Owning to the nature of thissubject and the fact that I am not concentrating on it, it is bound to be looselyconstructed. Nevertheless, I am trying to cover major aspects of theaggressiveness other than male-style violence.

Intra-sex competition,though exists in different ways, is universal; for all reported intra-sexviolences among the other sex, the primary male concern, evolutionarily, is onparent-offspring aggressive conflict, which is sometimes lethal, hence imposinga direct reproductive consequences from the point of view of males.

If the sex that take chargeof most infant care is bad-tempered, easy to be iritated to a searing point,then, at some period of newborn development, it is dangerous. There are loadsof cases the infant being murdered, no need to scour the web for instances,obviously.

This is why angry isuniversally thought to be a male mental character. Even if she—not he—is in aleading or top position, fuming or barking at top of her voice is notconsidered the proper display for an other-than-male boss.

It is none the business of –ISTor –ISM, it is a matter of biology, human biology, since human being is simplya living being, its gender role reflects its reprodution role, which demandsremarkably different psychological phenotype, whose driving force is magicallysimple: hormones, or ultimately, genes—in rare cases the body may beinsensitive to hormones.

If somebody whose gender isother than male complains, or sort of boasts, over something ofself-consciousness with a point of being-excellent-except-quick-tempered, itmight sounds confusing since the Role just mentioned is not taken into account.No wonder, if the opposite sex behaves himself just like that, he is quite anice guy-- much desired quality, sexually attractive to the opposite sex. Socialmedia and dating website stats have repeatedly demonstrated that male avatarwith a cheerful face, which means that its bodily individual has a good temper,is not always preferred; the contrary is true.