最误导的误解和炒作是：多世界、多意识（MW/M）和“可能的都存在”（PP，~充实性、丰富、丰饶原则）是量子力学的结果后者诠释，和PP变了到“可以想象都可能”。这个错误让人不了解量子力学，而且怕MW/M, 主张是不道德。我们必须了解：MW/M是形而上学的托多托特；这种基本“万物理论”先验推导量子力学，要不然不能明白（量子）纠缠让可能的少！    The most misleading misconception and hype is: Many-World/Mind (MW/M) and "that everything possible exists" (‘Plenitude Principle’ (PP)) are the result of quantum mechanics (QM) or even mere interpretations of QM, and that the PP has changed to "anything conceivable is possible". These mistakes make people not understand QM, and fear MW/M, claiming it to be immoral. We must understand: MW/M is metaphysically tautological; such fundamental 'Theory of Everything' (TOE) implies QM a priori, otherwise it cannot be understood that (QM) entanglement reduces(!) the possible.

记得：根本科学，“万物理论”，不是经验科学。“MW/M、PP第一，量子力学以后”就是一个例子。我有三个办法教MW/M：

1）基本语言的托多托特 – 这个办法可明白的人太少

2）在很大的宇宙，不能知道“自己”是哪个复制、副本 – 这个办法流行，但太天真的现实主义

3）如下

    Remember: Fundamental Science, the TOE, is not empirical science. "MW/M, PP come first, QM later" is an example. I have three ways to teach MW/M: 1) As tautology of fundamentally meaningful language – too few understand such approaches 2) In a very large universe, you cannot know which copy “you” are – this method is popular, but a too naïve realism 3) as follows

人觉得，如果只有一个小世界（宇宙），和它的一个历史，那就不用怕什么不好的都会存在；可能的未来少。但是，如果这种“一个历史的一个世界”可以自己存在，独立，在它本身里面，那就别的可能的世界都也这样自己可以存在，不能避免。你在哪个？不能知道，所以“什么都可能”！    People feel that if there is only one small world (universe), and its single history, we need not be afraid of that all the possible bad exists; the possible futures are less. But if this "single world with one history" can exist on its own, independently, within itself, then all other such possible worlds can exist in just the same way, they cannot be avoided. Which one are you in? You cannot know, therefore "anything is possible"!

图片都从[Vongehr 2019]

但是可能的历史、意识在一起在一个“逻辑系统”，所以纠缠；这减少了可能性。But possible histories/minds are together in one "logical system", thereby entangled; this reduces the possibilities.

怎么推导量子力学？基本托多托特是：

1）Alice和Bob都有多未来，A=0，A=1，B=0，B=1。

2）已经意识，“太晚了”，不能删除、去掉（使看不见的）。

所以，如果，比如说，A=B 只是可以想象的但是没有，那就A=0见面B=1，和A=1见面B=0。这种的MW/M几何[Vongehr 2011]可以违反贝尔不等式。如果能量和可能概率守恒定律，MW/M几何是标准量子力学，一样违反贝尔[Vongehr 2013]。 How to derive QM? Fundamentally tautological are: 1) Alice and Bob have both many futures, A=0, A=1, B=0, B=1. 2) Once something is conscious, it is "too late", it cannot be removed (made unseen). So, if, say, A=B is merely conceivable but actually impossible, then A=0 meets B=1, and A=1 meets B=0. This MW/M geometry [Vongehr 2011] can violate the Bell-inequality. If energy and probability are conserved, MW/M geometry is standard QM, violating Bell as much [Vongehr 2013].

图片都从[Vongehr 2019]

参考:

[Vongehr 2011] Many Worlds Model resolving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox via a Direct Realism to Modal Realism Transition that preserves Einstein Locality. arXiv:1108.1674 (2011)

[Vongehr 2013] Against Absolute Actualization: Three “Non-Localities” and Failure of Model-External Randomness made easy with Many-Worlds Models including Stronger Bell-Violation and Correct QM Probability. arXiv:1311.5419 (2013)

[Vongehr 2019]“Fundamental Science and Critical Thinking for All from Applied to Social Science Students.” Lecture Notes, Nanjing University (2019)

注意：我中文很差，所以：

1）如果中文有误解，不礼貌的，英文版算！

2）评论必须风洒沙风格：短，中英文

Note: My Chinese is poor, so:

1) If the Chinese is misunderstood or impolite, the English version counts!

2) Comments must have FSS-style: Short, Chinese and English