||
一、中国学生科技论文的一些不足:
综述部分相对较好,但是对实验数据的分析不足,对仿真的完成相对简单,方法不够明确。结论不够清晰,缺乏对未来研究方向的指明。Chinese students usually have good review part of the paper, but lack of data analysis. Simulations are too simple, unclear conclusions and lack of future research direction.
二、科技论文的写作建议:
Quoting other work is an established and proper practice in scientific research, but there is a fine line between quoting other work and uncritically quoting flawed assumptions invented by others.
The significance of the work must be clearly explained in the introduction, where the question: why is this piece of work done and why should the readers (other experts in the field) should read and learn it.作为编辑和审稿人指出的黄金经验。
All the conclusions must be clearly explained and fully supported by results.
If all the results can be explained based on current understanding and easily predictable, the work is probably not very significant.对创新点的界定。
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-10-20 03:01
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社