博文
不负责任的拒稿意见
|||
稿件被审稿人拒绝，再也正常不过了。不过有的审稿人实在可恶，写出不负责任的拒稿意见。以下就是几例这样的审稿意见。
1) Although the results seem interesting and correct, the ideas and methods are standard and the results and examples are simple. Hence I do not think this paper deserves to be published in XX.
2) The studied problem is interesting, but, overall, the paper does not reach the high standards of XX.
3) The argument here is standard and not suprizing. the paper does not meet the high standards of XX.
4) Although the paper has some merit it does not contain new ideas. Most of the ideas have appeared in the literature. As a result the paper does not meet the standards of XX.
5) The argument in Section 3 is standard (once the results in Section 2 are derived). Many authors are now presenting results similar to section 2. Unfortunately this paper does not meet the HIGH standards of XX.
投稿与审稿
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-116820-494446.html
上一篇：神奇的国度
下一篇：“被”进英语
扫一扫，分享此博文
全部作者的其他最新博文
- • 哈代的名言
- • 小结果, 大用处(一)
- • 测试一下LaTeX
- • 83108
- • 调和级数发散性的简短证明
- • 无语