一、99%的研究员教授不合格

“简单地说，以我以前读书的Columbia的学术标准来衡量，我所在的研究所和中国最好的大学99%的研究员教授和毕业的博士是不合格的。以美国三流大学的水平的学术标准来衡量，中国大陆99%的研究员教授和毕业的博士是不合格的。”

出自：王鸿飞先生《99%的博士和博导不合格》

http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=8116

另参阅《99%刚刚好》

http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=228326

 

二、95%的研究员教授不合格

“我敢说国内95%以上的教授的水平都比不上美国的副教授,更不用说教授了.如果你去看一看那些地方大学教授或教授级高工的水平,真会让你感觉中国教授是多么的烂.虽然论文不是评价一个学者的唯一标准,但一辈子发表不了一篇像样论文的教授也是学者吗?还有那些拿几千万元大项目的什么"863"或"973"的项目主持人,课题结题时的评审专家基本上都是关系户,责任人考虑是只是如何送礼与招待,至于业绩,基本上都是自吹自擂,反正只是专家不反对,你将毫无新意的东西说成是世界流又有何关系?”

出自：[游客]cjcjcj评论在我的博文《中科院神经所和北京生科所能成为中国科研院/所/校未来的样板吗？》

http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=248227

 

三、90%的研究员教授不合格

“I got my PhD from one of top institutes in Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Then I did postoc for 4 years in 3 US univeristies at different rankings up to one of the best in US. Now I am a Principal Scientist at R&D of a company. Based on my 13 years' observations in US, it's not particularly unfair to say most of pofessors in China is equivalent to assisstant professors in US. In top US universities, the quality of the science contributed by assistant professors is no different from those from full professors. The only difference is the younger assistant professors have less publications than full professors.

Based on my comparison, I feel full professors at top institutes of CAS and some top universities of China may be equivalent to their peers in second class US universities. I feel a number of full professors, even if they were promoted step by step along the ladder, lack of objective self-assessment of their work. They just don't how less competitive they are. However, I do believe there are about 10% of real professor in China. Hope this won't make the rest 90% unhappy.”

出自：[游客] WSHuang评论在我的博文《中科院神经所和北京生科所能成为中国科研院/所/校未来的样板吗？》

http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=248227

 

 

相关专题：关于《99%的博士和博导不合格》的讨论
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自刘进平科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-39731-249248.html

上一篇：【转载】嘴是两张皮，咋说咋有理
下一篇：七旬博导潜规则女生，该谴责谁？