博文
这篇Transactions救活了
|
四个月前，我发过一篇博文——
该怎样拯救你,我的第一篇Transactions,求高手指点
今天此事终于有了结果
| Additional Questions | Reviewer1 | Reviewer2 | Reviewer3 |
| Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field? | Yes | Moderately So | Yes |
| Is the paper technically sound? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced? | Important Information is missing or superficially treated. | Yes | Yes |
| How would you describe technical depth of paper? | Suitable for the non-specialist | Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field | Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field |
| How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper? | Somewhat Novel | Somewhat Novel | Somewhat Novel |
| How would you rate the overall organization of the paper? | Could be improved | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
| How do you rate the English usage? | Needs improvement | Needs improvement | Satisfactory |
| Rate the Bibliography | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
| How would you rate the technical contents of the paper? | Good | Good | Excellent |
| How would you rate the novelty of the paper? | Sufficiently Novel | Sufficiently Novel | Sufficiently Novel |
| How would you rate the "literary" presentation of the paper? | Mostly Accessible | Partially Accessible | Mostly Accessible |
| How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this IEEE Transactions? | Good Match | Good Match | Good Match |
| Recommendation? | AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes | AQ - Publish In AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes | Publish Unaltered |
向关心我的人，关注过此事的人致谢，特别是中国地质大学的刘庆生老师，您的指点对我弥足珍贵！
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-48882-710237.html
上一篇："坑师"的腾讯
下一篇：当我觉得....
