Overlap and Redundancy of the 40 TRIZ Principles with 

DIKWP × DIKWP Transformations

Yucong Duan

International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)

World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)

World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)

(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)

Investigating Overlap and Redundancy of the 40 TRIZ Principles in the Context of DIKWP × DIKWP Transformations

Introduction

The DIKWP model—Data (D), Information (I), Knowledge (K), Wisdom (W), Purpose (P)—is a networked framework representing cognitive processes, where transformations can occur between any pair of elements. The 40 TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) principles are strategies aimed at solving complex problems through inventive thinking.

Previously, we mapped the 40 TRIZ principles to all possible DIKWP transformations, ensuring comprehensive coverage. Now, we are tasked with investigating the overlap or redundancy among these principles when applied to the DIKWP × DIKWP transformations. This analysis aims to:

• Identify potential overlaps or redundancies among the TRIZ principles in the context of DIKWP transformations.

• Assess the implications of any redundancies for practical application.

• Provide insights on optimizing the use of TRIZ principles within the DIKWP framework.

1. Review the Mapping:

• Re-examine the mapping of TRIZ principles to DIKWP transformations to identify where multiple principles apply to the same transformation.

2. Identify Overlaps and Redundancies:

• Determine which TRIZ principles frequently appear across multiple transformations.

• Analyze whether some principles are functionally similar or cover the same conceptual ground.

3. Categorize Principles:

• Group principles based on their functions or the types of transformations they address.

• Identify clusters of principles that may be overlapping.

4. Assess Implications:

• Evaluate how overlaps impact the application of TRIZ principles within the DIKWP model.

• Consider whether redundancies hinder or enhance problem-solving.

5. Provide Recommendations:

• Suggest ways to streamline the use of TRIZ principles in the DIKWP context.

• Propose potential consolidation of principles if appropriate.

From the previous mapping, we observed that:

• Certain TRIZ principles are applied to multiple transformations.

• Some transformations have multiple applicable principles.

For instance:

• Principle 15: Dynamics is widely applicable across many transformations.

• Principle 35: Parameter Changes appears in almost every transformation.

This widespread applicability suggests potential overlaps.

• Principle 15: Dynamics

• Applied to transformations involving adaptability and evolution.

• Appears in transformations: D ↔ P, I ↔ P, K ↔ K, W ↔ W, W ↔ P, multi-element interactions.

• Principle 35: Parameter Changes

• Involves modifying parameters to optimize systems.

• Applied across almost all transformations.

• Principle 23: Feedback

• Pertains to using feedback loops for refinement.

• Common in transformations involving learning and iterative improvement.

• Principle 25: Self-Service

• Relates to systems that function autonomously.

• Applied to D ↔ P, K ↔ P, P ↔ P transformations.

• Principle 32: Color Changes

• Involves changing perspectives or representations.

• Applied to D ↔ W, I ↔ W, K ↔ W transformations.

• Principle 1: Segmentation and Principle 2: Taking Out

• Both involve breaking down systems but may overlap in practice.

• Principle 9: Preliminary Anti-Action and Principle 10: Preliminary Action

• Both deal with preparatory steps to prevent issues, potentially overlapping in their application.

• Principle 26: Copying and Principle 40: Composite Materials

• Both involve leveraging existing solutions or combining elements, possibly overlapping in certain contexts.

To better understand overlaps, we can categorize the principles based on their functions:

• Principle 15: Dynamics

• Principle 35: Parameter Changes

• Principle 23: Feedback

• Principle 25: Self-Service

• Principle 13: The Other Way Round

• Principle 32: Color Changes

• Principle 9: Preliminary Anti-Action

• Principle 10: Preliminary Action

• Principle 1: Segmentation

• Principle 5: Merging

• Principle 26: Copying

• Principle 40: Composite Materials

By grouping principles, we can see that some principles within the same category may overlap in their application.

• Positive Aspects:

• Reinforcement of Concepts: Overlapping principles may reinforce important strategies, ensuring they are considered.

• Flexibility in Application: Multiple principles can offer different perspectives on addressing the same transformation.

• Negative Aspects:

• Redundancy: Excessive overlap may lead to confusion or inefficiency in selecting the appropriate principle.

• Dilution of Focus: Practitioners may be overwhelmed by similar principles, hindering decisive action.

• Principle 15 vs. Principle 35:

• Both deal with adaptability but at different levels.

• Principle 15 focuses on the dynamic nature of systems.

• Principle 35 emphasizes changing specific parameters.

• Principle 9 vs. Principle 10:

• Both involve preparatory actions.

• Overlap may cause redundancy in planning stages.

• Principle 26 vs. Principle 40:

• Both encourage using existing solutions.

• May overlap when considering reusing or combining elements.

• Combine Overlapping Principles:

• Consider merging principles with significant overlap for practical purposes.

• For example, treat Principle 9 and Principle 10 as a single preparatory principle.

• Create Subcategories:

• Develop sub-principles under broader categories to clarify distinctions.

• For instance, under Adaptability, define when to apply Dynamics vs. Parameter Changes.

• Develop Decision Guides:

• Create guidelines to help practitioners choose the most appropriate principle.

• Decision trees or flowcharts can aid in selecting principles based on the specific context.

• Clarify Definitions:

• Provide clear definitions and examples to distinguish between similar principles.

• Emphasize the unique aspects of each principle.

• Contextual Application:

• Encourage practitioners to consider the specific context of the transformation.

• Select principles that best fit the unique characteristics of the situation.

• Educate on Overlaps:

• Include discussions on overlaps in training materials.

• Help practitioners understand the nuances between similar principles.

• Promote Critical Thinking:

• Encourage users to critically assess which principles are most applicable.

• Emphasize that not all principles need to be applied in every situation.

The investigation reveals that there is some overlap and potential redundancy among the 40 TRIZ principles when applied to the DIKWP × DIKWP transformations. This is especially evident in principles that are broadly applicable or functionally similar.

Implications:

• Redundancies can both aid and hinder problem-solving.

• They can reinforce important strategies but may also cause confusion.

• Careful selection and application of principles are essential.

• Practitioners should be mindful of overlaps and choose principles that best fit the context.

Recommendations:

• Streamline the use of principles by combining or clarifying overlapping ones.

• Provide guidance to practitioners on selecting appropriate principles.

• Emphasize understanding the unique contributions of each principle.

By addressing overlaps and redundancies, we can enhance the effectiveness of the TRIZ principles within the DIKWP framework, promoting more efficient and innovative problem-solving.

Final Thoughts

The 40 TRIZ principles offer a comprehensive toolkit for inventive problem-solving. While overlaps exist, they reflect the interconnected nature of creative strategies. By acknowledging and managing these overlaps, we can optimize the application of TRIZ principles to the DIKWP transformations, ultimately enhancing cognitive processes and innovation in both human and artificial intelligence systems.