|
【博主跋】莱特报告新近推出英语世界二战后最重要的科学哲学家排行榜,基本靠谱! 1. Rudolf Carnap (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)【卡尔纳普,国内有《世界的逻辑构造》译本】 |
2. Thomas S. Kuhn loses to Rudolf Carnap by 92–89【库恩,国内有《科学革命》、《必要的张力》等译本,他的观点国内比较熟】 |
3. Carl G. Hempel loses to Rudolf Carnap by 106–64, loses to Thomas S. Kuhn by 99–74【亨普尔,记得有一个译本,名忘了】 |
4. Karl Popper loses to Rudolf Carnap by 99–64, loses to Carl G. Hempel by 94–73【波普尔,是国内比较熟悉的科学哲学家】 |
5. Bas van Fraassen loses to Rudolf Carnap by 111–69, loses to Karl Popper by 89–78【范佛拉森,记得有《科学的形象》译本】 |
6. W.V.O. Quine loses to Rudolf Carnap by 115–50, loses to Bas van Fraassen by 99–71【奎因,《从逻辑的观点看》等译本】 |
7. Hans Reichenbach loses to Rudolf Carnap by 124–35, loses to W.V.O. Quine by 81–67【赖兴巴赫。记得《科学哲学起源》一书】 |
8. Nancy Cartwright loses to Rudolf Carnap by 127–40, loses to Hans Reichenbach by 78–72 |
9. Paul Feyerabend loses to Rudolf Carnap by 123–50, loses to Nancy Cartwright by 83–74【费耶阿本德,《反对方法》等译本】 |
10. Ian Hacking loses to Rudolf Carnap by 123–45, loses to Paul Feyerabend by 78–74【哈金,好像有一本,书名忘了】 |
11. Imre Lakatos loses to Rudolf Carnap by 130–39, loses to Ian Hacking by 76–71【拉卡托斯,有《科学研究纲领方法论》等】 |
12. Hilary Putnam loses to Rudolf Carnap by 122–41, loses to Imre Lakatos by 75–71【普特南,《理性、真理与历史》等】 |
13. Philip Kitcher loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–35, loses to Hilary Putnam by 85–63【基奇,看过一本,忘了名字】 |
14. Wesley Salmon loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–24, loses to Philip Kitcher by 70–62【萨蒙,好像有一个译本,名忘了】 |
15. Ernest Nagel loses to Rudolf Carnap by 135–31, loses to Wesley Salmon by 61–58【内格尔,这也是大牛,也有译本】 |
16. Elliott Sober loses to Rudolf Carnap by 136–29, loses to Ernest Nagel by 66–55 |
17. John Earman loses to Rudolf Carnap by 129–30, loses to Elliott Sober by 62–60 |
18. Nelson Goodman loses to Rudolf Carnap by 138–28, loses to John Earman by 67–65【记得刘华杰教授翻译过他的一本著作】 |
19. Patrick Suppes loses to Rudolf Carnap by 133–20, loses to Nelson Goodman by 72–54【苏佩斯,好像有一个译本】 |
20. Larry Laudan loses to Rudolf Carnap by 134–21, loses to Patrick Suppes by 58–56【劳丹,《进步及其问题》,马雷教授是专家】 2016-3-10于南方临屏涂鸦 说明:文中图片来自网络,没有任何商业目的,仅供欣赏,特此致谢! |
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-5 05:54
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社