收到邀请，为某亚洲大学其年轻教员提升副教授做个评估，不确定这是不是统一标准，但至少这是一个国外大学的某个学院的标准：

(a)   How well and in what capacity do you know XXX?

(b)   How would you characterize thecandidate’s ability to do creative and significant research?

(c)   Has the candidate demonstratedindependence, and developed his own body of high quality work?

(d)   Are there specificcontributions the candidate has made that have a significant effect on hisreputation? In this context, it would be helpful to have some elaboration ofwhat these contributions are and why they are important.

(e)   What basis is there forexpecting the candidate to make significant contributions in the future?

(f)    Would the candidate comparewell with peers who have secured tenure and Associate Professorship (orequivalent) in a research university in USA or Europe? Can you cite relevantpeers of comparable standing and the universities they are associated with? WouldXXX receive tenure at your institution?

Do feel free to comment on other aspects ofXXX’s record that might be useful to an overall evaluation.

对比的是国内某高校提升教授的外审评估表

一、对被推荐人的研究方向的评价：

▲具有开创性的本学科的前沿            

▲跟踪本学科的前沿              

▲属于一般性科研              

其他补充意见：

二、对被推荐人的研究成果的评价：

▲本领域国际先进水平            

▲国内领先水平              

▲一    般              

其他补充意见：

三、对被推荐人的代表著作的评价：

四、被推荐人在相近年龄段同行中，其学术水平、创新能力等属于：

名列前茅                  优 秀                

良    好                    一 般                

其他补充意见：

五、专家对被推荐人提职的意见与看法：

▲积极推荐_________________

▲一般推荐_________________

▲不予推荐_________________

其他补充意见：

六、专家的综合看法与建议：