||
拒稿信:
I regret to inform you that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in AESCTE. The primary concern is the relevance of this work relative to the state-of-the-art. A quick search reveals that vision-based odometry is heavily used on MERs, with far better accuracy than that proposed in this manuscript. In your manuscript, there is no comparison with this state-of-the-art technology for odometry.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,
可是vision-based odometry 是相对定位,在一张相片内的定位精度是很高,但是相片的绝对位置是不知道的(或者精度很低,超过几公里)。而我的新方法是绝对定位,位置误差低于170m。绝对定位和相对定位如何比较?编辑误解了?
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-9-27 11:04
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社