许培扬博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/xupeiyang 跟踪国际前沿 服务国内科研

博文

自然遗传学(Nat Genet)18篇论文研究结果再现性分析

已有 3875 次阅读 2016-7-25 19:25 |个人分类:学术不端|系统分类:科研笔记



论文的替代计量得分 https://www.altmetric.com/details/118236

2009 Feb;41(2):149-55. doi: 10.1038/ng.295. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses.

Author information
  • 1Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece. jioannid@cc.uoi.gr

Abstract

Given the complexity of microarray-based gene expression studies, guidelines encourage transparent design and public data availability. Several journals require public data deposition and several public databases exist. However, not all data are publicly available, and even when available, it is unknown whether the published results are reproducible by independent scientists. Here we evaluated the replication of data analyses in 18 articles on microarray-based gene expression profiling published in Nature Genetics in 2005-2006. One table or figure from each article was independently evaluated by two teams of analysts. We reproduced two analyses in principle and six partially or with some discrepancies; ten could not be reproduced. The main reason for failure to reproduce was data unavailability, and discrepancies were mostly due to incomplete data annotation or specification of data processing and analysis. Repeatability of published microarray studies is apparently limited. More strict publication rules enforcing public data availability and explicit description of data processing and analysis should be considered.

Comment in
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

对该论文博客评论11篇:

Reputation instead of obligation: forging new policies to motivate academic data sharing.Impact of Social Sciences, 02 Jun 2015

Despite strong support from funding agencies and policy makers academic data sharing sees hardly any adoption among researchers.

Atención, pregunta: ¿Qué pruebas hay de que la mitad de la literatura científica podría ser falsa?Francis (th)E mule Science's News, 29 May 2015

De cuando en cuando vuelve a la actualidad la idea de que más de la mitad de los artículos científicos publicados podrían ser…

Reproducibility in research tweetchatDiscussions – F1000 Research, 02 Apr 2014

Recently, Cesar Berrios hosted a very successful tweetchat about diversity among researchers. You can read the summary of that…

Rewarding Reproducibility: First Papers in our Galaxy Series utilizing our GigaGalaxy platformGigaScience blog, 06 Feb 2014

Push the button! GigaScience moves toward more interactive…

A summary of the evidence that most published research is falseSimply Statistics, 16 Dec 2013

One of the hottest topics in science has two main conclusions: Most published research is…

A summary of the evidence that most published research is falseSimply Statistics, 16 Dec 2013

One of the hottest topics in science has two main conclusions: Most published research is…

Study finds many authors aren’t sharing data when they publish — and leads to a PLOS ONE retractionRetraction Watch, 30 Jan 2013

A new study in Clinical Chemistry paints an alarming picture of how often scientists deposit data that they’re supposed to …

The Comprehensive Spending Review, Food and SoftwareProfessor Douglas Kell's blog, 25 Oct 2010

Anyone with an interest in UK Science cannot fail to have been delighted at the announcement in last week’s Comprehensive…

I can not confirm thatScience Surf, 14 Jun 2009


Raising the bar for micorarray standardsNautilus - Blog Posts, 02 Feb 2009

"Investigating the compliance of our publications with MIAME standards (minimum information about a microarray experiment…




https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-280034-992727.html

上一篇:国际科学界对SCI影响因子和学术评价的最新评论
下一篇:医学科普:热射病(重症中暑)
收藏 IP: 106.37.236.*| 热度|

1 蔡小宁

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (2 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-8 08:25

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部