前几日收到论文小修通知，要求根据审稿意见进行修改。其中有一条是针对论文中的文献综述的部分的。

下面一句话是我论文中的句子：

“The experimental results indicated that the proposed method consisting of GEMD and EED is superior to the original Hilbert-Huang Transform at least in restrainingthe boundary effect”

审稿人提的意见是这样的：

“Hilbert-Huang Transform is not equal to EMD, and the boundary effect is produced by EMD but not Hilbert transform, EMD is a decomposing method while Hilbert transform is a demodulating method, so that it is improper to use HHT here.”

其中,GEMD (generalized empirical mode decomposition), EED (empirical envelope demodulation), HHT(Hilbert-Huang Transform)

我论文中索引的论文为“Generalized empirical mode decomposition and its applications to rolling element bearing fault diagnosis”中摘要的最后一句话“The analysis results indicate that the proposed method consisting of GEMD and EED is superior to the original HHT at least in restraining the boundary effect”

从审稿人的意见可以看出，他是质疑将HHT方法进行对比，我引用的基本可以说没有改变原作者的论文中的语义，但是审稿人的质疑应该怎么回答呢？

希望有经验的读者能够帮我解答一下，不胜感激~