博文
修改稿能否增加作者
|
移动端授权发布的微信号：LetPub、科学网，浙大学报英文版(微信号:zdxbywb)，募格学术(微信号: mugexueshu), “派博学术”(pdoctor67), 山东大学学报，其他微信号，请询问博主。
最近频繁收到我们期刊管理编辑的邮件，询问我受理的稿件的作者要求增加新作者事宜。
和其他期刊差不多，几乎所有期刊不允许作者在投递修改稿的时候变动作者，对这个问题可能一些作者理解有偏误，认为期刊过于死板。
实际上不少作者投稿的时候对作者组署名很随意，稿件修改的时候随意变动作者顺序，增加新作者，删除原来的作者，甚至稿件录用了还要求变动通讯作者，增加新作者，这些行为都是违法科学规定和期刊政策的。下面说说什么情况下可以申请变动作者。
1）稿件在审回后学术编辑给出了Major revision，如果的确稿件需要补充的内容原来的作者不能完成，需要其他人做出补充实验，比如数值计算和理论证明等，这种情况下是可以申请增加新作者的，但必须在修改答复中告诉编辑和审稿人，这个新增加的作者做出了哪些贡献，并同时附上其他作者同意增加该作者的说明，比如所有作者同意增加新作者的签名和声明。
2）新增加的作者顺序问题。原则上新增加的作者的顺序只能依次往后，不能放在原来作者的署名顺序前面。
3）Minor revision下一般不要增加新作者，可以在稿件最后致谢即可。
4）稿件一旦录用不能增加和变更作者顺序，但可以申请变更和增加作者单位。
严谨的署名是科学工作者的必修课。
----------------以下是我给某国外作者的一封邮件，告诉作者如何增加作者-----------
Dear Huseyin Merdan:
I got your message that you want to add a new author in the author list of your revised version.
As you know, authors in the paper should give distinct contribution to the idea, numerical and experimental results, and data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.
You should clarify the distinct contribution for the new coauthor and should be agreed from all the previous coauthors.
Maybe, you can give thanks to the "new coauthor" in the end of the conclusion by acknowlegement if possible.
On the other hand, if the "new coauthor " did great and distict contribution to the new version after major revision, you can add him as the last coauthor , and the previou author list are not allowed to make any change. Your previous version has two authors, maybe, if necessary, you can add him as the third author.
As a result, minor revision can't allow you add any new author in the revised version.
In fact, I ever gave many academic help and suggestion and even code writing and tests to some researchers , they ever tried to add me as coauthors but I declined all them because I thought my contribution is insufficient.
In the last year, our NODY found that some authors used to change the author list, and even remove the previous authors by adding new authors in the revised version. This behavior is absurd and not allowed.
Thanks for your contribution.
Yours, Jun Ma
-----------第二个稿件的作者也有类似的诉求，答复如下------------
Dear Marius-F. Danca:
Thanks for your contribution and question.
Each author of the manuscript should be regonized with distinct contribution.
It could be difficut for you to calculate the Hamiton energy for this system together with following discussion, it could be acceptable to add new coathor with distinct contribution.
Your coauthor, Pro. Chen Guanrong, is a excellent but rigorous expert, as you claimed, the other authors agreed to add the new coauthor Michal Feckan in the revised version.
You can claim his/her contribution in the revision note or cover letter.
Surely, Michal Feckan can be list behind the previous authors, that is to say, the order of author list can't be changed, the new coauthor could be the fourth one in the author list if possible.
In fact, our NODY decline to any changes of author list without any statement.
Thank you.
Best regards.
Yours, Jun
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-60980-1013644.html
上一篇：导师拖拉稿件修改咋办
下一篇：爱恨交加的中国期刊，分区惹得错吗？
