Reviewer 1：

This paper presents a method for deriving the optimal location scheme for XXX. Overall, this is a very weak paper with the contributions being unclear. The authors state that the methods proposed in prior research efforts are not suitable for XXXX due to the lower magnitude of clamping forces in XXXX. However, it is not clear why this is so. This is especially since the authors utilize models of prior research efforts in this paper. There is no contribution in terms of developing a new XXX design model. The optimization algorithm is also not a contribution as they utilize the publicly available NSGA-II algorithm. The case study does not provide any insight as well.

大意是说：1、我的研究意义写的不清晰；2、理论有矛盾之处；3、缺乏创新性。

当时因为一些原因，文章没有给别人改，就直接投了。

确实反映出自己写作的两大不足：自己工作贡献总是不擅长表达，论文思路给别人讲的不清晰。

还是要好好改改再投，总体感觉还是自己的写作表达问题，至少不要让别人感觉，不知道做什么，有矛盾，或者自己造的词别人不理解之类的错误。

至于创新性，这个文章等表达清楚，就是仁者见仁智者见智了。