match | Good Match |
| Recommendation? | AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes | Review Again After Major Changes | R – Reject | Review Again After Major Changes |
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-48882-674073.html
上一篇：大学的价值在于"研究型学习"
下一篇：我实验室报名参加2013中文手写识别大赛
