博文
ISSI2023评审要求
|
| Contribution of the Submission | Please outline briefly the main contribution of this submission. | ||
Awarding of Points Based on Various Criteria | |||
| * Quality of Content 10% | * Quality of Content 10% 10 - Excellent work and a significant contribution 08 - Good work, significant 06 - Solid work 04 - Weak content 02 - Only an insignificant contribution 00 - Questionable work | ||
| * Significance for Theory or Practice 10% | * Significance for Theory or Practice 10% 10 - Very significant 08 - Significant 06 - Not bad 04 - Low significance 02 - Only of marginal significance 00 - Absolutely insignificant | ||
| * Originality and Level of Innovativeness 10% | * Originality and Level of Innovativeness 10% 10 - Groundbreaking 08 - A pioneer work 06 - One step forward 04 - Better works on the same topic exist 02 - This has been said several times 00 - Outdated work | ||
| * Thematic Relevance for the "Call for Papers" 10% | * Thematic Relevance for the "Call for Papers" 10% 10 - Appropriate to the point 08 - Definitely relevant 06 - Close enough 04 - Relevance is questionable 02 - Not so relevant 00 - Definitely unsuitable | ||
| * Quality of Presentation 10% | * Quality of Presentation 10% 10 - Excellently written 08 - Well written 06 - Legible 04 - Needs some revision 02 - Requires considerable work 00 - Not acceptable | ||
Decisive Overall Recommendation | |||
| * Overall recommendation 50% | * Overall recommendation 50% 10 - Definitely accept (very high quality) 09 08 - Probably accept (good quality) 07 06 - Lean towards acceptance (borderline quality) 05 04 - Lean towards rejection (low quality) 03 02 - Probably reject (minor quality) 01 00 - Definitely reject (has no merit) | ||
Comments on the Submission | |||
| Comments for the Authors | Please explain your evaluation in a detailed and clear manner. Point out strengths and weaknesses of the submitted contribution. Please also provide suggestions for improvement and use an objective and constructive writing style. | ||
Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic | |||
| * Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic | * Familiarity of the reviewer with the topic 10 - Very familiar with the topic, my area of expertise 08 - Good knowledge 06 - More or less familiar 04 - Only marginally familiar 02 - Not really familiar 00 - Completely new to me | ||
Information for the program committee | |||
| Recommended as Poster | Recommended as Poster Do you recommend accepting this submission as poster only? | ||
| Major Revision Required | Major Revision Required This submissions requires major rework before it can be accepted. | ||
| Veto Against Acceptance | Veto Against Acceptance Do you have major objections against the acceptance of this submission? | ||
 | |||
| Internal comments | These comments are only for the chairs and members of the program committee (PC) and will not be passed on to authors. | ||
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-215715-1370945.html
上一篇：经济学类期刊
下一篇：[转载]刑法修正案网址
