CTB11的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/CTB11

博文

见过的最无语的审稿意见

已有 8008 次阅读 2014-3-29 16:26 |系统分类:论文交流

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.


Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No


2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?


Reviewer #3: No


Please explain (optional).

Reviewer #3: It was not sufficiently documented how the analyses were performed, and what their precise meaning is.


3. Does the manuscript adhere to standards in this field for data availability?

Authors must follow field-specific standards for data deposition in publicly available resources and should include accession numbers in the manuscript when relevant. The manuscript should explain what steps have been taken to make data available, particularly in cases where the data cannot be publicly deposited.


Reviewer #3: No


4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors below.


Reviewer #3: No



Please explain (optional).


Reviewer #3: The manuscript contains an unacceptable large number of grammatical errors and is therefore difficult to follow.



这篇文章最后被接受了。。



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-927304-780237.html

上一篇:定量生物学需要的三个软件
下一篇:作为算法的中医
收藏 IP: 124.205.76.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (2 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2023-5-30 08:33

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部