||
哲学的历史源远流长,它是一切现代科学的真正精神故乡。现代意义上的哲学是西方产品,包括我们信奉的作为国家信仰的马克思的理论也是西方产品,它只不过是众多理论流派中的一种,并不先天具有排他性的垄断特权。我们应该把视野放开,从众多哲学理论中选取最有价值的部分,而不是预先设定专卖店模式的思想特供。在西方哲学近代的发展中涌现出一批有影响的哲学学术期刊,最近莱特教授就组织了一次问卷调查,根据读者投票数,得出一些世界顶级哲学杂志的排名,见下表:
With almost 550 votes in our earlier poll, here are the results:
1. Philosophical Review (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) |
2. Journal of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 244–117 |
3. Nous loses to Philosophical Review by 245–130, loses to Journal of Philosophy by 195–178 |
4. Mind loses to Philosophical Review by 260–114, loses to Nous by 185–179 |
5. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research loses to Philosophical Review by 284–97, loses to Mind by 236–143 |
6. Ethics loses to Philosophical Review by 279–85, loses to Philosophy & Phenomenological Research by 205–154 |
7. Philosophical Studies loses to Philosophical Review by 312–60, loses to Ethics by 215–133 |
8. Australasian Journal of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 317–70, loses to Philosophical Studies by 175–162 |
9. Philosopher's Imprint loses to Philosophical Review by 319–57, loses to Australasian Journal of Philosophy by 191–140 |
10. Analysis loses to Philosophical Review by 325–65, loses to Philosopher's Imprint by 184–166 |
11. Philosophical Quarterly loses to Philosophical Review by 331–48, loses to Analysis by 193–158 |
12. Philosophy & Public Affairs loses to Philosophical Review by 303–51, loses to Philosophical Quarterly by 166–149 |
13. Philosophy of Science loses to Philosophical Review by 303–50, loses to Philosophy & Public Affairs by 162–110 |
14. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science loses to Philosophical Review by 299–57, loses to Philosophy of Science by 138–112 |
15. Synthese loses to Philosophical Review by 328–51, loses to British Journal for the Philosophy of Science by 155–131 |
16. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society loses to Philosophical Review by 333–31, loses to Synthese by 152–147 |
17. Erkenntnis loses to Philosophical Review by 319–51, loses to Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society by 152–141 |
18. American Philosophical Quarterly loses to Philosophical Review by 341–33, loses to Erkenntnis by 148–145 |
19. Canadian Journal of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 333–33, loses to American Philosophical Quarterly by 154–120 |
20. Journal of the History of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 295–42, loses to Canadian Journal of Philosophy by 135–123 |
21. Journal of Philosophical Logic loses to Philosophical Review by 304–26, loses to Journal of the History of Philosophy by 119–100 |
22. Mind & Language loses to Philosophical Review by 312–30, loses to Journal of Philosophical Logic by 117–91 |
23. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly loses to Philosophical Review by 337–17, loses to Mind & Language by 123–118 |
24. European Journal of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 319–38, loses to Pacific Philosophical Quarterly by 148–113 |
25. British Journal for the History of Philosophy loses to Philosophical Review by 303–37, loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 120–112 |
目前国内哲学学科属于CSSCI类的哲学刊物主要有如下几家:
序号 |
期刊名称 |
主办(管)单位 |
1 |
哲学研究 |
中国社会科学院哲学研究所 |
2 |
哲学动态 |
中国社会科学院哲学研究所 |
3 |
自然辩证法研究 |
中国自然辩证法研究会 |
4 |
道德与文明 |
中国伦理学会、天津社会科学院 |
5 |
世界哲学 |
中国社会科学院哲学研究所 |
6 |
伦理学研究 |
湖南师范大学 |
7 |
自然辩证法通讯 |
中国科学院研究生院 |
8 |
现代哲学 |
广东省社会科学界联合会 |
9 |
科学技术哲学研究 |
山西大学、山西省自然辩证法研究会 |
10 |
系统科学学报 |
太原理工大学 |
11 |
孔子研究 |
中国孔子基金会 |
12 |
中国哲学史 |
中国哲学史学会 |
【博主跋】由于语言的障碍,国内学者能够发表在英文哲学期刊的文章并不是很多,相信随着新一代留学生的大量涌现,这块很快会繁荣起来。另外,值得担忧的是作为一门思想学科,一旦评价标准完全向国外杂志靠拢,哲学的末日也就快了。何出此言:因为如此一来哲学的影响力会迅速缩减(原本声誉已经毁坏的差不多了),受众寥寥,最后无人问津,毕竟能看到并能读懂英文哲学论文的人不是很多。哲学作为一门影响思想的学科,它的主要职能是改变当下所在地社会人们的思维与行动模式,肩负启蒙之使命,从这个意义上讲,中国哲学工作者的主要使命是通过研究与思考,积极参与到社会的进步与转型之中,而不仅仅回到书斋中的经院哲学模式。让其自然发展比胡乱管理要好得多!
说明:文中图片来自网络,没有任何商业目的,仅供欣赏,特此致谢!
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-22 23:48
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社