读到这篇短文的朋友们好，这次分享结合自己10多年来为SSCI期刊审稿的经验(Information & management (IF 10.328)、Knowledge-based System(IF 8.139)、Aslib journal of information and management、Library Hi-tech、Electronic Library、Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association、Journal of Librarianship and Information Science、Journal of Marketing for Higher Education)，跟大家分享同行评审是如何审理一篇SSCI期刊论文的？不当之处，敬请大家批评指正，谢谢！我昨天刚开通博客，不确定这个平台的读者群体，也不知道这种分享是否有意义和价值，所以如果您看到了觉得有用，请记得给我点反馈，谢谢！

      首先，以某出版集团（不同的平台要求填写审稿意见的格式有些区别，但要填写的核心内容都差不多）旗下的期刊为例，介绍审稿的标准。

• Originality: Does the paper make a significant theoretical, empirical and/or methodological contribution to an area of importance, within the scope of the journal?

• 
  

• Relationship to Literature: Does the paper demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources? Is any significant work ignored? Is the literature review up-to-date? Has relevant material published in XXXX been cited?

• Methodology: Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts or other ideas? Has the research on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods employed appropriate and fully explained? Have issues of research ethics been adequately identified and addressed?

• Results: For empirical papers - are results presented clearly and analysed appropriately?

• Discussion/Argument: Is the relation between any empirical findings and previous work discussed? Does the paper present a robust and coherent argument? To what extent does the paper engage critically with the literature and findings? Are theoretical concepts articulated well and used appropriately? Do the conclusions adequately tie together the other elements of the paper?

• Implications for research, practice and/or society: Does the paper identify clearly any implications for research, practice and/or society? Does the paper bridge the gap between theory and practice? How can the research be used in practice (economic and commercial impact), in teaching, to influence public policy, in research (contributing to the body of knowledge)? What is the impact upon society (influencing public attitudes, affecting quality of life)? Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions of the paper?

• Quality of Communication:  Does the paper clearly express its case, measured against the technical language of the fields and the expected knowledge of the journal's readership? Has attention been paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure, jargon use, acronyms, etc.

    然后，以结构方程模型量化研究SSCI论文为例，从审稿人的视角介绍审理稿件的过程。

• 看题目：是否新颖，是否有趣，是否有吸引力

• 通读摘要：研究背景、研究目的，研究方法和数据获取，研究结果，研究意义（原创性）等。

• 通读Introduction：研究背景是否交代清楚、有吸引力，介绍基本概念，引出研究的必要性，现有研究概况，新理论新视角的介绍（创新性），研究问题的提出。

• 通读文献综述与假设提出部分：文献是否理解了，有无漏掉重要文献，是否有最新的文献，是否界定了Constructs及其测量指标，假设提出有无逻辑问题等。

• 通读Methodology部分：构念（Constructs）和具体的测量指标介绍是否清楚，数据收集过程是否介绍清楚，样本代表性是怎样保证的，抽样方法是否科学合理，选择数据分析方法和工具的理由，是否有共同方法偏差（CMB）程序控制等。

• 通读Results部分：对量化研究来说，研究结果是否清晰地展示了和恰当地分析了。SEM类的量化研究论文，主要包括测量模型和结构模型两个部分的评估（包括实际指标和推荐指标的比较等）。调查类的论文还要评估使用了数理统计方法检验是否存在严重的CMB问题和自变量的共线性问题。

• 通读Discussion部分：是否对研究发现进行了条理化的讨论，是否和现有研究结果进行了比较，是否提出了建议或策略。

• 通读Implications部分：理论启示（Theoretical implications）和实践启示（Implication for practices），是否有条理地介绍了，归纳的是否恰当。

• 通读Conclusion部分：是否在研究结果的基础上概要地总结了研究的结论，研究的局限性和后续研究展望是否准确、有说服力。

• 浏览References部分：参考文献是否著录规范，是否有不完整的地方。