||
DNA证据也可能出错
How DNA evidence went from airtight to error-prone
Faye Flam: How DNA evidence went from airtight to error-prone ...
World
How DNA evidence went from air-tight to error-prone | Commentary
Blind faith in any technology can be dangerous - especially when it comes to areas of forensic science such as DNA fingerprinting. For example, if police have "DNA evidence" against a suspect, most juries will assume that's proof of guilt. But while the technology for analyzing DNA has become vastly more sensitive since it was first introduced in courts in the 1990s, crime labs are working with ever more minute traces - sometimes just a few molecules - and drawing inconsistent or erroneous conclusions from them. In fact, there's good reason to believe DNA evidence has sent people to prison for crimes they didn't commit. That's the conclusion of a recent report commissioned by the President's
Dallas Morning News
Debate rages over quality of science in crime labs
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/11/26/debate-rages-over-quality-of-science.html
-
Police turn to AR to investigate crime scenes / World News in ...
Police turn to AR to investigate crime scenes - yahoo.com
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2024-7-23 19:27
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社