本期【刊•见】为诸位介绍一本聚焦临床神经精神病学与神经科学交叉领域的开放获取期刊—Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience。除了对关键指标进行详尽解读外，还向您推荐刊内近三年高被引文章，以及近一年高阅读量文章：

• 世界生物精神病学会联合会关于强迫性性行为障碍的评估及药物治疗指南

• 运动成瘾：研究问题的综述概述

• 通过孟德尔随机化分析评估炎症性肠病的遗传易感性与孤独症谱系障碍之间的因果关系

Online ISSN: 1958-5969

根据JCR显示，Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

• 在神经科学排名 18/314

Scopus

根据Scopus显示, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

• 2024年CiteScore为 6.7

• 2025年CiteScore Tracker为 6.2

• 在医学：精神病学与心理健康领域排名 106/580

• 在神经科学：生物精神病学领域排名 16/54

中国科学院文献情报中心期刊分区表

根据2025年3月20日发布的中国科学院期刊分区表显示：

• 大类及分区：医学2区

• 小类及分区：神经科学2区

接收文章类型

Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 期刊接受专家综述、原创论文和简报。

文章出版费（APC）

请访问期刊主页或Taylor & Francis Open Access APC Cost Finder查找适用于作者所在国家及不同文章类型的费用情况。若您所在的机构或相关资助者与我们签有开放获取出版协议，您可能有资格获得APC支持，请访问我们的作者服务网站以了解更多！

Taylor & Francis现在开通APC便捷支付功能，可以一键通过微信、支付宝和银联使用人民币便捷付款。

Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience主编由法国巴黎大学 Florence Thibaut 教授担任。编辑团队囊括神经科学、精神病学、药理学、神经影像学等多领域专家，确保期刊内容兼顾基础研究与临床应用。编委研究方向紧密围绕神经精神疾病的诊断、治疗及患者管理。

主编

Florence Thibaut

Florence Thibaut 教授，在巴黎大学（法国），科钦医院，及法国国家健康与医学研究院（Inserm）U1266 研究所均有任职。专注于精神病学与成瘾性疾病的神经生物学机制，尤其关注精神分裂症、药物成瘾、性成瘾障碍的遗传学、精神药理学及临床干预策略。她在国际精神健康领域具有广泛影响力，曾任世界生物精神病学协会联合会（WFSBP）主席。

根据JCR显示，近三年在Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience发文的国家/地区中，发文数量排名前三的有：

• 美国

• 法国

• 德国

近三年，在Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience发文的全球高校和科研机构中，发文数量排名前三的是：

• 法国国家健康与医学研究院

• 巴黎公立医院集团

• 耶鲁大学

The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry guidelines on the assessment and pharmacological treatment of compulsive sexual behaviour disorder

世界生物精神病学会联合会关于强迫性性行为障碍的评估及药物治疗指南

作者：Daniel Turner et al.

文章摘要：

Objectives

The current guidelines aim to evaluate the role of pharmacological agents in the treatment of patients with compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (CSBD). They are intended for use in clinical practice by clinicians who treat patients with CSBD.

Methods

An extensive literature search was conducted using the English-language-literature indexed on PubMed and Google Scholar without time limit, supplemented by other sources, including published reviews.

Results

Each treatment recommendation was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy, safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Psychoeducation and psychotherapy are first-choice treatments and should always be conducted. The type of medication recommended depended mainly on the intensity of CSBD and comorbid sexual and psychiatric disorders. There are few randomised controlled trials. Although no medications carry formal indications for CSBD, selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors and naltrexone currently constitute the most relevant pharmacological treatments for the treatment of CSBD. In cases of CSBD with comorbid paraphilic disorders, hormonal agents may be indicated, and one should refer to previously published guidelines on the treatment of adults with paraphilic disorders. Specific recommendations are also proposed in case of chemsex behaviour associated with CSBD.

Conclusions

An algorithm is proposed with different levels of treatment for different categories of patients with CSBD.

Exercise addiction: A narrative overview of research issues

运动成瘾：研究问题的综述概述

作者：Aviv Weinstein & Attila Szabo

文章摘要：

This narrative overview summarises the work on exercise addiction (EA) over the past 12 years and exposes critical conceptual and methodological issues. More than 1000 articles exist on EA, conceptualised as uncontrolled training harming the individual. Still, EA has no clinical diagnosis criteria at this time. Research is increasing continuously, but it is stale in advancing knowledge. Scalar measurement and lack of differentiation between addictive and instrumental exercise could be reasons for insufficient progress. Exercise addiction fits in the framework of behavioural addictions, but excessive exercise patterns also co-occur with other morbidities, including eating or body-image disorders. In these cases, exercise is instrumental; it functions to achieve a non-exercise-related goal. Therefore, it is essential to separate primary from secondary EA. Based on the interactional model, significant stress and capacity-exceeding ambitions fuel primary EA, while chief motives behind secondary EA embed body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Few reports exist on EA’s brain mechanisms, which could delay its classification as a distinct psychiatric dysfunction. Treatment of EA involves cognitive-behavioural approaches, but we know little about their effectiveness. Conceptually focussed psychophysiological research and in-depth interviews, complementing scalar data, could answer several open questions in this widely studied but relatively stagnant scholastic field.

Figure 1. Exercise addiction abstracts PUBMED

Evaluation of causal relationships between genetic liability to inflammatory bowel disease and autism spectrum disorder by Mendelian randomization analysis

通过孟德尔随机化分析评估炎症性肠病的遗传易感性与孤独症谱系障碍之间的因果关系

作者：Ruijie Zeng et al.

文章摘要：

Background

Emerging observational studies have indicated the association between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and IBD, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), whereas the causality remains unknown.

Methods

Summary-level data from large-scale genome-wide association (GWAS) studies of IBD and ASD were retrieved. Mendelian randomisation analyses were performed with a series of sensitivity tests.

Results

Genetic predisposition to ASD was not associated with the risk of IBD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI = 0.91–1.06, p = 0.70; OR [95% CI]: 1.03 [0.93–1.13], p = 0.58 for CD; OR [95% CI]: 0.96 [0.87–1.05], p = 0.37 for UC) in the IIBDGC dataset. In the FinnGen dataset, their causal effects were unfounded (OR [95% CI]: 1.04 [0.94–1.15], p = 0.49 for IBD; OR [95% CI]: 1.08 [0.89–1.31], p = 0.42 for CD; OR [95% CI]: 1.00 [0.88–1.13], p = 0.95 for UC). In the meta-analysis of two datasets, the OR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.96–1.07, p = 0.45). For the risk of ASD under genetic liability to IBD, the OR from meta-analysis was 1.03 (95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate genetic predisposition to ASD might not increase the risk of IBD, whereas genetic liability to IBD is associated with an increased risk of ASD. Further investigations using more powerful datasets are warranted.

为帮助更多科研人员选择更加合适的期刊，Taylor & Francis推出专栏——刊·见，该专栏致力于为读者和广大科研人员带来Taylor & Francis旗下期刊的详细解读，从期刊的基本情况、编委阵容、社会影响力到审稿速度、高被引文章等实用信息，专栏将为您带来最详细的介绍，让您更加全面地了解Taylor & Francis旗下优秀的国际期刊，帮助更多中国卓越科研成果顺利在国际期刊上发表。