博文
答网友史雄伟博士（续）
|||
现将史雄伟博士对我的博文“答网友史雄伟博士”发表的看法，涉及宇宙、物质结构和科学方法等问题，以及我的回复摘录如下，供有兴趣的网友参考。
[1]xshi
Thanks professor Luo!
I have been watch to all of news from Sciencenet so actually read every piece of news from physics world. I have a very strong feeling that the level of physics is aproaching average. I want to help but I just do not know how.
As for your hygrogen model, if you do not have a very good knowledge of the universe, and how these materials are formed in the nature, how do you establish good models for them? I think this is a very hard task for you to do well (it need much more effort).
Here, I would like to point out (if you do not mind) that nearly all of the prominent physicists are problem children except for very rare few. If you decide to do your model well, you need to rely on your own 100%, you even cannot rely on or even compare classic models as well; they have problem too! That's why I say your job is very hard if you continue.
Finally, I would like to say that
作为量子力学的波动形式的薛定谔方程，为我们解释微观结构问题提供了精确数学工具，通过其求解和推论，可以精确地解释微观结构和光谱现象，其地位如同经典力学中的牛顿定律
Do not believe it. You can only believe yourself in your work!
I think if you want to do really well in physics, you should organize to handle them piece by piece and finally assemble them together to form a system to serve for the whole world.
You can have your paper published and gradually improve!
I have been watch to all of news from Sciencenet so actually read every piece of news from physics world. I have a very strong feeling that the level of physics is aproaching average. I want to help but I just do not know how.
As for your hygrogen model, if you do not have a very good knowledge of the universe, and how these materials are formed in the nature, how do you establish good models for them? I think this is a very hard task for you to do well (it need much more effort).
Here, I would like to point out (if you do not mind) that nearly all of the prominent physicists are problem children except for very rare few. If you decide to do your model well, you need to rely on your own 100%, you even cannot rely on or even compare classic models as well; they have problem too! That's why I say your job is very hard if you continue.
Finally, I would like to say that
作为量子力学的波动形式的薛定谔方程，为我们解释微观结构问题提供了精确数学工具，通过其求解和推论，可以精确地解释微观结构和光谱现象，其地位如同经典力学中的牛顿定律
Do not believe it. You can only believe yourself in your work!
I think if you want to do really well in physics, you should organize to handle them piece by piece and finally assemble them together to form a system to serve for the whole world.
You can have your paper published and gradually improve!
博主回复(2012-1-31 10:52)：
我个人认为：就目前的科学研究水平（理论和实验方面），人类要认识宇宙规律，解释物质是什么等问题，还需要一个漫长的过程。从实验原理技术方面来讲，我们不能直接观察氢原子中的电子和质子的运动。这些问题只有等技术进步后才可能实现，对这类问题，我们只能通过理论用人的大脑进行思想实验，然后对相关结果和推论预示的现象进行可观测的实验验证，以此来确认我们的理论是否可行。
鉴于上述的原因，我们对于宇宙和物质的认识也许是一个永无止境，没有终极解答的过程。
我坚持用经典的理想来理解物质的原子分子结构，是因为我确信这个层次的问题是由带电粒子的电磁性质决定的，采用的是因果和逻辑的科学方法对其中的规律进行研究。
我认为我提出的新理论是对氢原子结构及其光谱特征全面的分析和研究，能对已知实验结果给出合理解释，优于现有的所有模型和理论，是在正确的轨道上对科学认识的推动。
最后，我要指出科学研究是一种对科学知识的继承和发展，立脚于实验观察，而不是没有根据，漫无目的的创新，描述物质不同层次结构的理论可能有所不同，但他们是可以相互解释的，决不能是相互矛盾对立地存在，由于技术的局限性，人类的认识很可能只能认清其中的某些部分，物质结构层次的无穷大（宇宙）和无穷小（物质的起源）的认识永远只是一个追求而难于达到的目标。
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-378615-532921.html
上一篇：答网友史雄伟博士
下一篇：情人节寄语：谁与MM共荣辱
