博文
写文章、改文章
||
很久没有写博文的感觉，干脆就乱写一气了。刚给一个博士后写的信，掐头去尾的拷上来，交差。
Thank you for sending me back the revision so fast. I added more
comments, many of which editorial. I would suggest you considering to
rewrite the literature review if possible. Can we do it by subjects, e.g.,
performance, theory, numerical methodology, experimental investigations,
and industrial applications of TLDs and ATLDs? Writing is for readers, not
for the authors. If you just provide a plain description of what other
people have done in the chronological order, why don't you just list the
references and let the readers to judge? In addition, there are a few
papers (e.g., Tait (2008) and Sun et al. (1995)) that deserve a more detailed
review.
I wish you would reconsider my previous suggestion of adding a small
section to discuss or review those key performance parameters of a TLD. I
knew that Tait (2008) already had done so. But as long as it helps the
flow of the writing and reading, we should do so. With that, we can also
avoid to review other peoples results even in 'results and discussion'
section.
At the meantime, we need to think over what major contributions this study
has made. This will help to make this paper stronger and more readable.
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-103568-503885.html
上一篇：异国拆迁的故事
下一篇：光秃秃的树丫与吴老师的飞机
Thank you for sending me back the revision so fast. I added more
comments, many of which editorial. I would suggest you considering to
rewrite the literature review if possible. Can we do it by subjects, e.g.,
performance, theory, numerical methodology, experimental investigations,
and industrial applications of TLDs and ATLDs? Writing is for readers, not
for the authors. If you just provide a plain description of what other
people have done in the chronological order, why don't you just list the
references and let the readers to judge? In addition, there are a few
papers (e.g., Tait (2008) and Sun et al. (1995)) that deserve a more detailed
review.
I wish you would reconsider my previous suggestion of adding a small
section to discuss or review those key performance parameters of a TLD. I
knew that Tait (2008) already had done so. But as long as it helps the
flow of the writing and reading, we should do so. With that, we can also
avoid to review other peoples results even in 'results and discussion'
section.
At the meantime, we need to think over what major contributions this study
has made. This will help to make this paper stronger and more readable.
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-103568-503885.html
上一篇：异国拆迁的故事
下一篇：光秃秃的树丫与吴老师的飞机
