What is the Universe Made Of?
One of the key questions that needs to be answered by astrophysicists is
what is really out there? And of what is it all made? Without this
understanding it is impossible to come to any firm conclusions about how
the universe evolved. 什么组成了我们的宇宙?
天体物理学家需要回答的重要问题之一是宇宙中到底都有些什么东西?以及这些东西由什么组成?如果缺乏对这些问题的理解,就不可能给出宇宙如何演化的确切回答。
Protons, Neutrons and Electrons: The Stuff of Life
You, this computer, the air we breathe, and the distant stars
are all made up of protons, neutrons and electrons. Protons and
neutrons are bound together into nuclei and atoms are nuclei surrounded
by a full complement of electrons. Hydrogen is composed of one proton
and one electron. Helium is composed of two protons, two neutrons and
two electrons. Carbon is composed of six protons, six neutrons and six
electrons. Heavier elements, such as iron, lead and uranium, contain
even larger numbers of protons, neutrons and electrons. Astronomers like
to call all material made up of protons, neutrons and electrons
"baryonic matter".
Until about thirty years ago, astronomers thought that the universe was
composed almost entirely of this "baryonic matter", ordinary atoms.
However, in the past few decades, there has been ever more evidence
accumulating that suggests there is something in the universe that we
can not see, perhaps some new form of matter. 质子、中子和电子:组成生命的材料
你自己、你面前的电脑、我们呼吸的空气、以及遥远的恒星都是由质子、中子和电子组成的。质子和中子被束缚在一起形成原子核,而原子是原子核外围绕着电子的
组合,电子的数量等于原子核电荷数。氢原子由一个质子和一个电子组成,氦原子由两个质子、两个中子以及两个电子组成。碳原子由六个质子、六个中子以及六个
电子组成。(这里的说法未考虑同位素,译者注。)更重的元素,如铁、铅、铀等,包含着更多的质子、中子和电子。天文学家将由质子、中子和电子组成的物质称
为“重子物质”。
直到大约30年前,天文学家仍然以为我们的宇宙差不多都是由这种“重子物质”组成的,宇宙中都是普通的原子。然而,在过去的几十年中,支持下面观点的证据越来越多:宇宙中有我们看不到的东西,也许是一些新的物质形式。 WMAP and Dark Matter / Dark energy
By making accurate measurements of the cosmic microwave background fluctuations, WMAP is able to measure the basic parameters
of the Big Bang model including the density and composition of the
universe. WMAP measures the relative density of baryonic and
non-baryonic matter to an accuracy of better than a few percent of the
overall density. It is also able to determine some of the properties of
the non-baryonic matter: the interactions of the non-baryonic matter
with itself, its mass and its interactions with ordinary matter all
affect the details of the cosmic microwave background fluctuation
spectrum. WMAP和暗物质/暗能量
通过对宇宙微波背景波动的精确测量,WMAP卫星可以测量大爆炸宇宙模型中的各种基本参数,包括宇宙的密度和组成。WMAP测量重子物质和非重子物质的相
对密度,对这一数据的测量要比整体密度精确几个百分点。WAMP还能确定非重子物质的一些性质:非重子物质之间的相互作用、非重子物质的质量以及与普通物
质的相互作用,这些参数都会对宇宙微波背景波动谱产生影响。
WMAP determined that the universe is flat,
from which it follows that the mean energy density in the universe is
equal to the critical density (within a 1% margin of error). This is
equivalent to a mass density of 9.9 x 10[sup]-30[/sup] g/cm[sup]3[/sup],
which is equivalent to only 5.9 protons per cubic meter. Of this total
density, we now know the breakdown to be:
WAMP数据说明宇宙是平坦的,这表明宇宙的平均密度等于临界密度(低于1%的误差幅度)。这相当于物质密度大约为
9.9 x 10[sup]-30[/sup]
g/cm[sup]3[/sup],或者相当于每立方米体积5.9个质子。根据这一总密度,我们可以获得如下的统计结果:
4.6% Atoms. More than 95% of the
energy density in the universe is in a form that has never been directly
detected in the laboratory! The actual density of atoms is equivalent
to roughly 1 proton per 4 cubic meters.
23% Cold Dark Matter. Dark matter is likely to be
composed of one or more species of sub-atomic particles that interact
very weakly with ordinary matter. Particle physicists have many
plausible candidates for the dark matter, and new particle accelerator
experiments are likely to bring new insight in the coming years.
72% Dark Energy. The first
observational hints of dark energy in the universe date back to the
1980's when astronomers were trying to understand how clusters of
galaxies were formed. Their attempts to explain the observed
distribution of galaxies were improved if dark energy was present, but
the evidence was highly uncertain. In the 1990's, observations of
supernova were used to trace the expansion history of the universe (over
relatively recent times) and the big surprise was that the expansion
appeared to be speeding up, rather than slowing down! There was some
concern that the supernova data were being misinterpreted, but the
result has held up to this day. In 2003, the first WMAP results came out
indicating that the universe was flat (see above) and that the dark
matter made up only ~23% of the density required to produce a flat
universe. If 72% of the energy density in the universe is in the form of
dark energy, which has a gravitationally repulsive effect, it is just
the right amount to explain both the flatness of the universe and the
observed accelerated expansion. Thus dark energy explains many
cosmological observations at once.
Fast moving neutrinos do not play a
major role in the evolution of structure in the universe. They would
have prevented the early clumping of gas in the universe, delaying the
emergence of the first stars, in conflict with the WMAP data. However,
with 5 years of data, WMAP is able to see evidence that a sea of cosmic
neutrinos do exist in numbers that are expected from other lines of
reasoning. This is the first time that such evidence has come from the
cosmic microwave background.
Another Probe of Dark Matter
By measuring the motions of stars and gas, astronomers can "weigh"
galaxies. In our own solar system, we can use the velocity of the Earth
around the Sun to measure the Sun's mass. The Earth moves around the Sun
at 30 kilometers per second (roughly sixty thousand miles per hour). If
the Sun were four times more massive, then the Earth would need to move
around the Sun at 60 kilometers per second in order for it to stay on
its orbit. The Sun moves around the Milky Way
at 225 kilometers per second. We can use this velocity (and the
velocity of other stars) to measure the mass of our Galaxy. Similarly,
radio and optical observations of gas and stars in distant galaxies
enable astronomers to determine the distribution of mass in these
systems.
The mass that astronomers infer for galaxies including
our own is roughly ten times larger than the mass that can be associated
with stars, gas and dust in a Galaxy. This mass discrepancy has been
confirmed by observations of gravitational lensing, the bending of light
predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity. 暗物质的其他探索
通过测量恒星和星际气体的运动,天文学家可以“称”星系的质量。以我们的太阳系为例,我们可以利用地球围绕太阳运动的速度
算出太阳的质量。地球大约以30km/s(大约60k英里每小时)围绕太阳转动。如果太阳质量是现在的4倍,那么地球就需要以60km/s的速度绕太阳运
动,以便保持在现有的轨道上。而太阳以225km/s的速度绕银心转动。我们可以利用这一速度(以及其他恒星的转动速度)计算银河系的质量。同样,对遥远
星系中恒星和星际气体的射电和可见光观测结果可以帮助天文学家确定这些星系中的物质分布。
HST Image of a gravitational lens Text Link for an HST press release describing this image.
By measuring how the background galaxies are distorted by
the foreground cluster, astronomers can measure the mass in the
cluster. The mass in the cluster is more than five times larger than the
inferred mass in visible stars, gas and dust.
通过测量背景星系的光线被前景星系团的扭曲程度,天文学家可以计算星系图的质量。这样得到的星系团质量比由可见恒星、星际气体及尘埃计算得到的数据大5倍。
Candidates for the Dark Matter
What is the nature of the "dark matter", this mysterious material that
exerts a gravitational pull, but does not emit nor absorb light?
Astronomers do not know. 暗物质的候选者
暗物质的本质是什么?这种神秘的物质可以提供万有引力效应,但不发出、也不吸收光?天文学家不知道有什么可以做到这一点。
There are a number of plausible speculations on the nature of the dark matter:
对暗物质的本质有很多可能的推测:
Brown Dwarfs: if a star's
mass is less than one twentieth of our Sun, its core is not hot enough
to burn either hydrogen or deuterium, so it shines only by virtue of its
gravitational contraction. These dim objects, intermediate between
stars and planets, are not luminous enough to be directly detectable by
our telescopes. Brown Dwarfs and similar objects have been nicknamed
MACHOs (MAssive Compact Halo Objects) by astronomers. These MACHOs are
potentially detectable by gravitational lensing experiments. If the dark
matter is made mostly of MACHOs, then it is likely that baryonic matter
does make up most of the mass of the universe.
Supermassive Black Holes: these are thought to power distant k quasars.
Some astronomers speculate that there may be copious numbers of black
holes comprising the dark matter. These black holes are also potentially
detectable through their lensing effects.
New forms of matter: particle physicists,
scientists who work to understand the fundamental forces of nature and
the composition of matter, have speculated that there are new forces and
new types of particles. One of the primary motivations for building
"supercolliders" is to try to produce this matter in the laboratory.
Since the universe was very dense and hot in the early moments following
the Big Bang,
the universe itself was a wonderful particle accelerator. Cosmologists
speculate that the dark matter may be made of particles produced shortly
after the Big Bang. These particles would be very different from
ordinary "baryonic matter". Cosmologists call these hypothetical
particles WIMPs (for Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) or
"non-baryonic matter".
Dark Energy: a Cosmological Constant?
Dark Energy makes up a large majority ot the total content of the
universe, but this was not always known. Einstein first proposed the
cosmological constant (not to be confused with the Hubble Constant)
usually symbolized by the greek letter "lambda" (Λ), as a mathematical
fix to the theory of general relativity. In its simplest form, general
relativity predicted that the universe must either expand or contract.
Einstein thought the universe was static, so he added this new term to
stop the expansion. Friedmann, a Russian mathematician, realized that
this was an unstable fix, like balancing a pencil on its point, and
proposed an expanding universe model, now called the Big Bang theory. When Hubble's study of nearby galaxies showed that the universe was in fact expanding, Einstein regretted modifying his elegant theory and viewed the cosmological constant term as his "greatest mistake".
Many cosmologists advocate reviving the cosmological constant term on
theoretical grounds, as a way to explain the rate of expansion of the
universe. Modern field theory associates this term with the energy
density of the vacuum. For this energy density to be comparable to other
forms of matter in the universe, it would require new physics theories.
So the addition of a cosmological constant term has profound
implications for particle physics and our understanding of the
fundamental forces of nature.
The main attraction of the cosmological constant term is that it
significantly improves the agreement between theory and observation. The
most spectacular example of this is the recent effort to measure how
much the expansion of the universe has changed in the last few billion
years. Generically, the gravitational pull exerted by the matter in the
universe slows the expansion imparted by the Big Bang. Very recently it
has become practical for astronomers to observe very bright rare stars
called supernova in an effort to measure how much the universal
expansion has slowed over the last few billion years. Surprisingly, the
results of these observations indicate that the universal expansion is
speeding up, or accelerating! While these results should be considered
preliminary, they raise the possibility that the universe contains a
bizarre form of matter or energy that is, in effect, gravitationally
repulsive. The cosmological constant is an example of this type of
energy. Much work remains to elucidate this mystery!
There are a number of other observations that are suggestive of the need
for a cosmological constant. For example, if the cosmological constant
today comprises most of the energy density of the universe, then the
extrapolated age
of the universe is much larger than it would be without such a term,
which helps avoid the dilemma that the extrapolated age of the universe
is younger than some of the oldest stars we observe! A cosmological
constant term added to the standard model Big Bang theory leads to a
model that appears to be consistent with the observed large-scale distribution of galaxies and clusters, with WMAP's measurements of cosmic microwave background fluctuations, and with the observed properties of X-ray clusters.