博文
欢迎卢伯恩斯顿教授成为新的“方学家”
|||
寻正
所以指控方舟子造假剽窃行为的人，都会在第一时间内被方舟子及其粉丝打成“方学家”，所有的指控变成谣言，指控者变成了被方舟子打假而怀恨报复的人。美国密西根州立大学生理学教授Robert Root-Bernstein（罗伯特*卢-伯恩斯顿）博士指责方舟子剽窃其作品，要求方舟子道歉，起初方舟子表现出了克制，还假心假意地道歉，试图蒙混过关，但遭到了卢-伯恩斯顿教授的拒绝。
方舟子于2011年8月12日向卢伯恩斯顿教授发信，要求不再参加卢伯恩斯顿教授的讨方论坛（事实上方舟子也不参加讨论，包括他的支持者在内都习惯于私下交流，试图跟卢伯恩斯顿私了）。由于种种原因，卢伯恩斯顿教授没有及时回复他的信，方舟子误以为卢伯恩斯顿教授已经放他一马，不再追究，于是乎方舟子得意洋洋把他的狡辩信示之于众，为自己开托。然而，很快，卢伯恩斯顿教授再次重拳出击，狠批方舟子的无耻，嘲笑其支持者的脸厚，还通过《深圳商报》，表示可以考虑起诉方舟子。
方舟子陷入了有生以来的最大屈辱状态，先前的克制融化消失，方舟子最新博文以强硬姿态恢复了自己的惯常策略，把指责变成谣言，把指控者变成方学家，变成被自己打假的对象。咱们静待方舟子打美国教授的假？
我将方舟子的雄论反馈给讨方论坛，并同时庆贺卢伯恩斯顿教授加入我们方学家行列。关注你一下就变成方学家，自狂自恋成东方不败了。
【卢伯恩斯顿针对方舟子的无耻策略就一句公开评语：Well, if I had any doubts about his underhandedness prior to this, I certainly don't now. 好吧，如果说我此前对他的阴险狡诈还存有疑问的话，现在显然没有了。（卢伯恩斯顿针对刘实信的公开回复）】
Dear All,
As always, Dr. Fang does not face anyone who accuses him of wrongdoings directly, but he sends his response to the public in ways to seriously distort the fact to his best advantage. Because Dr. Root-Bernstein is a professor in MSU in U.S., he is probably the only person who had accused of Dr. Fang of wrongdoings and had been responded to with restraint. All others have had been labeled as frauds and accusations as libel and slander the minute they have made their charges. Unfortunately, this level of restraint is melting away. Dr. Fang has sent his "FINAL" response to Chinese public about this matter. Here's my translation of Dr. Fang's latest response. If I'm not 100% accurate, Dr. Fang and his "neutral" supporters, please feel free to correct me.
======message from Dr. Fang's blog===========
Dr. Root-Bernstein slandered me by saying that I received salary from the New Threads to post online essays, 90 percent of my article was content of his article, I had literally copied his text and examples (in fact, I had rewritten it appropriately with my own examples), and I had plagiarized and infringed the copyright of his article. All of these are rumors. He had authorized "Fang Specialists" to slander me. I have been kind enough not to launch legal actions against him, he dares to threaten me for legal actions? This is my final statement on the issue, from now on, anyone asking about this issue will be on my blacklist. (Root-
方舟子被指抄袭
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-460310-478470.html
上一篇：卢伯恩斯顿教授再次确认其指控的真实性
下一篇：方舟子的粉丝总是帮倒忙
所以指控方舟子造假剽窃行为的人，都会在第一时间内被方舟子及其粉丝打成“方学家”，所有的指控变成谣言，指控者变成了被方舟子打假而怀恨报复的人。美国密西根州立大学生理学教授Robert Root-Bernstein（罗伯特*卢-伯恩斯顿）博士指责方舟子剽窃其作品，要求方舟子道歉，起初方舟子表现出了克制，还假心假意地道歉，试图蒙混过关，但遭到了卢-伯恩斯顿教授的拒绝。
方舟子于2011年8月12日向卢伯恩斯顿教授发信，要求不再参加卢伯恩斯顿教授的讨方论坛（事实上方舟子也不参加讨论，包括他的支持者在内都习惯于私下交流，试图跟卢伯恩斯顿私了）。由于种种原因，卢伯恩斯顿教授没有及时回复他的信，方舟子误以为卢伯恩斯顿教授已经放他一马，不再追究，于是乎方舟子得意洋洋把他的狡辩信示之于众，为自己开托。然而，很快，卢伯恩斯顿教授再次重拳出击，狠批方舟子的无耻，嘲笑其支持者的脸厚，还通过《深圳商报》，表示可以考虑起诉方舟子。
方舟子陷入了有生以来的最大屈辱状态，先前的克制融化消失，方舟子最新博文以强硬姿态恢复了自己的惯常策略，把指责变成谣言，把指控者变成方学家，变成被自己打假的对象。咱们静待方舟子打美国教授的假？
我将方舟子的雄论反馈给讨方论坛，并同时庆贺卢伯恩斯顿教授加入我们方学家行列。关注你一下就变成方学家，自狂自恋成东方不败了。
【卢伯恩斯顿针对方舟子的无耻策略就一句公开评语：Well, if I had any doubts about his underhandedness prior to this, I certainly don't now. 好吧，如果说我此前对他的阴险狡诈还存有疑问的话，现在显然没有了。（卢伯恩斯顿针对刘实信的公开回复）】
Dear All,
As always, Dr. Fang does not face anyone who accuses him of wrongdoings directly, but he sends his response to the public in ways to seriously distort the fact to his best advantage. Because Dr. Root-Bernstein is a professor in MSU in U.S., he is probably the only person who had accused of Dr. Fang of wrongdoings and had been responded to with restraint. All others have had been labeled as frauds and accusations as libel and slander the minute they have made their charges. Unfortunately, this level of restraint is melting away. Dr. Fang has sent his "FINAL" response to Chinese public about this matter. Here's my translation of Dr. Fang's latest response. If I'm not 100% accurate, Dr. Fang and his "neutral" supporters, please feel free to correct me.
======message from Dr. Fang's blog===========
Dr. Root-Bernstein slandered me by saying that I received salary from the New Threads to post online essays, 90 percent of my article was content of his article, I had literally copied his text and examples (in fact, I had rewritten it appropriately with my own examples), and I had plagiarized and infringed the copyright of his article. All of these are rumors. He had authorized "Fang Specialists" to slander me. I have been kind enough not to launch legal actions against him, he dares to threaten me for legal actions? This is my final statement on the issue, from now on, anyone asking about this issue will be on my blacklist. (Root-
Bernstein博士污蔑我从新语丝拿工资发博文、我的文章90%是其论文内容、我逐字照抄其文字和例子（其实我已做恰当的改写并举自己的例
子）、我剽窃其论文和侵犯其版权，全是谣言，他授权“方学家”诋毁我，我不起诉他已算客气，他还敢扬言告我？这是我对该事件最后表态，以后有人再问一概拉
黑。
)
======end of message=====================
The "final" status has yet to stand the test of time (my best guess is that there will be more "final" responses coming depending on circumstances), but I know that by insisting on justice and appropriate actions from a plagiarizer, Root-Bernstein officially becomes Dr. Fang's "political" enemy and possibly one of "Fang Specialists" who spread bad words about Dr. Fang because Dr. Fang had courageously exposed them. I congratulate Dr. Root-Bernstein on this, because from now on, you get a whole army of proof-readers for anything you wrote or will write, for free.
Best Regards,
Junlin Liao, Ph.D.
P.S. It would be misleading if you think you can avoid professional editing services because of the free "fraud-busting" proof-reading services. Quality does not come free, so says the Chinese saying. Dr. Fang offered his services twice to me, only proving the ignorance of himself and his gangs.
======end of message=====================
The "final" status has yet to stand the test of time (my best guess is that there will be more "final" responses coming depending on circumstances), but I know that by insisting on justice and appropriate actions from a plagiarizer, Root-Bernstein officially becomes Dr. Fang's "political" enemy and possibly one of "Fang Specialists" who spread bad words about Dr. Fang because Dr. Fang had courageously exposed them. I congratulate Dr. Root-Bernstein on this, because from now on, you get a whole army of proof-readers for anything you wrote or will write, for free.
Best Regards,
Junlin Liao, Ph.D.
P.S. It would be misleading if you think you can avoid professional editing services because of the free "fraud-busting" proof-reading services. Quality does not come free, so says the Chinese saying. Dr. Fang offered his services twice to me, only proving the ignorance of himself and his gangs.
方舟子被指抄袭
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-460310-478470.html
上一篇：卢伯恩斯顿教授再次确认其指控的真实性
下一篇：方舟子的粉丝总是帮倒忙
扫一扫，分享此博文
全部作者的精选博文
- • 绪论——功夫在文字以外
- • 如何写英文提介信（Cover Letter）
- • 何时用英文写作
- • 如何写好英文摘要（2）
- • 写作的双焦镜
- • 学术论文写作
全部作者的其他最新博文
全部精选博文导读
相关博文
- • 聚英才 建高地 | 北京理工大学“特立青年学者”全球招聘开启
- • 700年后日本或濒临灭绝？日本学者推算预测：届时或仅剩1名15岁以下孩子
- • [转载]【同位素视角】非英语母语学者如何区分’e.g.’, ‘i.e.’, ‘namely’与‘such as’等混淆难题
- • 美国佐治亚大学等机构学者：刈割策略对Bulldog 805紫花苜蓿+Tifton 85狗牙根混播草地产量及品质的影响
- • 美国堪萨斯州立大学、密苏里大学等机构学者研究成果：土壤水分管理策略和品种多样性对紫花苜蓿产量、营养品质和农场盈利能力的影
- • 德国、捷克草业科学学者长期放牧实验：异质草地斑块中的土壤有机碳储量和地下生物量