最近我一直在美国的SFN上与学说栏目（speculation）的主持人，对于哥本哈根学说，薜定谔方程的物理含义等物理学基本问题展开了非常激烈的争论。下面转载的是最新的一个论题，问题非常尖锐。希望广大科学工作者能感兴趣，积极参与发表您的看法。（我的注册名Jeremy0922)

Why don't we build the model of hydrogen atom independently by QM?

The model of hydrogen atom that the electron moves in the center field produced by the proton is the inevitable result with pure classical theory, and the reduced mass of the electron must be introduced to correct the result. With QM (quantum mechanics), we accept and select this model which belongs to pure classical conception to build Schrödinger equation of it, but then deny the classical motion of the electron. I think that is self-contradictory.
Since we have the perfect description about the particle by QM, so could build the model of hydrogen atom with it.
Why don't we build the model of hydrogen atom independently by QM?

more inforrnation see:

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=49857

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/s...ad.php?t=48176