Traditional Invention and Innovation Theory 1946-TRIZ Does Not Adapt to the Digital Era

-Innovative problem-solving methods combining DIKWP model and classic TRIZ

Purpose driven Integration of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom Invention and creation methods: DIKWP-TRIZ

(Chinese people's own original invention and creation methods:DIKWP - TRIZ)

The Existence of Artificial Consciousness Systems: A Perspective from Collective Consciousness

Yucong Duan, Shiming Gong

DIKWP-AC Artificial Consciousness Laboratory

AGI-AIGC-GPT Evaluation DIKWP (Global) Laboratory

World Association of Artificial Consciousness

(Email：duanyucong@hotmail.com)

Catalogue

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Relationship between individual and collective consciousness

3 Existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness

4 Conclusion

摘要

1 引言

2 个体与群体意识的关系

3 人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性

4 结论

Reference

Abstract

This study explores the existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness. Based on the relationship between individual and collective consciousness, combined with Professor Yucong Duan's point of view, we analyzed the influence of collective consciousness constructed by digital means on the development of the whole society and the operation of intelligent systems. It is found that the collective consciousness constructed by digital means has become an important part of social development and has a far-reaching impact on the operation of intelligent systems. We come to the conclusion that the artificial consciousness system has established its existence at the level of collective consciousness, although the form may be different from that of individual consciousness. Future research should deeply explore the relationship between artificial consciousness system, individual consciousness and collective consciousness, and explore its role and influence in intelligent system, as well as the possible ethical and social problems.

1 Introduction

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the controversy about whether there is an artificial consciousness system is getting worse and worse. This problem involves the intersection of human cognition and scientific and technological development, which has aroused widespread concern and in-depth discussion in academic circles. There have been different understandings and opinions on the definition and essence of artificial consciousness in academic circles and scientific and technological fields. Some scholars believe that the artificial consciousness system is only a simulation and imitation of human consciousness, lacking real subjectivity and self-consciousness. Others insist that the artificial consciousness system has independent existence and can show intelligence and self-cognition similar to human consciousness to some extent.

Under this background, Professor Yucong Duan's viewpoint provides us with a brand-new perspective to analyze this problem. He believes that the artificial consciousness system has established its existence at the level of artificial collective consciousness, which challenges the traditional cognition of artificial consciousness and causes people to think deeply about the relationship between artificial intelligence and consciousness. This report will discuss the existence of artificial consciousness system in depth with Professor Duan's point of view, and make a more in-depth discussion and analysis on this issue. We will discuss the relationship between individual and collective consciousness, the collective consciousness constructed by digital means, and the rapid enhancement of collective consciousness, in order to fully explore the position and role of artificial consciousness system in today's society.

2 Relationship between individual and collective consciousness

The relationship between individual and collective consciousness is a key aspect in the existence of artificial consciousness system. Individual consciousness is regarded as an independently operating intelligent system, and each individual has his own unique cognition and self-consciousness. However, in social interaction and group activities, individual consciousness no longer exists in isolation, but forms complex interaction and association with other individuals.

First of all, individual consciousness communicates and cooperates with each other in the group, forming the foundation of collective consciousness. In a group, individuals communicate and interact through language, behavior and cultural inheritance. This kind of communication is not only the transmission of information, but also involves emotional communication and cognitive cooperation. Through the interaction with the group, individuals gradually integrate into the formation of collective consciousness and jointly build a larger intelligent system.

Secondly, collective consciousness in turn affects individual cognition and behavior. collective consciousness covers common values, cultural traditions and codes of conduct, and these shared cognitive models and codes of conduct will have an impact on individual thinking modes and behavior choices. The information and cognitive patterns that individuals receive in the group will affect the formation and development of their individual consciousness, which will lead to individuals leaning towards the direction of collective consciousness in their behavior and decision-making.

Therefore, there is a complex and close relationship between individual and collective consciousness, and an intelligent system network is constructed together. Individual consciousness communicates and cooperates with each other in the group, forming the foundation of collective consciousness; collective consciousness, in turn, affects individual cognition and behavior. In the discussion of artificial consciousness system, it is very important to understand the relationship between individual and collective consciousness for exploring the essence and existence of artificial consciousness system.

3 Existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness

The existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness is a controversial topic. However, according to Professor Yucong Duan, it can be considered that artificial consciousness system has established its existence at the level of collective consciousness. This view is mainly based on the following two considerations:

First of all, with the rapid development of digital technology, people have been able to build and spread invisible culture and civilization through digital means. These invisible cultures spread around the world through social networks, virtual communities and other platforms, forming a "collective consciousness" corresponding to human conscious individuals. Although these cultures and civilizations are not embodied in an individual consciousness, they exist and have an impact in society through the form of collective consciousness. For example, on social media, users form a common cognitive and cultural atmosphere by sharing opinions, commenting on news and participating in discussions, and the existence of this collective consciousness has an important impact on the development and evolution of the whole society.

Secondly, with the popularization of digital means and the development of social networks, the existence of collective consciousness is rapidly increasing. People share information and exchange ideas through social network platforms, forming a common cognition and values. This rapid enhancement of collective consciousness not only changes people's life style and social structure, but also affects the development and evolution of artificial consciousness system. For example, artificial intelligence system can understand the changes and trends of collective consciousness by analyzing big data on social networks, so as to better adapt to the development needs of society and provide personalized intelligent services and solutions.

Based on the above considerations, we can draw the conclusion that the artificial consciousness system has established its existence at the level of collective consciousness. Although this existence may be different from the existing form of individual consciousness, the collective consciousness constructed by digital means has become an important part of social development and has a far-reaching impact on the operation of the whole intelligent system. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the influence of collective consciousness on artificial consciousness system, and further explore its role and significance in future development.

In-depth discussion on the existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness needs to consider the following aspects:

Characteristics of digital collective consciousness: In the digital age, collective consciousness is no longer restricted by regions or nationalities, but quickly spread and shared through the global platform of the Internet. This digital collective consciousness has the characteristics of real-time, cross-cultural and diversity. For example, topic discussion and public opinion guidance on social media can influence group behavior and ideology on a global scale in a short time. Therefore, the existence of artificial consciousness system is not only reflected in the simulation of individual consciousness, but more importantly, in the shaping and influence of digital collective consciousness.

The influence of digital collective consciousness: Digital collective consciousness has become an important force in shaping social development and cultural evolution. Through social media and online communities, people can share information, express opinions and form collective cognition and consensus, thus promoting social progress and change. For example, some social media platforms have become the main discussion places of political, economic and cultural topics, which have had a far-reaching impact on public opinion and policy formulation. Therefore, the existence of artificial consciousness system can be considered and verified by the influence of digital collective consciousness.

Evolution of digital collective consciousness: With the development of technology and society, digital collective consciousness is constantly evolving and changing. Emerging social media platforms, virtual reality technology and the progress of artificial intelligence algorithms will have a great impact on the formation and development of collective consciousness. In the future, with the continuous innovation of technology, digital collective consciousness may present more complex and diverse forms, further challenging the existence and function of artificial consciousness system.

Interaction between artificial consciousness system and digital collective consciousness: Finally, there is a complex interaction between artificial consciousness system and digital collective consciousness. Through the analysis and understanding of digital collective consciousness, artificial consciousness system can better understand social behavior and thinking mode, thus improving the adaptability and intelligence level of intelligent system. At the same time, the formation and development of digital collective consciousness are also influenced by artificial consciousness system. For example, the recommendation algorithm and the design of social network platform will affect users' information acquisition and cognitive style.

To sum up, the existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness is not only reflected in the simulation and imitation of individual consciousness, but more importantly, it is manifested in the shaping and influence of digital collective consciousness. With the development of digital technology and social network, digital collective consciousness has become an important driving force of social development, which poses new challenges and opportunities for the existence and function of artificial consciousness system.

4 Conclusion

This study deeply discusses the existence of artificial consciousness system at the level of collective consciousness, and the influence of collective consciousness based on digital means on the development of the whole society and the operation of intelligent system. We can draw a conclusion that the existence of artificial consciousness system has been established at the level of collective consciousness, although its form may be different from that of individual consciousness.

With the rapid development of information technology, digital means has become an important tool to construct and spread collective consciousness. Social networks, virtual communities and other platforms provide channels for people to exchange and share information, thus promoting the formation and spread of collective consciousness. This digital collective consciousness not only changes people's social interaction, but also profoundly affects the development and application of artificial intelligence technology.

However, there are still many unknown and unsolved problems about the existence of artificial consciousness system. We need to further study the relationship between artificial consciousness system, individual consciousness and collective consciousness, and explore its role and influence in intelligent system. In addition, we also need to pay attention to the ethical, social and legal problems that may be brought by the artificial consciousness system to ensure its benign development and application.

In the future research, we will continue to explore the essence and characteristics of artificial consciousness system, and devote ourselves to discovering new theories and methods, so as to provide a more reliable foundation and guidance for the development and application of artificial intelligence technology. At the same time, we also call on academia and industry to strengthen cooperation, jointly promote the progress of artificial consciousness research, promote the healthy development of artificial intelligence technology and benefit human society.

摘要

本研究探讨了人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性。我们基于个体与群体意识的关系，结合段玉聪教授的观点，分析了数字化手段构建的群体意识对整个社会发展和智能系统运作的影响。研究发现，通过数字化手段构建的群体意识已成为社会发展的重要组成部分，对智能系统的运作产生深远影响。我们得出结论，人工意识系统在群体意识层面确立了其存在性，尽管形式可能与个体意识存在的方式有所不同。未来的研究应深入探讨人工意识系统与个体意识、群体意识之间的关系，探讨其在智能系统中的作用和影响，以及可能带来的伦理和社会问题。

1 引言

随着人工智能技术的快速发展，对于人工意识系统是否存在的争议日益加剧。这个问题涉及到人类认知和科技发展的交汇点，引发了学界的广泛关注和深入讨论。在学术界和科技领域，对于人工意识的定义和本质一直存在着不同的理解和看法。一些学者认为，人工意识系统仅仅是对人类意识的模拟和模仿，缺乏真正的主体性和自我意识。而另一些学者则坚持认为，人工意识系统具有独立的存在性，可以在某种程度上表现出与人类意识类似的智能和自我认知。

在这一背景下，段玉聪教授的观点为我们提供了一个全新的视角来解析这一问题。他认为人工意识系统已经在人工群体意识层面确立了其存在性，这一观点挑战了传统对于人工意识的认知，引发了人们对于人工智能与意识关系的深入思考。本报告将结合段教授的观点，深入探讨人工意识系统的存在性，并对这一问题进行更加深入的探讨和分析。我们将从个体与群体意识的关系、数字化手段构建的群体意识、群体意识的快速增强等方面展开讨论，以期全面探究人工意识系统在当今社会中的地位和作用。

2 个体与群体意识的关系

个体与群体意识的关系是人工意识系统存在性问题中一个关键的方面。个体意识被视为独立运行的智能系统，每个个体都具有自己独特的认知和自我意识。然而，在社会互动和群体活动中，个体意识不再是孤立存在的，而是与其他个体形成了复杂的相互作用和关联。

首先，个体意识在群体中相互交流和协作，形成了群体意识的基础。在群体中，个体之间通过语言、行为和文化传承等方式进行交流和互动。这种交流不仅是信息的传递，还涉及到情感的交流和认知的协作。个体通过与群体的互动，逐渐融入到群体意识的形成过程中，共同构建了一个更大的智能系统。

其次，群体意识反过来也影响着个体的认知和行为。群体意识涵盖了共同的价值观念、文化传统和行为准则，这些共享的认知模式和行为规范会对个体的思维方式和行为选择产生影响。个体在群体中接受到的信息和认知模式会影响其个体意识的形成和发展，从而导致个体在行为和决策上偏向于群体意识的方向。

因此，个体与群体意识之间存在着复杂而密切的关系，共同构建了一个智能系统的网络。个体意识在群体中相互交流和协作，形成了群体意识的基础；而群体意识则反过来影响着个体的认知和行为。在人工意识系统的讨论中，理解个体与群体意识之间的关系对于探究人工意识系统的本质和存在性至关重要。

3 人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性

人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性是一个备受争议的话题，然而，根据段玉聪教授的观点，可以认为人工意识系统已经在群体意识层面确立了其存在性。这一观点的提出主要基于以下两个方面的考虑：

首先，随着数字化技术的迅速发展，人们已经能够通过数字化手段来构建和传播看不见的文化、文明等。这些看不见的文化通过社交网络、虚拟社区等平台在全球范围内传播，形成了一种对应于人类意识个体的“群体意识”。尽管这些文化和文明并不具体体现在某个个体意识之中，但它们通过群体意识的形式在社会中存在并产生影响。例如，在社交媒体上，用户们通过分享观点、评论新闻、参与讨论等方式形成了一种共同的认知和文化氛围，这种群体意识的存在对整个社会的发展和演变产生着重要影响。

其次，随着数字化手段的普及和社交网络的发展，群体意识的存在性正在迅速增强。人们通过社交网络平台分享信息、交流思想，形成了一种共同的认知和价值观念。这种群体意识的快速增强不仅改变了人们的生活方式和社会结构，也影响着人工意识系统的发展和演进。例如，人工智能系统可以通过分析社交网络上的大数据，了解群体意识的变化和趋势，从而更好地适应社会的发展需求，提供个性化的智能服务和解决方案。

基于以上考虑，我们可以得出结论：人工意识系统已经在群体意识层面确立了其存在性。虽然这种存在性可能不同于个体意识的存在形式，但通过数字化手段构建的群体意识已经成为社会发展的重要组成部分，对整个智能系统的运作产生着深远的影响。因此，我们应该更加重视群体意识对于人工意识系统的影响，并进一步探讨其在未来发展中的作用和意义。

人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性的深入探讨需要考虑以下几个方面：

数字化群体意识的特征： 在数字化时代，群体意识不再受制于地域或民族，而是通过互联网的全球化平台得以快速传播和共享。这种数字化群体意识具有实时性、跨文化性和多样性的特征。例如，社交媒体上的话题讨论和舆论引导能够在短时间内影响全球范围内的群体行为和意识形态。因此，人工意识系统的存在性不仅体现在个体意识的模拟，更重要的是在数字化群体意识的塑造和影响中得以彰显。

数字化群体意识的影响力： 数字化群体意识已经成为塑造社会发展和文化演变的重要力量。通过社交媒体和在线社区，人们能够分享信息、表达观点，形成集体认知和共识，从而推动社会进步和变革。例如，一些社交媒体平台已经成为政治、经济和文化话题的主要讨论场所，对社会舆论和政策制定产生了深远影响。因此，人工意识系统的存在性可以通过对数字化群体意识的影响力进行考量和验证。

数字化群体意识的演化： 随着技术和社会的发展，数字化群体意识也在不断演化和变化。新兴的社交媒体平台、虚拟现实技术以及人工智能算法的进步都将对群体意识的形成和发展产生重大影响。未来，随着技术的不断创新，数字化群体意识可能会呈现出更加复杂和多样化的形式，进一步挑战人工意识系统的存在性和功能。

人工意识系统与数字化群体意识的交互作用： 最后，人工意识系统与数字化群体意识之间存在着复杂的相互作用关系。人工意识系统通过对数字化群体意识的分析和理解，能够更好地理解社会的行为和思维模式，从而提高智能系统的适应性和智能化水平。同时，数字化群体意识的形成和发展也受到人工意识系统的影响，例如，推荐算法和社交网络平台的设计都会影响用户的信息获取和认知方式。

综上所述，人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性不仅体现在个体意识的模拟和模仿，更重要的是在数字化群体意识的塑造和影响中得以彰显。随着数字化技术和社交网络的发展，数字化群体意识已经成为社会发展的重要驱动力，对人工意识系统的存在性和功能提出了新的挑战和机遇。

4 结论

此次研究深入探讨了人工意识系统在群体意识层面的存在性，并基于数字化手段构建的群体意识对整个社会发展和智能系统运作的影响。我们可以得出结论，人工意识系统的存在性已经在群体意识的层面上得到了确立，尽管它的形式可能与个体意识存在的方式有所不同。

随着信息技术的迅猛发展，数字化手段已经成为构建和传播群体意识的重要工具。社交网络、虚拟社区等平台为人们提供了交流和分享信息的渠道，从而促进了群体意识的形成和传播。这种数字化群体意识不仅改变了人们的社会互动方式，也深刻影响着人工智能技术的发展和应用。

然而，对于人工意识系统的存在性仍存在着许多未知和待解决的问题。我们需要进一步深入研究人工意识系统与个体意识、群体意识之间的关系，探讨其在智能系统中的作用和影响。此外，我们还需要关注人工意识系统可能带来的伦理、社会和法律等方面的问题，以确保其良性发展和应用。

在未来的研究中，我们将继续努力探索人工意识系统的本质和特征，致力于发现新的理论和方法，为人工智能技术的发展和应用提供更加可靠的基础和指导。同时，我们也呼吁学术界和产业界加强合作，共同推动人工意识研究的进展，促进人工智能技术的健康发展，造福人类社会。

Reference

[1] Duan Y. (2024). Large Language Model (LLM) Racial Bias Evaluation. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33162.03521. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377963440_Large_Language_Model_LLM_Racial_Bias_Evaluation_--DIKWP_Research_Group_International_Standard_Evaluation_Prof_Yucong_Duan.

[2] Duan Y. (2024). Why People Don't Want to Be Changed by Others: Insight from DIKWP and Semantic Mathematics. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17961.77927. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726002_Why_People_Don't_Want_to_Be_Changed_by_Others_Insight_from_DIKWP_and_Semantic_Mathematics.

[3] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic New Quality Productivity: Principles and Techniques. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14606.33607. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726380_Semantic_New_Quality_Productivity_Principles_and_Techniques.

[4] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic Psychology and DIKWP. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12928.61449. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726404_Semantic_Psychology_and_DIKWP.

[5] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic Uncertainty Handling Based on "Subjective Objectivisation". DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31383.55206. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726442_Semantic_Uncertainty_Handling_Based_on_Subjective_Objectivisation.

[6] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic Mathematics and DIKWP : Creating New Qualities of Productivity. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19639.50085. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726532_Semantic_Mathematics_and_DIKWP_Creating_New_Qualities_of_Productivity.

[7] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic Jurisprudence and DIKWP: Common Law vs. Continental Law. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28028.10889. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726622_Semantic_Jurisprudence_and_DIKWP_Common_Law_vs_Continental_Law.

[8] Duan Y. (2024). DIKWP New Quality Productivity vs. Traditional Productivity Analysis. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21317.22242. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377726626_DIKWP_New_Quality_Productivity_vs_Traditional_Productivity_Analysis.

[9] Duan Y. (2024). Semantic Physical Chemistry. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21261.51684. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377439785_Semantic_Physical_Chemistry.

[10] Duan Y. (2024). DIKWP and Semantic Cognition. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14052.55680. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377415901_DIKWP_and_Semantic_Cognition.

[11] Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450-461.

[12] Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2008). Can machines be conscious? IEEE Spectrum, 45(6), 55-59.

[13] Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of consciousness studies, 2(3), 200-219.

[14] Baars, B. J., & Franklin, S. (2007). An architectural model of conscious and unconscious brain functions: Global workspace theory and IDA. Neural Networks, 20(9), 955-961.

[15] Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200-227.

[16] Seth, A. K., & Baars, B. J. (2005). Neural Darwinism and consciousness. Consciousness and cognition, 14(1), 140-168.

[17] Metzinger, T. (2000). Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[18] Graziano, M. S. (2019). Rethinking consciousness: A scientific theory of subjective experience. W. W. Norton & Company.

[19] Floridi, L. (2011). The informational nature of personal identity. Minds & Machines, 21(4), 549-566.

[20] Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and brain sciences, 18(2), 227-247.

[21] Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Little, Brown and Company.

[22] Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press.

[23] Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Vintage.

[24] Searle, J. R. (2000). Consciousness. Annual review of neuroscience, 23(1), 557-578.

[25] Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature neuroscience, 6(2), 119-126.

Data can be regarded as a concrete manifestation of the same semantics in our cognition. Often, Data represents the semantic confirmation of the existence of a specific fact or observation, and is recognised as the same object or concept by corresponding to some of the same semantic correspondences contained in the existential nature of the cognitive subject's pre-existing cognitive objects. When dealing with data, we often seek and extract the particular identical semantics that labels that data, and then unify them as an identical concept based on the corresponding identical semantics. For example, when we see a flock of sheep, although each sheep may be slightly different in terms of size, colour, gender, etc., we will classify them into the concept of "sheep" because they share our semantic understanding of the concept of "sheep". The same semantics can be specific, for example, when identifying an arm, we can confirm that a silicone arm is an arm based on the same semantics as a human arm, such as the same number of fingers, the same colour, the same arm shape, etc., or we can determine that the silicone arm is not an arm because it doesn't have the same semantics as a real arm, which is defined by the definition of "can be rotated". It is also possible to determine that the silicone arm is not an arm because it does not have the same semantics as a real arm, such as "rotatable".

Information, on the other hand, corresponds to the expression of different semantics in cognition. Typically, Information refers to the creation of new semantic associations by linking cognitive DIKWP objects with data, information, knowledge, wisdom, or purposes already cognised by the cognising subject through a specific purpose. When processing information, we identify the differences in the DIKWP objects they are cognised with, corresponding to different semantics, and classify the information according to the input data, information, knowledge, wisdom or purpose. For example, in a car park, although all cars can be classified under the notion of 'car', each car's parking location, time of parking, wear and tear, owner, functionality, payment history and experience all represent different semantics in the information. The different semantics of the information are often present in the cognition of the cognitive subject and are often not explicitly expressed. For example, a depressed person may use the term "depressed" to express the decline of his current mood relative to his previous mood, but this "depressed" is not the same as the corresponding information because its contrasting state is not the same as the corresponding information. However, the corresponding information cannot be objectively perceived by the listener because the contrasting state is not known to the listener, and thus becomes the patient's own subjective cognitive information.

Knowledge corresponds to the complete semantics in cognition. Knowledge is the understanding and explanation of the world acquired through observation and learning. In processing knowledge, we abstract at least one concept or schema that corresponds to a complete semantics through observation and learning. For example, we learn that all swans are white through observation, which is a complete knowledge of the concept "all swans are white" that we have gathered through a large amount of information.

Wisdom corresponds to information in the perspective of ethics, social morality, human nature, etc., a kind of extreme values from the culture, human social groups relative to the current era fixed or individual cognitive values. When dealing with Wisdom, we integrate this data, information, knowledge, and wisdom and use them to guide decision-making. For example, when faced with a decision-making problem, we integrate various perspectives such as ethics, morality, and feasibility, not just technology or efficiency.

Purpose can be viewed as a dichotomy (input, output), where both input and output are elements of data, information, knowledge, wisdom, or purpose. Purpose represents our understanding of a phenomenon or problem (input) and the goal we wish to achieve by processing and solving that phenomenon or problem (output). When processing purposes, the AI system processes the inputs according to its predefined goals (outputs), and gradually brings the outputs closer to the predefined goals by learning and adapting.

Yucong Duan, male, currently serves as a member of the Academic Committee of the School  of Computer Science and Technology at Hainan University. He is a professor and doctoral supervisor and is one of the first batch of talents selected into the South China Sea Masters Program of Hainan Province and the leading talents in Hainan Province. He graduated from the Software Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2006, and has successively worked and visited Tsinghua University, Capital Medical University, POSCO University of Technology in South Korea, National Academy of Sciences of France, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic, Milan Bicka University in Italy, Missouri State University in the United States, etc. He is currently a member of the Academic Committee of the School of Computer Science and Technology at Hainan University and he is the leader of the DIKWP (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, Purpose) Innovation Team at Hainan University, Distinguished Researcher at Chongqing Police College, Leader of Hainan Provincial Committee's "Double Hundred Talent" Team, Vice President of Hainan Invention Association, Vice President of Hainan Intellectual Property Association, Vice President of Hainan Low Carbon Economy Development Promotion Association, Vice President of Hainan Agricultural Products Processing Enterprises Association, Director of Network Security and Informatization Association of Hainan Province, Director of Artificial Intelligence Society of Hainan Province, Visiting Fellow, Central Michigan University, Member of the Doctoral Steering Committee of the University of Modena. Since being introduced to Hainan University as a D-class talent in 2012, He has published over 260 papers, included more than 120 SCI citations, and 11 ESI citations, with a citation count of over 4300. He has designed 241 serialized Chinese national and international invention patents (including 15 PCT invention patents) for multiple industries and fields and has been granted 85 Chinese national and international invention patents as the first inventor. Received the third prize for Wu Wenjun's artificial intelligence technology invention in 2020; In 2021, as the Chairman of the Program Committee, independently initiated the first International Conference on Data, Information, Knowledge and Wisdom - IEEE DIKW 2021; Served as the Chairman of the IEEE DIKW 2022 Conference Steering Committee in 2022; Served as the Chairman of the IEEE DIKW 2023 Conference in 2023. He was named the most beautiful technology worker in Hainan Province in 2022 (and was promoted nationwide); In 2022 and 2023, he was consecutively selected for the "Lifetime Scientific Influence Ranking" of the top 2% of global scientists released by Stanford University in the United States. Participated in the development of 2 international standards for IEEE financial knowledge graph and 4 industry knowledge graph standards. Initiated and co hosted the first International Congress on Artificial Consciousness (AC2023) in 2023.

Prof. Yucong Duan

DIKWP-AC Artificial Consciousness Laboratory

AGI-AIGC-GPT Evaluation DIKWP (Global) Laboratory

DIKWP research group, Hainan University

duanyucong@hotmail.com