The 12 philosophical problems by the DIKWP Semantic Mathematics 

Yucong Duan

International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)

World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)

World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)

(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)

Continuing from the previous analysis, this section provides a step-by-step reasoning of the mapping and analysis of the 12 philosophical problems using the DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework and the four spaces. Tables are included to present the details clearly for readers.1. Methodology Overview

To systematically analyze each philosophical problem, we follow these steps:

1. Identify DIKWP Components: Decompose each problem into Data (D), Information (I), Knowledge (K), Wisdom (W), and Purpose (P).

2. Map to the Four Spaces: Assign each component to the appropriate space—Conceptual Space (ConC), Semantic Space (SemA), Cognitive Space (ConN), and Conscious Space.

3. Mathematical Representation: Use mathematical tools such as equivalence relations, distance metrics, and formal logic.

4. Analyze Completeness and Consistency: Assess the logical structure and identify overlaps.

5. Summarize in Tables: Present the mappings and analyses in tables for clarity.

2. Detailed Analysis of Individual Philosophical Problems2.1 Mind-Body Problem

Step 1: Identify DIKWP Components

DIKWP Component	Description
Data (D)	Observations of mental phenomena and physical brain processes
Information (I)	Correlations and differences between mental and physical states
Knowledge (K)	Theories like dualism and physicalism
Wisdom (W)	Insights into implications of each theory
Purpose (P)	Understanding consciousness to enhance well-being

Step 2: Map to the Four Spaces

Space	Mapping
Conceptual (ConC)	Concepts: Mind (M), Body (B), Mental States, Physical States
Semantic (SemA)	Meanings: Dualism (D), Physicalism (P); interpretations of mind-body relationships
Cognitive (ConN)	Functions: f1 (evaluate dualism), f2 (analyze physicalism), f3 (reconcile viewpoints)
Conscious	Emergent Properties: Subjective Experience (SE), Self-Awareness (SA)

Step 3: Mathematical Representation

• Equivalence Relations (~): Define equivalence classes for mental states.

• Distance Metrics (δ): Measure differences between mental and physical states.

• Formal Logic: Use logical systems to evaluate arguments.

Step 4: Analyze Completeness and Consistency

• Completeness: Ensure all relevant theories (dualism, physicalism, etc.) are considered.

• Consistency: Avoid contradictions between theories and empirical data.

Step 5: Summarize in Table

Aspect	Details
DIKWP Components	D, I, K, W, P as identified above
Spaces Mapping	ConC: M, B; SemA: D, P; ConN: f1, f2, f3; Conscious: SE, SA
Mathematical Tools	Equivalence Relations, Distance Metrics, Formal Logic
Completeness	Theories comprehensively considered
Consistency	Logical coherence maintained
Overlaps	Links to Hard Problem of Consciousness, Free Will vs. Determinism

2.2 Hard Problem of Consciousness

Step 1: Identify DIKWP Components

DIKWP Component	Description
Data (D)	Neuroscientific data, phenomenological reports
Information (I)	Patterns correlating brain activity with experiences
Knowledge (K)	Theories addressing the explanatory gap
Wisdom (W)	Understanding limitations, exploring new paradigms
Purpose (P)	Developing comprehensive models of consciousness

Step 2: Map to the Four Spaces

Space	Mapping
Conceptual (ConC)	Concepts: Qualia (Q), Neural Correlates (NC)
Semantic (SemA)	Meanings: Explanatory Gap (EG), interpretations of consciousness
Cognitive (ConN)	Functions: f1 (analyze bridging theories), f2 (evaluate IIT)
Conscious	Emergent Properties: Conscious Experience (CE)

Step 3: Mathematical Representation

• Incomplete Knowledge (K): Acknowledge gaps in understanding.

• Distance Metrics (δ): Quantify disparities between physical explanations and subjective experiences.

Step 4: Analyze Completeness and Consistency

• Completeness: Challenged by the nature of subjective experience.

• Consistency: Maintain logical coherence despite incomplete knowledge.

Step 5: Summarize in Table

Aspect	Details
DIKWP Components	D, I, K, W, P as identified above
Spaces Mapping	ConC: Q, NC; SemA: EG; ConN: f1, f2; Conscious: CE
Mathematical Tools	Incomplete Knowledge Representation, Distance Metrics
Completeness	Recognized limitations due to subjective experience
Consistency	Logical coherence aimed for within incomplete knowledge
Overlaps	Links to Mind-Body Problem

2.3 Free Will vs. Determinism

Step 1: Identify DIKWP Components

DIKWP Component	Description
Data (D)	Behavioral data, neural activity related to decision-making
Information (I)	Patterns indicating free or determined actions
Knowledge (K)	Philosophical theories, neuroscientific findings
Wisdom (W)	Ethical considerations of responsibility
Purpose (P)	Understanding human agency for societal structures

Step 2: Map to the Four Spaces

Space	Mapping
Conceptual (ConC)	Concepts: Free Will (FW), Determinism (D)
Semantic (SemA)	Meanings: Libertarianism (L), Compatibilism (C), Incompatibilism (I)
Cognitive (ConN)	Functions: f1 (assess free will arguments), f2 (evaluate determinism), f3 (explore C/I)
Conscious	Emergent Properties: Sense of Agency (SA), Decision-Making Processes (DMP)

Step 3: Mathematical Representation

• Probabilistic Models: Represent uncertainty in decision-making.

• Logical Analysis: Evaluate compatibilist and incompatibilist arguments.

Step 4: Analyze Completeness and Consistency

• Completeness: Integration of philosophical and empirical insights.

• Consistency: Definitions and theories are logically consistent.

Step 5: Summarize in Table

Aspect	Details
DIKWP Components	D, I, K, W, P as identified above
Spaces Mapping	ConC: FW, D; SemA: L, C, I; ConN: f1, f2, f3; Conscious: SA, DMP
Mathematical Tools	Probabilistic Models, Logical Analysis
Completeness	Comprehensive integration of theories
Consistency	Logical coherence maintained
Overlaps	Links to Ethical Relativism, Mind-Body Problem

(Continue with the same structure for the remaining philosophical problems.)

3. Comparative Analysis and Synthesis3.1 Cross-Problem Comparison Table

Problem	Completeness	Consistency	Overlaps with Other Problems
Mind-Body Problem	High	Maintained	Hard Problem, Free Will vs. Determinism
Hard Problem of Consciousness	Challenged	Aimed for	Mind-Body Problem
Free Will vs. Determinism	High	Maintained	Ethical Relativism, Mind-Body Problem
Ethical Relativism vs. Objective Morality	High	Challenged	Political and Social Justice
Problem of Skepticism	Challenged	Maintained	Problem of Induction
Problem of Induction	Challenged	Maintained	Problem of Skepticism
Nature of Truth	High	Challenged	Philosophy of Language
Realism vs. Anti-Realism	High	Challenged	Nature of Truth, Philosophy of Language
Meaning of Life	High	Subjective	Ethical Relativism, Political and Social Justice
Role of Technology and AI	High	Maintained	Political and Social Justice, Mind-Body Problem
Political and Social Justice	High	Challenged	Ethical Relativism, Meaning of Life
Philosophy of Language	High	Maintained	Nature of Truth, Realism vs. Anti-Realism

3.2 Unified Knowledge Graph

To visualize the interconnections, we create a unified knowledge graph where:

• Nodes represent concepts from all problems.

• Edges represent relationships and overlaps.

(Due to the text format, a simplified representation is provided.)

Key Nodes and Connections:

• Consciousness connects Mind-Body Problem and Hard Problem.

• Free Will connects to Determinism and Ethical Responsibility.

• Ethics connects Ethical Relativism, Political and Social Justice, Meaning of Life.

• Truth and Language connect Nature of Truth, Philosophy of Language, Realism vs. Anti-Realism.

3.3 Integration of Mathematical Tools

• Equivalence Relations help in grouping similar concepts across different problems.

• Distance Metrics quantify differences and similarities.

• Formal Logic ensures consistency in reasoning.

Example Table: Mathematical Tools Across Problems

Mathematical Tool	Applied Problems	Purpose
Equivalence Relations	Mind-Body, Ethical Relativism, Realism	Grouping concepts and theories
Distance Metrics	Hard Problem, Free Will vs. Determinism	Measuring differences between concepts
Formal Logic	All problems	Ensuring logical consistency and validity
Probabilistic Models	Free Will, Problem of Induction	Representing uncertainty and randomness
Fuzzy Logic	Ethical Relativism, Meaning of Life	Handling degrees of truth and subjectivity

4. Application to Artificial Consciousness4.1 Designing AI Systems Based on Analysis

Step-by-Step Approach:

1. Define Concepts (ConC):

• Identify key concepts to be modeled in AI (e.g., consciousness, decision-making).

2. Assign Meanings (SemA):

• Enrich concepts with semantic information for context understanding.

3. Model Cognitive Processes (ConN):

• Implement cognitive functions that simulate reasoning and learning.

4. Simulate Emergent Properties (Conscious Space):

• Design system interactions that could lead to emergent consciousness-like properties.

Table: AI System Components and Corresponding DIKWP Elements

AI Component	DIKWP Element	Function
Perception Module	Data (D)	Collects sensory input
Interpretation Module	Information (I)	Processes and contextualizes data
Knowledge Base	Knowledge (K)	Stores structured information for reasoning
Decision-Making Module	Wisdom (W)	Applies knowledge to make informed decisions
Goal Management Module	Purpose (P)	Aligns actions with overarching objectives

4.2 Addressing Challenges

Technical Challenges and Solutions:

• Modeling Subjective Experience:

• Challenge: Difficult to represent qualia in AI.

• Solution: Use advanced models (e.g., deep learning) to simulate patterns associated with experiences.

• Ensuring Consistency:

• Challenge: Avoid contradictions in dynamic systems.

• Solution: Implement logical frameworks and validation checks.

Ethical Challenges and Solutions:

• Ethical AI Development:

• Challenge: Embedding ethical considerations in AI behavior.

• Solution: Incorporate ethical frameworks into decision-making modules.

• Conscious AI Rights:

• Challenge: Determining moral status of potentially conscious AI.

• Solution: Engage in interdisciplinary discourse to develop guidelines.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations

Summary of Findings:

• Systematic Mapping: Using DIKWP and the four spaces provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing philosophical problems.

• Interconnectedness: Philosophical problems are deeply interconnected, influencing each other's understanding.

• Mathematical Modeling: Mathematical tools facilitate the formalization and analysis of complex concepts.

Recommendations:

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encourage collaboration between philosophers, AI researchers, and cognitive scientists.

• Ethical Considerations: Prioritize the development of ethical guidelines for AI systems.

• Continued Research: Further explore the integration of emergent properties in AI to advance toward artificial consciousness.

AppendixA. Glossary of Terms

• DIKWP: An acronym for Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, Purpose.

• ConC (Conceptual Space): The space where fundamental concepts are defined.

• SemA (Semantic Space): The space where meanings are assigned to concepts.

• ConN (Cognitive Space): The space where cognitive processing occurs.

• Conscious Space: The space representing emergent properties and subjective experiences.

• Equivalence Relation (~): A relation that groups elements into equivalence classes.

• Distance Metric (δ): A function that defines a distance between elements.

• Completeness: The state of having all necessary parts or elements.

• Consistency: The state of being logical and coherent, without contradictions.

• Qualia: The subjective, qualitative properties of experiences.

B. List of Philosophical Problems Analyzed

1. Mind-Body Problem

2. Hard Problem of Consciousness

3. Free Will vs. Determinism

4. Ethical Relativism vs. Objective Morality

5. Problem of Skepticism

6. Problem of Induction

7. Nature of Truth

8. Realism vs. Anti-Realism

9. Meaning of Life

10. Role of Technology and AI

11. Political and Social Justice

12. Philosophy of Language

Note to Readers: This detailed analysis provides step-by-step reasoning and tables to elucidate the mapping and integration of philosophical problems using the DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework and the four spaces. It aims to offer clarity and depth to readers interested in the intersection of philosophy and artificial intelligence.

References for Further Reading

1. International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation (DIKWP-SC),World Association of Artificial Consciousness(WAC),World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC). Standardization of DIKWP Semantic Mathematics of International Test and Evaluation Standards for Artificial Intelligence based on Networked Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose (DIKWP ) Model. October 2024 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26233.89445 .  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384637381_Standardization_of_DIKWP_Semantic_Mathematics_of_International_Test_and_Evaluation_Standards_for_Artificial_Intelligence_based_on_Networked_Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose_DIKWP_Model

2. Duan, Y. (2023). The Paradox of Mathematics in AI Semantics. Proposed by Prof. Yucong Duan:" As Prof. Yucong Duan proposed the Paradox of Mathematics as that current mathematics will not reach the goal of supporting real AI development since it goes with the routine of based on abstraction of real semantics but want to reach the reality of semantics. ".

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自段玉聪科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3429562-1457563.html

上一篇：Philosophical Technologiza to Artificial Consciousness（初学者版）
下一篇：全球首个大语言模型人格DIKWP测评揭晓—“婚姻殿堂下LLM的选择”实验成果发布