|||
Did you have seizure while writing this sentence? Because I fell like I had one while reading it.
审稿人:亲,你写文章的时候难道犯癫痫症了吗?反正老子觉得读这篇论文的时候,肯定犯了癫痫症。
作者:这是不是简直让人怀疑人生呀!
Theresults are as weak as wet noodles.
审稿人:结果像面条一样,软弱无力。
作者:(ˉ▽ ̄~) 切~~ 切~~ 切~~
Itis a bit for me that authors have used Python statistical analysis instead of SPSS or Matlab as usual. Please, explain.
审稿人:本文用了Python,而不是像其他作者那样用SPSS和Matlab处理数据。亲,为啥呢?能不能给我说下缘由呢?
作者:这是什么鬼操作?
I started reading this manuscript with much anticipation. But my enthusiasm was short lived.
审稿人:老子满怀期待的读这篇文章,但很无奈,热情很短暂,还不如流星的寿命长。
作者:哎,不说了,老子啥也不想干了,赶紧回家躲被窝,睡下觉,好好在梦里反省去,看看周公能不能给老子解下梦……
The English language ranks this manuscript among the top 5 worst manuscripts I have ever reviewed.
审稿人:这篇文章的英语水平可以排进老子看过的最烂的前五了。
作者:心哗哗的流血,老子准备跑到学校最高楼直接跳下去……无言的人生……
I have rarely a more blown-up and annoy paper in the last couple of years than this hot-air ballo on manuscript.
审稿人:老子过去几年都没读过这篇像屁一样烦人的鸟文章。
作者:娘希匹,太伤自尊心了。赶紧找个墙角,寻块砖,砸下自己那个自认为还聪明无比的小脑袋瓜子,免得老子被气死了……
But now, there are over 1000 articles on this topic. But this author have not read a single.
审稿人:这个方向至少有一千篇文章,作者怎么都没读过一篇?
作者:真的?假的?ε=(ο`*)))唉,心碎了一地……窗外的夜,无言的黑……
This paper makes no contribution.
审稿人:这文章有个毛锤子的贡献。
作者:干脆,老子也直接拿个锤子,把电脑分分钟钟给砸了,还写个毛的论文。
Reject-More holes than my grandads’ string vest.
审稿人:这是什么破玩意?直接拒了,这篇论文的漏洞比老子爷爷的背心上的网眼还多一沓。
作者:啊,真的数过吗?脑瓜子欠抽,补营养中……
This paper is desperate. Please reject it complete and then block The author's email ID so they can't use the online system future.
审稿人:这一篇文章简直太差了,无法用言语形容其烂的水平,赶紧封掉作者的账号,免得他们以后还再来投这些破玩意儿。不然,你们还得过来烦老子,影响老子的心情。
作者:他奶奶的熊,我跟你有仇?至于这样吗?感觉人格受到歧视。
The biggest problem with manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.
审稿人:这篇稿子简直没有再糟糕的了。审得老子都有一点不想活了,赶紧准备去自挂东南枝了。
作者:阿弥陀佛?!老子也想准备去自挂东南枝了,准备挑一个最高的枝条!
Done! Difficult task, I don’t wish to think about constipation and faecal floraduring my holidays! But, once a referee, always and anywhere a referee; we are good boy scouts in the research wilderness. Even under the sun and near awonderful beach.
审稿人:终于搞定了!太不容易了。老子才不想装着一脑子便秘还有粪便菌落来这儿度假呢。但是呢,一朝做了审稿人,永远都是审稿人,走到哪儿都是审稿人。在科学研究的荒漠中,我们是勇敢的童子军,即使在洒满阳光的沙滩上也是。
作者:哼!你说是不是呢?亲,需要动手点下赞吗??
The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.
审稿人:就算回到本科时期,老子也会分分钟钟拒掉这种其烂无比的破文章。
作者:俺辛辛苦苦写的,水平真这么差劲?感觉智商受到侮辱了。
This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of datagathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion.
审稿人:这篇论文写得太烂了,一无是处。目的不明确,结论不合理,引文还都是瞎胡乱引的,而且跟正文的论证都完全对不上号。老子十二分怀疑这样的实验方法,也120%怀疑他们收集的数据是不是正常得来的,反正一句话,都不足以得出有效、可靠的结论。
作者:难道老子写论文的时候,脑袋里装的都是浆糊?!这可咋办呢?!
The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go homeearly and then spend time to wonder what life is about.
审稿人:写作水平和数据展示太糟糕了,让老子整个人都感觉到仿佛世界末日来临了。所以呢,老子不得不提前下班,早点回家,然后,花点时间,思考一下,到底什么才是美丽的人生时光,而不是这种无聊透顶的枯燥生活。
作者:天呀,谁来拯救回这篇让审稿人失望透顶的论文?!老子肯定到时候递上宝贵的膝盖!!!!
注:本文源于网络,版权归原作者和(或)出版商,仅用于学术传播等非商业行为。特在此致谢!
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-22 23:54
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社