whlbus的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/whlbus

博文

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology网上全文欢迎下载阅读

已有 3242 次阅读 2016-4-29 18:55 |系统分类:论文交流


关于植被用水量对环境因子响应的问题研究。网上可见后附加链接和校正后的文章,现在是提交的修改稿。欢迎指教!


Wang et al. 2016. Agr_For_Meteo.pdf



Brief background and objectives

Tree water use (Ec) models used in this studyinclude (1) Penman-Monteith equation with the canopy conductance (gc) simulated from theJarvis-Stewart (JS) approach, denoted as PMJS; (2)models modified from the JS approach that correlate Ec directly withenvironmental variables, omitting the calculation of gc, denoted as MJS; and (3) a simplified process basedmodel by Buckley et al., (2012), denoted as BTA. Tree water use is constrained bythe root-zone water supply and atmospheric demand (solar radiation, airtemperature and humidity, and wind speed) factors. Many studies estimated Ec or gc considering both supply and demand factors, whilesome only included the demand factors. In addition, soil water availability hasseasonal variations in most cases in correspondence with precipitation, and airtemperature is often neglected in Ecmodels when humidity is used as one variable in previous studies.

Therefore, thisstudy compared selected Ecmodels, with the emphasis on the following questions for a better understandingof the responses of Ec toenvironmental variables:

(1) Which type ofEc models performs betterat different temporal scales (hourly and daily)?

(2) Are soilwater availability and air temperature functions critical for Ec simulation?

(3) At which timescale and in which season do soil water condition and air temperature functionspose a stronger influence on Ecmodeling; and

(4) Are parametervalues transferable across different temporal scales (daily and hourly) for thesame Ec model?

Major conclusions

Themodified JS and process based models gave generally better simulations than thePM models at both daily and hourly scales. The models constructed with fourenvironmental variables outperform the ones with a reduced number of variables.At the daily scale, the best PM model performs comparable to the best MJSmodel. The major advantage of the MJS and BTA models is the simplicity in termsof inputs and number of parameters, thus have potential for wide applicationsin land surface models for evapotranspiration estimation. BTA model has theleast number of parameters and sound physical interpretations of plantphysiology. However, BTA failed on the tree under water stress at the dailyscale due to its treatment of soil water availability and other factors as anintegrated parameter.

Soilwater availability function is important for Ec simulation at both temporal scales, particularly atthe daily scale. For hourly Ecmodeling the soil water function can be omitted in spring time in this studywhen there was sufficient water in the root-zone soil for vegetation wateruptake. The influence of an air temperature function on model performancevaries. Parameter values showed divergence across models and temporal scales,calling for attention to model application across temporal scales. At thehourly scale, parameters are better to be calibrated for each season ratherthan calibrated for all seasons for the improvement of long-term total treewater use modeling.









https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-700639-973684.html

上一篇:节水灌溉
下一篇:苏格兰源头流域赤松对环境变化的响应及对水量平衡的影响研究
收藏 IP: 139.133.86.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-23 18:20

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部