王汉森的博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/王汉森 Welcome to my blog!

博文

《柳叶刀》:戒烟之于拯救生命功效非凡

已有 4428 次阅读 2012-10-28 11:36 |个人分类:学术园地|系统分类:论文交流

   《柳叶刀》10月27日发表英国一项对130万抽烟妇女调查研究显示,40岁以前戒烟可以避免90%以上的由继续抽烟导致的额外死亡。请点击下面的链接查看该研究论文摘要。如果您是《柳叶刀》注册用户,可以登入获得免费全文。

 

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)61720-6/abstract

 

The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: a prospective study of one million women in the UK

Kirstin Pirie MSc a Corresponding AuthorEmail Address, Prof Richard Peto FRS b, Gillian K Reeves PhD a, Jane Green DPhil a, Prof Valerie Beral FRS a, for the Million Women Study Collaborators
 
Summary
 
Background
Women born around 1940 in countries such as the UK and USA were the first generation in which many smoked substantial numbers of cigarettes throughout adult life. Hence, only in the 21st century can we observe directly the full effects of prolonged smoking, and of prolonged cessation, on mortality among women in the UK.
 
Methods
For this prospective study, 1·3 million UK women were recruited in 1996—2001 and resurveyed postally about 3 and 8 years later. All were followed to Jan 1, 2011, through national mortality records (mean 12 woman-years, SD 2). Participants were asked at entry whether they were current or ex-smokers, and how many cigarettes they currently smoked. Those who were ex-smokers at both entry and the 3-year resurvey and had stopped before the age of 55 years were categorised by the age they had stopped smoking. We used Cox regression models to obtain adjusted relative risks that compared categories of smokers or ex-smokers with otherwise similar never-smokers.
 
Findings
After excluding 0·1 million women with previous disease, 1·2 million women remained, with median birth year 1943 (IQR 1938—46) and age 55 years (IQR 52—60). Overall, 6% (66 489/1 180 652) died, at mean age 65 years (SD 6). At baseline, 20% (232 461) were current smokers, 28% (328 417) were ex-smokers, and 52% (619 774) were never-smokers. For 12-year mortality, those smoking at baseline had a mortality rate ratio of 2·76 (95% CI 2·71—2·81) compared with never-smokers, even though 44% (37 240/85 256) of the baseline smokers who responded to the 8-year resurvey had by then stopped smoking. Mortality was tripled, largely irrespective of age, in those still smoking at the 3-year resurvey (rate ratio 2·97, 2·88—3·07). Even for women smoking fewer than ten cigarettes per day at baseline, 12-year mortality was doubled (rate ratio 1·98, 1·91—2·04). Of the 30 most common causes of death, 23 were increased significantly in smokers; for lung cancer, the rate ratio was 21·4 (19·7—23·2). The excess mortality among smokers (in comparison with never-smokers) was mainly from diseases that, like lung cancer, can be caused by smoking. Among ex-smokers who had stopped permanently at ages 25—34 years or at ages 35—44 years, the respective relative risks were 1·05 (95% CI 1·00—1·11) and 1·20 (1·14—1·26) for all-cause mortality and 1·84 (1·45—2·34) and 3·34 (2·76—4·03) for lung cancer mortality. Thus, although some excess mortality remains among these long-term ex-smokers, it is only 3% and 10% of the excess mortality among continuing smokers. If combined with 2010 UK national death rates, tripled mortality rates among smokers indicate 53% of smokers and 22% of never-smokers dying before age 80 years, and an 11-year lifespan difference.
 
Interpretation
Among UK women, two-thirds of all deaths of smokers in their 50s, 60s, and 70s are caused by smoking; smokers lose at least 10 years of lifespan. Although the hazards of smoking until age 40 years and then stopping are substantial, the hazards of continuing are ten times greater. Stopping before age 40 years (and preferably well before age 40 years) avoids more than 90% of the excess mortality caused by continuing smoking; stopping before age 30 years avoids more than 97% of it.
 
Funding
Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.


https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-5414-626906.html

上一篇:英国剑桥分子生物学实验室成功的启示
下一篇:《柳叶刀》:“植物人”或许存留部分意识和认知功能
收藏 IP: 69.158.30.*| 热度|

3 许培扬 吕洪波 杨正瓴

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (1 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-27 05:05

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部