关于叶诗文夺冠是否服用禁药，最近一直都是西方那些猴子媒体们热烈讨论的对象，连Nature的News上也发表了一篇相关的文章，题为“Why great Olympic feats raise suspicions ”（原文链接：http://www.nature.com/news/why-great-olympic-feats-raise-suspicions-1.11109），讲述叶诗文夺冠是如何如何不可能。文章列举错误数据，误导人们思想。不过相关的一些错误也被Nature的编辑在最近作出了修改，但是该文的存在本身就是一个错误。

该文发表短期内便引发了轩然大波。。。发表后得到的关注一直上升，评论不断增加。不过增加的同时，也有一些评论在“悄悄地”消失，有点像我朝作风。。。。评论中亮点不断，各种讨论，各种争吵。

摘了一些比较经典的评论放在这里，否则明天又找不到了。。。

1. AllanMcNish said: It is disturbing that Nature.com is deliberately deletingcomments, the same feat Big Brothers in Communist China have been doing.（这都知道，神人啊~~~）

2. This article is obviously full of scientific flaws and false data, why it can bepublished on Nature?（这才是科学家作风哈哈）

3. Thisis the last time I visit Nature. Not that I have turned into a Nature hater,but my time will be better spent at other places where I can find real scienceinstead of hyped fabrications.（瞧人家这气魄。。。）

4. It'sa shame for Nature to publish such an article with a lot of biased andmisleading information and absolutely no fact support.（绝对支持你言论啊。。。It’s really a shame）

5. Enochsaid: During these days I see not only the decay of Olympic spirit but also thecorrupt of scientific spirit in UK! What a shame on Nature!（是啊，伦敦的奥运精神和科学精神都他妹的令人汗颜啊）

还有神级的评论：

1、B Stone said: “Is thisarticle published in Nature?” “Yes.” “Really?” “Really.”

2、Elaine Kim said: Iappreciate all the scientific comments here.
So why did Nature publish the unscientific news?
The only reason is that, it comes from London, GBR. （是的，完全正确，Nature为嘛发表非科学的呢？因为它来自伦敦，大不列颠。哈哈。（注：纯属戏言）

3、还有个笑话：

Monkey: Donkey, this is the best summer Ihave ever had.
Donkey: what made you so excited?
Monkey: Something in London, for sure.
Donkey: I know, the Olympics.
Monkey: hey, I am not the sport guy. I just can do a little bit better inclimbing.
Donkey: then what?
Monkey: I found the biggest science shit in the world.
Donkey: Come on, my mum always ask me to eat more. You know.
Monkey: serious, I am not joking at all.
Donkey: what are you talking about?
Monkey: Nature.

笔者小注： Nature的这个新闻确实像一坨屎。。。。跟伦敦奥运有的一拼哈~~~

不仅仅是这些针对Nature杂志以及调侃的评论，该文还引发了中外科学家有关中国是否透明的争论。。。妹啊，辐射面真是广。。。。