1. Saul Kripke  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)，克里普克的书记得看过一本《命名与必然性》；

2. W.V.O. Quine  loses to Saul Kripke by 141–74，奎因的书看过较多，《从逻辑的观点看》提出了两个教条之说；

3. H. Paul Grice  loses to Saul Kripke by 161–51, loses to W.V.O. Quine by 114–88

4. J.L. Austin  loses to Saul Kripke by 159–62, loses to H. Paul Grice by 104–91，奥斯汀的说不多，记得看过一本；

5. Donald Davidson  loses to Saul Kripke by 168–50, loses to J.L. Austin by 104–101，戴维森的书看过一本；

6. David K. Lewis  loses to Saul Kripke by 160–42, loses to Donald Davidson by 104–90，刘易斯的书好像没有看过；

7. Noam Chomsky  loses to Saul Kripke by 154–60, loses to David K. Lewis by 96–92，乔姆斯基的书看过两本；

8. Hilary Putnam  loses to Saul Kripke by 174–41, loses to Noam Chomsky by 100–92，普特南的书看过很多，国内几乎都有译本；

9. Rudolf Carnap  loses to Saul Kripke by 162–47, loses to Hilary Putnam by 100–86，卡尔纳普的书看过一本《世界的逻辑构造》；

10. David Kaplan  loses to Saul Kripke by 176–23, loses to Rudolf Carnap by 88–83，卡普兰的书没有看过；

11. Michael Dummett  loses to Saul Kripke by 175–41, loses to David Kaplan by 89–82，达米特的书记得看过两本；

12. P.F. (Peter) Strawson  loses to Saul Kripke by 179–37, loses to Michael Dummett by 96–77，

13. Alfred Tarski  loses to Saul Kripke by 180–21, loses to P.F. (Peter) Strawson by 90–71，塔尔斯基的文章看过几篇

14. Tied:
Gareth Evans  loses to Saul Kripke by 189–23, loses to Alfred Tarski by 80–75，埃文斯的书看过半本（《指称的多样性》没看完）
Robert Stalnaker  loses to Saul Kripke by 183–16, loses to Alfred Tarski by 80–68

16. John Searle  loses to Saul Kripke by 193–17, loses to Gareth Evans by 87–76，塞尔的书几乎都看过，“中文屋”很有趣；

17. Tyler Burge  loses to Saul Kripke by 192–12, loses to John Searle by 81–65

18. Keith Donnellan  loses to Saul Kripke by 192–10, loses to Tyler Burge by 68–57

19. Peter Geach  loses to Saul Kripke by 192–10, loses to Keith Donnellan by 62–57

20. Robert Brandom  loses to Saul Kripke by 178–32, loses to Peter Geach by 76–62