||
通过图片误用和统计规律识别文章的问题一直被学界重视
微波吸收的波动力学理论是从论证逻辑和文章结论角度识别微波吸收的阻抗匹配理论的问题. 但是对于这种级别的识别,很多学者不敢表明态度:
“some scientists wondered how a questionable line of research persisted for so long … experts were just too timid to take a stand.” Harvard calls for retraction of dozens of studies by noted cardiologist, New York Times, http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/10/16/news/harvard-calls-for-retraction-of-dozens-of-studies-by-noted-cardiologist/. 16 Oct 2018
---
“Last month, I got a private Twitter message from a postdoc bruised by the clash between
science as it is and how it should be. He had published a commentary in which
he pointed out errors in a famous researcher’s paper. The critique was accurate,
important and measured — a service to his field. But it caused him problems:
his adviser told him that publishing the criticism had crossed a line,
and he should never do it again.”
S. Vazire, A toast to the error detectors, Nature 2020 Vol. 577 Issue 7788 Pages 9
Accession Number: 31889172 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03909-2
----





Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2026-5-18 01:08
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社