|
DIKWP-TRIZ Comprehensive Version
(初学者版)
Yucong Duan
International Standardization Committee of Networked DIKWP for Artificial Intelligence Evaluation(DIKWP-SC)
World Artificial Consciousness CIC(WAC)
World Conference on Artificial Consciousness(WCAC)
(Email: duanyucong@hotmail.com)
DIKWP-TRIZ: A Detailed Framework for Innovation
Building on the foundations of DIKWP (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, Purpose) and integrating it with the principles of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), this framework aims to bridge the gap between cognitive-semantic models and systematic problem-solving in the innovation space. Here's a step-by-step proposal of DIKWP-TRIZ with detailed processes and applications.
1. DIKWP Semantics Transformation
The DIKWP-TRIZ framework leverages the key strengths of both models:
TRIZ focuses on inventive solutions by identifying contradictions and resolving them systematically through predefined inventive principles.
DIKWP is a semantic framework that maps concepts across cognitive spaces, transforming Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose into each other.
By integrating both, the DIKWP-TRIZ method allows for inventive solutions that emerge not just from identifying technical contradictions but also from semantic contradictions and cognitive mismatches between different stages of the DIKWP model.
2. The Five DIKWP Contradictions (5x5 Networked Mode)
Instead of following hierarchical models, DIKWP-TRIZ recognizes the networked nature of cognitive transformation. In the 5x5 DIKWP matrix, contradictions and transformation opportunities can occur across any pair of elements, not limited to the traditional linear Data → Information → Knowledge model.
The possible interactions are:
Data-Information
Information-Knowledge
Knowledge-Wisdom
Wisdom-Purpose
Data-Wisdom (direct transformations of low-level cognitive components into high-level cognitive purposes)
Each of these interactions represents an opportunity to apply TRIZ-like inventive solutions to semantic, technical, or conceptual contradictions.
3. Mutual Remedies through Semantic Transformations
A central innovation of DIKWP-TRIZ is its focus on solving semantic contradictions. By resolving inconsistencies, incompleteness, and imprecision in DIKWP content, the framework aligns inventive processes with cognitive patterns.
The mutual remedy principle works by transforming DIKWP elements within a 3-No framework (dealing with incomplete, inconsistent, and imprecise data). Here’s how it would look:
Incomplete Data → Wisdom: When data is missing or incomplete, knowledge and wisdom are used to fill in the gaps.
Inconsistent Information → Data: Inconsistent information is resolved by returning to data sources for verification or correction.
Imprecise Knowledge → Information: Imprecise knowledge is corrected by validating against more precise information.
Invention in DIKWP-TRIZ occurs when semantic mismatches or cognitive gaps between these transformations are resolved using innovative techniques inspired by TRIZ.
4. Cross-Space Mapping for Invention Opportunities
Traditional TRIZ offers a set of 40 inventive principles, which can be adapted within the DIKWP cognitive spaces. Each space (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, Purpose) can generate or solve contradictions. Here’s how the DIKWP-TRIZ inventive principles might apply:
Data Space: Focuses on sensory, measurable contradictions (e.g., insufficient data accuracy). Inventive principles might suggest refining data collection methods, validating inputs, or automating data verification.
Information Space: Addresses contradictions related to semantic differences, diverse interpretations, or missing links between pieces of information. DIKWP-TRIZ can suggest information fusion methods or cognitive disambiguation techniques.
Knowledge Space: Resolves contradictions in structured knowledge, such as conflicting rules or incomplete knowledge. Innovation may involve hypothesis generation, testing alternative knowledge models, or using machine learning to discover new patterns.
Wisdom Space: Deals with ethical or value-based contradictions. DIKWP-TRIZ offers inventive solutions that align technical outcomes with human values and ethics, especially in the context of AI.
Purpose Space: Resolves contradictions at the goal level, offering inventive solutions to realign organizational objectives or individual purposes.
5. Applying the DIKWP-TRIZ Matrix to Specific Examples
The following is a step-by-step breakdown of a typical DIKWP-TRIZ inventive process:
Define the Problem: Identify the input problem based on contradictions within the 3-No framework (e.g., incomplete knowledge leads to poor decision-making).
Identify Contradictions: Map the contradictions using the 5x5 DIKWP matrix (e.g., Knowledge → Wisdom contradiction where incorrect knowledge leads to unwise decisions).
Apply Inventive Principles: Choose a relevant inventive principle from TRIZ and adapt it for DIKWP. For example, the TRIZ principle of "Separation of Contradictions" can be applied to separate incomplete knowledge from the decision-making process by temporarily substituting wisdom-based heuristics.
Generate Solutions: Develop innovative solutions by transforming elements across the DIKWP spaces. In this case, you could use data validation techniques from the Data space to verify knowledge, or apply heuristic decision-making from the Wisdom space to compensate for incomplete knowledge.
Evaluate and Optimize: Continuously evaluate the solution's effectiveness and optimize the mapping between DIKWP spaces.
6. Expanding Innovation Opportunities: A Focus on 3-No Problems
Incomplete Inputs/Outputs: Solutions can be generated by transforming incomplete inputs (such as incomplete data sets or unstructured information) into structured knowledge using DIKWP-TRIZ inventive principles.
Inconsistent DIKWP Content: Use DIKWP as a consistency-checking framework to flag contradictions early in the semantic processing chain.
Imprecise Outputs: Imprecise outputs, such as vague wisdom or incomplete purposes, can be sharpened by tracing their semantic origins back through the DIKWP chain and applying inventive adjustments to improve clarity.
Example 1: Enhancing Large Language Models (LLM) with Incomplete Knowledge HandlingStep 1: Problem Identification (3-No Problem)
The issue arises with LLMs like GPT-4, where incomplete knowledge leads to imprecise outputs in certain contexts. For example, the LLM might generate technically correct answers, but lack depth or nuance when dealing with specialized knowledge domains. The challenge is to generate comprehensive, precise answers despite incomplete training data or knowledge.
Step 2: Map the Contradiction (5x5 DIKWP Network)
Here, we encounter a Knowledge-Wisdom contradiction. The LLM possesses Knowledge but struggles with applying it as Wisdom (i.e., it cannot generate high-level, decision-making insights from its incomplete knowledge base).
The transformation between Knowledge (K) and Wisdom (W) is crucial. Specifically, incomplete knowledge should be used to generate wise decisions by filling in the gaps with heuristic rules or approximations of wisdom.
Step 3: Apply DIKWP-TRIZ Inventive Principle
We choose an inventive principle such as “Separation of Contradictions” from TRIZ and adapt it to DIKWP. Here, we can separate the imprecise outputs of the LLM from its internal incomplete knowledge.
For instance, we introduce a wisdom-based heuristic layer on top of the LLM. This layer processes incomplete knowledge by referencing external sources (data), and using semantic understanding of past knowledge, applies heuristics for better decision-making. These heuristics will be based on Wisdom concepts, such as ethical considerations, values, and user preferences, which can supplement the missing knowledge.
Step 4: Generate Solution
In the final stage, the LLM integrates incomplete knowledge with a wisdom-driven layer that compensates for gaps through heuristic decision-making. The LLM becomes capable of identifying when its knowledge is incomplete and can employ external knowledge sources or semantic reasoning to provide a more complete answer.
This process showcases how DIKWP-TRIZ resolves contradictions within the knowledge-wisdom interaction by applying cognitive-level decision-making in real-time, improving the system’s ability to generate well-rounded answers even when knowledge is incomplete.
Example 2: Patentable Innovation for Medical Diagnosis using DIKWP-TRIZStep 1: Problem Identification (Inconsistent Knowledge-Information Transition)
In a medical diagnostic system, there may be inconsistent knowledge about patient data and medical history due to incomplete or missing records. These inconsistencies result in imprecise information used for diagnostic purposes.
Step 2: Map the Contradiction (5x5 DIKWP Network)
In this case, we encounter a Data-Knowledge contradiction. The medical diagnostic system’s data (patient records) contains inconsistencies or missing elements, but it is expected to generate knowledge-based conclusions (diagnosis). The contradiction arises because the data is incomplete, yet the system must generate knowledge from it.
Step 3: Apply DIKWP-TRIZ Inventive Principle
Using the mutual remedy principle from DIKWP-TRIZ, the system will attempt to validate inconsistent information through additional data collection, and cross-referencing external sources of knowledge to fill in the gaps.
The inventive principle applied here is "Use of External Resources" from TRIZ, adapted to the DIKWP system. The system automatically queries external medical databases, such as genetic markers or similar case studies, to provide additional contextual information. This allows the system to resolve the Data-Knowledge contradiction by enriching its data with external knowledge, thereby transforming incomplete patient records into actionable knowledge.
Step 4: Generate Solution
The solution involves a semantic validation process where the system flags incomplete data and supplements it with external knowledge sources (e.g., global medical databases or clinical trials). The system then applies a decision-making model (wisdom) to generate a diagnosis based on the supplemented knowledge, improving the system’s diagnostic accuracy despite initial data gaps.
This patented invention could represent a novel AI-based diagnostic tool that leverages the DIKWP transformation principles to intelligently resolve incomplete and inconsistent patient data, creating a commercially viable product for healthcare providers.
Example 3: Optimizing Autonomous Vehicle Navigation Using DIKWP-TRIZStep 1: Problem Identification (Imprecise Data Impacting Safety Decisions)
Autonomous vehicles face challenges when dealing with imprecise sensor data caused by environmental factors like rain, fog, or obstacles. This leads to issues in making safety-critical navigation decisions, as the vehicle’s system might not fully comprehend the surroundings.
Step 2: Map the Contradiction (5x5 DIKWP Network)
This involves a Data-Wisdom contradiction. The sensor data (D) is unreliable or imprecise, but the system must make wise decisions (W) regarding the safest path forward. The challenge is to compensate for the lack of clarity in the data while maintaining safety and efficiency.
Step 3: Apply DIKWP-TRIZ Inventive Principle
The principle applied here is "Segmentation" from TRIZ, which suggests breaking down the problem into manageable parts. In the DIKWP context, we can break down the Data-Wisdom transformation into smaller units of analysis and apply Wisdom based on partial data.
For example, we could integrate multiple small independent decision-making modules that work with fragmented data. Each module processes a subset of the available sensor data and makes localized, context-aware decisions. This reduces the cognitive load on the system and allows it to aggregate partial data insights into a complete decision.
Step 4: Generate Solution
The vehicle’s navigation system can implement adaptive decision-making algorithms that operate even under incomplete sensor data. These algorithms segment the navigation environment into smaller areas, allowing each sensor to analyze the local environment with heuristic adjustments based on Wisdom (prior knowledge, rules about safety margins, or common driving patterns). The system makes real-time adjustments to its route, ensuring optimal safety even with incomplete or imprecise data.
This method, based on segmentation of the data and wisdom layers, provides a potential for patenting a unique adaptive navigation system for autonomous vehicles that ensures safety without requiring perfect data.
Example 4: Intelligent Energy Grid Management Using DIKWP-TRIZStep 1: Problem Identification (Inconsistent Information Leading to Energy Distribution Inefficiencies)
Smart energy grids often deal with inconsistent real-time data about energy demand and supply due to fluctuations in usage, unpredictable renewable energy inputs (solar, wind), and communication issues. These inconsistencies can lead to inefficient energy distribution and blackouts.
Step 2: Map the Contradiction (5x5 DIKWP Network)
This involves an Information-Knowledge contradiction. The energy grid possesses inconsistent information (I) about the real-time energy requirements and supply levels. However, it needs to convert this into consistent knowledge (K) to manage and distribute energy effectively.
Step 3: Apply DIKWP-TRIZ Inventive Principle
Using the "Local Quality" principle from TRIZ, adapted to the DIKWP model, we can create local energy distribution nodes that independently manage their specific areas based on available data. The Information-Knowledge transformation in each local node can handle inconsistencies and still provide localized optimization.
Instead of relying on central processing of all energy grid information, the system can apply local heuristics and knowledge rules to manage energy flow based on regional conditions. For instance, one part of the grid may receive more renewable energy inputs, while another may rely more on traditional power sources. Each region’s energy node can independently balance its local inputs and regional energy demands.
Step 4: Generate Solution
The solution is a decentralized, intelligent energy grid where each node applies local information to optimize energy flow. Inconsistent information about energy input (e.g., from wind turbines) is compensated by using local knowledge about expected energy demand patterns in that region. The system dynamically reallocates energy based on each node’s real-time data, ensuring efficient distribution even when global information is inconsistent.
This method can be patented as a smart, decentralized energy grid management system, where information inconsistencies are remedied by localized knowledge-based adjustments for efficient and sustainable energy distribution.
Conclusion:
The first 2 examples illustrate how DIKWP-TRIZ can be applied to resolve complex contradictions by combining inventive principles with semantic and cognitive transformations. This framework opens up numerous patenting opportunities across diverse fields like AI, healthcare, and decision-making systems, enabling transparent, adaptive, and efficient solutions for today’s most challenging problems.
Two additional examples demonstrate how DIKWP-TRIZ can be used to resolve data, information, and knowledge inconsistencies in various fields. By applying inventive principles from TRIZ and integrating them with DIKWP-based semantic transformations, this framework offers novel, patentable solutions for a wide range of modern challenges—from autonomous navigation to intelligent energy grid management.
Building a tool of DIKWP-TRIZ
Building a DIKWP-TRIZ tool step-by-step involves integrating the conceptual framework of DIKWP with the systematic problem-solving principles of TRIZ, creating a powerful approach for tackling contradictions and generating innovative solutions in various domains. Below is a detailed step-by-step plan for building this tool:Step 1: Define the Core Structure of DIKWP-TRIZ
1.1 Understand DIKWP Model:
Data: The raw facts or observations.
Information: Processed data, revealing relationships.
Knowledge: Structured information forming patterns or systems.
Wisdom: Ethical or strategic application of knowledge.
Purpose: The overarching goal driving the system.
Each element interacts with others in a networked, non-hierarchical fashion, creating dynamic relationships between them. The 5x5 DIKWP network (DI, DK, DP, etc.) defines the interaction among these components.
1.2 Understand TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving):TRIZ identifies inventive principles to resolve contradictions in technical or system-level challenges. These principles (like Segmentation, Local Quality, and Dynamization) are used to solve problems innovatively.
Step 2: Map DIKWP to TRIZ
2.1 Map Contradictions in DIKWP Terms:
Identify contradictions in the relationships between Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose. For example:
Contradiction in Data-Wisdom: Raw data may be insufficient for wise decisions, creating a gap.
Contradiction in Information-Knowledge: Information might be inconsistent or incomplete, preventing reliable knowledge.
2.2 Apply TRIZ Principles:
Use the 40 TRIZ principles to resolve the contradictions identified in the DIKWP structure. For instance:
Segmentation for breaking down complex systems (Data → Wisdom).
Local Quality for adapting solutions to local conditions (Information → Knowledge).
Dynamization for increasing flexibility in transformations (Purpose → Data).
Step 3: Develop Core Functions of the DIKWP-TRIZ Tool
3.1 Input Module (Problem Definition):
Users provide input data in terms of a problem scenario, defining the system in terms of DIKWP relationships. For instance, "Inconsistent Information leading to incorrect Knowledge formation."
Input Format: Select one or more DIKWP elements involved in the contradiction (e.g., Information → Knowledge).
Output Format: Define the desired output (e.g., accurate Knowledge or complete Data).
3.2 Contradiction Resolution Engine:
The tool applies the mapped TRIZ principles based on the contradictions between the chosen DIKWP elements.
The tool suggests inventive solutions based on how TRIZ principles can resolve the specific contradiction (e.g., Segmentation, Dynamization).
3.3 Visualization and Workflow Management:
Graphical Interface: The tool visualizes the 5x5 DIKWP interactions, showing the selected contradiction.
Step-by-Step Solution Path: Each TRIZ solution is broken down into actionable steps. For example, "Segment Data for localized Wisdom application" would show each sub-step graphically.
Step 4: Build the Problem-Solving Engine
4.1 Integrate TRIZ Solution Library:
A database of TRIZ principles linked to each DIKWP element. For example:
Segmentation applies to Data-Wisdom contradictions.
Local Quality applies to Information-Knowledge contradictions.
4.2 Incorporate AI for Suggestive Reasoning:
AI-driven analysis can assist in identifying the most relevant TRIZ principle for a given DIKWP contradiction. Machine learning models trained on historical problem-solving patterns can be incorporated to suggest the best principle for resolving contradictions.
Step 5: Prototype Development
5.1 User Interface:
Simple UI for Inputs: Users can input a problem description, selecting the involved DIKWP elements.
Step-by-Step Outputs: The tool will display possible TRIZ principles and their detailed application to the specific DIKWP scenario.
5.2 Integration with Existing Solutions:
The tool should offer compatibility with other problem-solving frameworks (like Lean Six Sigma) or existing AI solutions (like GPT-based systems).
Step 6: Test the Tool with Real-World Problems
6.1 Create Test Cases:
Use real-world case studies in fields such as autonomous systems, energy management, or large language models (LLMs).
Example: Test the tool’s ability to solve imprecise sensor data in autonomous vehicles (as described in the earlier example).
6.2 Evaluate the Performance:
Check how the tool provides effective and innovative solutions using DIKWP-TRIZ principles.
Compare the results against traditional problem-solving methods to show the effectiveness of this model.
Step 7: Launch and Continuous Improvement
7.1 Open Beta Testing:
Release the tool for open beta testing with selected organizations or industries that deal with complex contradictions (e.g., AI companies, automotive, energy grids).
7.2 Collect Feedback and Refine:
Gather user feedback on how intuitive the tool is and how effective the suggested solutions are.
Refine the TRIZ principles applied to DIKWP interactions based on the complexity of different scenarios.
7.3 Incorporate New Inventive Principles:
Continuously update the tool with new TRIZ principles or adaptations for specific industries.
By following this structured step-by-step approach, the DIKWP-TRIZ tool will be able to deliver actionable, inventive solutions to complex problems. It provides a flexible framework for both technical systems (autonomous driving, smart grids) and cognitive AI systems, making it a valuable resource for innovation in various fields.
Comparing DIKWP-TRIZ with Traditional TRIZ
When comparing DIKWP-TRIZ to traditional TRIZ, the two approaches share some core methodologies around inventive problem-solving but differ significantly in their conceptual structures, applicability, and the way they handle data, knowledge, and contradictions. Below is a detailed comparison between DIKWP-TRIZ and traditional TRIZ across various dimensions:
1. Conceptual Framework
Traditional TRIZ:
TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), developed by Genrich Altshuller, is based on analyzing patterns of inventions and identifying universal principles for solving technical contradictions. It focuses on technical and physical systems, utilizing a hierarchical set of 40 inventive principles to resolve conflicts between elements (e.g., function vs. efficiency).
TRIZ primarily operates at the technical level, addressing contradictions in engineering and product development (e.g., increasing strength while reducing weight).
DIKWP-TRIZ:
DIKWP-TRIZ is a specialized extension based on the DIKWP model, incorporating Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose as core cognitive elements. It introduces a networked rather than hierarchical structure, emphasizing dynamic interactions between these elements, and targets a broader range of cognitive, ethical, and purpose-driven challenges.
DIKWP-TRIZ moves beyond technical and physical systems to include cognitive systems, artificial intelligence, and semantic spaces, where contradictions are resolved by leveraging the non-hierarchical transformation among DIKWP components. For instance, contradictions between incomplete or inconsistent knowledge and inaccurate data can be addressed through semantic transformations across DIKWP content.
2. Handling Contradictions
Traditional TRIZ:
TRIZ defines contradictions primarily in terms of conflicting physical properties or system requirements (e.g., a product that must be both strong and lightweight). The method involves resolving these contradictions through inventive principles such as Separation in Time or Segmentation.
Contradictions are typically resolved in a binary manner: addressing either one property without compromising the other, or finding ways to satisfy both simultaneously.
DIKWP-TRIZ:
In DIKWP-TRIZ, contradictions are not limited to physical properties but can involve cognitive, semantic, or knowledge-based issues, such as conflicting wisdom or incomplete information. It emphasizes resolving contradictions within the DIKWP network by transforming or complementing incomplete/inconsistent data, information, or knowledge.
DIKWP-TRIZ allows for more complex contradictions (such as ethical conflicts or incomplete knowledge) to be handled within the dynamic DIKWP space, making it suitable for high-level problems in AI or systems that require purpose-driven resolutions.
3. Invention Process and Creativity
Traditional TRIZ:
Traditional TRIZ uses a systematic and algorithmic approach to innovation, identifying patterns in global inventions and applying them to new problems. The invention process in TRIZ is deterministic and driven by empirical knowledge from existing technical solutions.
TRIZ relies on known contradictions and leverages the established 40 inventive principles to propose systematic solutions. For example, "Segmentation" may suggest dividing a system into smaller parts to solve a technical contradiction.
DIKWP-TRIZ:
DIKWP-TRIZ applies semantic transformations and interactions between Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose to generate solutions. It encourages more adaptive and purpose-driven innovation, focusing on mapping between conceptual and semantic spaces. The system allows for emergent creativity, where contradictions within one component (e.g., incomplete data) can be transformed and complemented by another (e.g., wisdom or knowledge).
Instead of just using physical principles, DIKWP-TRIZ also incorporates cognitive reasoning and ethical considerations. For instance, in AI ethics, DIKWP-TRIZ might handle the contradiction between algorithmic efficiency and moral fairness by exploring interactions between the wisdom and purpose elements.
4. Flexibility and Applicability
Traditional TRIZ:
Traditional TRIZ is highly effective for physical and engineering systems, particularly in product design and mechanical engineering. Its applicability is primarily in technical domains like automotive, aerospace, and industrial product design, where system constraints and contradictions can be clearly identified.
The structured, principle-based approach works well for well-defined engineering problems but is limited in handling high-level cognitive, social, or ethical dilemmas.
DIKWP-TRIZ:
DIKWP-TRIZ extends the application to more abstract, conceptual, and cognitive domains, including fields like artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, ethics, and even social decision-making. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where contradictions involve incomplete, inconsistent, or imprecise data and where knowledge gaps exist.
Its networked nature allows for solving problems that involve multiple layers of uncertainty, typical in AI development (e.g., natural language processing), or decision-making systems that need to balance ethical considerations with technical performance.
5. Resolution of Incomplete and Inconsistent Information
Traditional TRIZ:
TRIZ does not explicitly focus on the incompleteness or inconsistency of input information or knowledge. The assumption is that sufficient technical data exists to analyze the contradictions, and the principles apply based on known parameters.
Its focus is on optimization rather than addressing the uncertainty in the problem space.
DIKWP-TRIZ:
DIKWP-TRIZ integrates solutions for the 3-No problem by Prof. Yucong Duan (i.e., incomplete, inconsistent, and imprecise DIKWP input/output). It resolves contradictions where knowledge or data may be missing, inconsistent, or unreliable by leveraging the mutual transformation between DIKWP elements (e.g., using data to validate knowledge, using wisdom to correct inconsistent information).
This makes DIKWP-TRIZ more adept at handling problems with uncertainty or incomplete information, which is critical for developing artificial consciousness systems or AI models where data might be noisy or imprecise.
6. Applications in AI and Cognitive Systems
Traditional TRIZ:
Although TRIZ can be applied to technical problems in AI (such as optimizing algorithms or resolving computational inefficiencies), its framework is not inherently designed for cognitive systems or AI ethics.
It deals with problem-solving in a more mechanical or physical sense, making it harder to apply to semantic-level challenges in AI, such as natural language understanding or ethical AI development.
DIKWP-TRIZ:
DIKWP-TRIZ is designed to address high-level AI problems, especially in systems requiring artificial consciousness or ethical reasoning. It can handle contradictions between algorithmic complexity and human values, leveraging wisdom and purpose to ensure AI systems align with ethical standards.
It is also useful for enhancing LLM models like GPT-4, where contradictions between imprecise language input and output (knowledge) can be handled by integrating purpose-driven transformations within the DIKWP network.
Summary Table: Traditional TRIZ vs. DIKWP-TRIZ
Aspect | Traditional TRIZ | DIKWP-TRIZ |
---|---|---|
Framework | Hierarchical (Physical/Technical Systems) | Networked (Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose) |
Focus | Physical contradictions (e.g., strength vs. weight) | Cognitive, semantic, and ethical contradictions |
Problem Handling | Known contradictions in technical systems | Incomplete, inconsistent, and imprecise data/knowledge |
Solution Approach | 40 Inventive Principles (Segmentation, etc.) | Semantic transformations among DIKWP elements |
Innovation Process | Systematic, deterministic, technical | Adaptive, emergent, and purpose-driven |
Applicability | Engineering, product design, manufacturing | AI, cognitive systems, ethics, semantic problems |
Handling of Uncertainty | Assumes complete data | Handles incomplete and inconsistent data/knowledge |
Application in AI | Limited to technical optimization | Extensive in AI ethics, LLMs, artificial consciousness |
DIKWP-TRIZ builds on traditional TRIZ principles but extends them to handle more complex, abstract, and semantic-level contradictions. By leveraging the networked structure of DIKWP and addressing the 3-No problem, DIKWP-TRIZ can solve challenges that traditional TRIZ might not, particularly in the domains of AI, ethics, and advanced cognitive systems.
Here’s a detailed table comparing Traditional TRIZ and DIKWP-TRIZ, highlighting the differences across key aspects:
Aspect | Traditional TRIZ | DIKWP-TRIZ |
---|---|---|
Framework | Hierarchical (focuses on technical/physical contradictions) | Networked (Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom-Purpose interactions) |
Problem Focus | Technical contradictions (e.g., function vs. efficiency) | Cognitive, semantic, and ethical contradictions, handling uncertainty in AI |
Approach to Contradictions | Resolves physical contradictions using 40 inventive principles | Uses networked DIKWP interactions to resolve contradictions between incomplete data, inconsistent knowledge, etc. |
Resolution Method | Inventive principles like Segmentation, Separation, and Merging | Transformation and complementarity across DIKWP elements, such as using data to correct knowledge or wisdom to resolve ethical conflicts |
Innovation Process | Deterministic and systematic, based on analysis of past inventions | Adaptive, emergent, purpose-driven, capable of handling incomplete/inconsistent input-output pairs |
Handling of Uncertainty | Assumes complete or well-defined data, focuses on technical solutions | Explicitly deals with the 3-No Problem (incomplete, inconsistent, imprecise data) and resolves it through semantic transformations |
Focus on Cognitive Systems | Primarily used for technical problem solving in engineering and design | Designed to solve problems in AI, cognitive systems, artificial consciousness, with emphasis on ethical AI and purpose-driven decision-making |
Applicability | Engineering, product design, mechanical systems, manufacturing | AI development, Large Language Models (LLMs), ethical decision-making, cognitive and semantic problem-solving |
Handling Ethical Issues | Not designed to resolve moral or ethical contradictions | Handles ethical dilemmas by integrating Wisdom and Purpose, ensuring alignment with ethical principles in AI development |
Invention Space | Based on 40 principles applied in hierarchical order | Networked 5x5 model of DIKWP interactions, where all elements can influence each other (e.g., Data can influence Wisdom, Knowledge can alter Data) |
Scope of Application | Engineering, industrial design, optimization, physical inventions | Artificial Intelligence, consciousness systems, large-scale decision-making, solving high-level ethical and semantic problems |
Invention Complexity | Resolves well-defined technical issues using established principles | Solves high-complexity issues with unknowns or incomplete data through transformation in the DIKWP space |
Example Comparison
Traditional TRIZ Example | DIKWP-TRIZ Example |
---|---|
Contradiction: Need to make a material stronger while keeping it lightweight | Contradiction: Need to optimize AI's decision-making efficiency while maintaining fairness and ethical standards |
TRIZ Solution: Use Segmentation or Merging principles to divide or combine material properties | DIKWP-TRIZ Solution: Use Wisdom to introduce ethical constraints while leveraging Knowledge and Purpose to optimize for both decision accuracy and fairness |
This table provides a clearer understanding of how DIKWP-TRIZ extends the capabilities of traditional TRIZ by addressing more abstract, cognitive, and ethical contradictions, making it suitable for advanced AI systems and artificial consciousness.
Conclusion: DIKWP-TRIZ as a Systematic Innovation Tool
DIKWP-TRIZ is a highly structured and scalable approach for driving innovation. It systematically analyzes contradictions across networked cognitive spaces and provides inventive solutions based on the interaction between Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose. This combined framework integrates the cognitive power of DIKWP with the problem-solving methodology of TRIZ, offering unique opportunities to invent new solutions, particularly in fields such as Artificial Intelligence, consciousness systems, and semantic transformation models.
By adopting the DIKWP-TRIZ approach, organizations and researchers can explore new avenues for creating patents, systems, and solutions that are both technologically advanced and philosophically grounded. This fusion ensures that innovation remains aligned with both technical objectives and cognitive coherence, paving the way for the next generation of AI inventions.
1/1 | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閻愵剙鍔ゆ繝鈧柆宥呯劦妞ゆ帒鍊归崵鈧柣搴㈠嚬閸欏啫鐣峰畷鍥ь棜閻庯絻鍔嬪Ч妤呮⒑閸︻厼鍔嬮柛銊ョ秺瀹曟劙鎮欏顔藉瘜闂侀潧鐗嗗Λ妤冪箔閹烘挶浜滈柨鏂跨仢瀹撳棛鈧鍠楅悡锟犮€侀弮鍫濋唶闁绘柨寮剁€氬ジ姊绘担鍛婂暈缂佽鍊婚埀顒佸嚬閸o綁宕洪姀鈥崇窞闁归偊鍘鹃崢鍗炩攽閳藉棗鐏犻柣蹇旂箖缁傚秹宕烽鐘碉紲濡炪倖妫侀崑鎰櫠閿旈敮鍋撶憴鍕闁靛牊鎮傞獮鍐閵忋垻鐓撻梺鍓茬厛閸犳洜妲愰悢灏佹斀闁绘ɑ鍓氶崯蹇涙煕閻樻剚娈滈柕鍡楀暣瀹曘劑顢橀崶銊р槈閾绘牠鏌涘☉鍗炲箻妞わ富鍣e娲箰鎼淬垻顦ラ梺绋匡工缂嶅﹪骞冮敓鐘参ㄩ柨鏂垮⒔閻﹀牓姊婚崒姘卞缂佸甯¢弫宥咁吋閸℃洜绠氶梺鍦帛鐢骞夐崫銉х<閺夊牄鍔屽ù顕€鏌熼瑙勬珚闁诡喗绮岃灒闁绘挸瀛╅柨顓熺節閻㈤潧鍓崇紒鑼舵鐓ら柕鍫濐槹閺呮繃銇勮箛鎾村櫢缂佽妫濋弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ュ┑锛勫仒缁瑩寮诲☉銏犵疀闁靛⿵闄勯悵鏇㈡⒑閸濆嫭顥欓柛妤€鍟块~蹇曠磼濡顎撻梺鍛婄☉閿曘儵宕曢幘缁樷拺鐟滅増甯楅弫閬嶆煕閵娿儲璐℃俊鍙夊姍閹瑧鈧稒锚椤庢捇姊洪崨濠冨碍鐎殿喖澧庣槐鐐存償閵婏腹鎷洪梺璇″瀻閸涱垼鍟堟俊鐐€ら崑鍕囬鐐村仼闂佸灝顑呯欢鐐烘煙闁箑骞橀柛姗嗕簼缁绘繈鎮介棃娑楃捕闂佽绻戠换鍫濈暦濠靛棌鍫柛顐ゅ枔閸樿棄鈹戦悩缁樻锭閻庢凹鍓熼幃姗€宕f径瀣伎婵犵數濮撮崯顖炲Φ濠靛鐓欐い鏃€鍎抽崢瀵糕偓娈垮枛閻栧ジ鐛幇顓熷劅妞ゆ柨鍚嬮弳蹇涙⒒閸屾艾鈧兘鎳楅崼鏇炵疇闁规崘顕ч崥褰掓煛瀹ュ骸骞栫紒鐙€鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏�:1 | 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈攻閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄闁哄绶氶弻娑樷槈濮楀牊鏁鹃梺鍛婄懃缁绘﹢寮婚敐澶婄婵犲灚鍔栫紞妤呮⒑闁偛鑻晶顕€鏌涙繝鍌涘仴妤犵偞鍔栫换婵嬪礃椤忓棗楠勯梻浣稿暱閹碱偊顢栭崶鈺冪煋妞ゆ棃鏁崑鎾舵喆閸曨剛锛橀梺鍛婃⒐閸ㄧ敻顢氶敐澶婇唶闁哄洨鍋熼娲⒑缂佹ḿ鎳冮柟铏姍閻涱噣濮€閵堝棌鎷婚梺绋挎湰閻燂妇绮婇悧鍫涗簻妞ゆ劑鍩勫Σ鎼佹煟閿濆懎妲婚摶锝夋偠濞戞帒澧查柣蹇撳暙閳规垿鎮欓弶鎴犱桓缂佺偓婢樼粔褰掋€侀弴鐔侯浄閻庯綆鍋嗛崢顏堟⒑閸撴彃浜濈紒璇插暣瀹曨垶骞掑Δ浣哄幐闂佸憡鍔戦崝搴㈡櫠濞戙垺鐓涢柛娑卞枤閸欌偓闂佸搫鏈粙鎴﹀煡婢舵劕纭€闁绘劘灏欓鎴炵節閻㈤潧浠滈柣妤€锕幃锟犲灳閹颁焦缍庨梺鎯х箰濠€閬嶆儗濞嗘劗绠鹃柛鈩兠崝銈夋煕閹惧瓨绶叉い顏勫暣婵″爼宕卞Δ鍐ф樊婵$偑鍊х粻鎾翅缚瑜旈、姘舵晲閸℃瑧鐦堝┑顔斤供閸樿棄鈻嶅⿰鍫熲拺闁告稑锕﹂埥澶愭煕婵犲偆鐓肩€规洜澧楅幆鏃堝Ω閵壯冨箳闂佺懓鍚嬮悾顏堝礉瀹€鈧划璇差潩鏉堛劌鏋戦柟鍏兼儗閻撳牓寮繝鍥ㄧ厱闁哄洢鍔岄悘锟犳煟閹惧鈽夋い顓℃硶閹瑰嫰鎮滃鍡橈紒婵犵數鍋涢幊搴∥涘☉姘潟闁圭儤姊圭€氭岸鏌ょ喊鍗炲妞わ絽鎼—鍐Χ鎼粹€茬盎缂備胶绮敃銏ょ嵁閺嶎厼鎹舵い鎾跺枎閺嬪倿姊洪崨濠冨闁稿妫濋弫宥堢疀濞戞瑢鎷绘繛鎾村焹閸嬫挻绻涙担鍐插娴犳岸姊绘担鍛靛湱鈧稈鏅犻幃锟犳晸閻樿尙鐣洪梺姹囧灮鏋い顐㈡嚇閺屾洟宕煎┑鍥舵闂佸綊鏀卞钘夘潖濞差亝鍤掗柕鍫濇噺閻庢儳鈹戦悩顔肩仾闁挎岸鏌嶇紒妯诲磳闁糕晪绻濆畷銊╊敊閹冪闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲垂椤栫偛纾归柡宥庡亐閸嬫挸顫濋悙顒€顏� | 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈攻閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄闁哄绶氶弻娑樷槈濮楀牊鏁鹃梺鍛婄懃缁绘﹢寮婚敐澶婄闁挎繂妫Λ鍕⒑閸濆嫷鍎庣紒鑸靛哺瀵鎮㈤崗灏栨嫽闁诲酣娼ф竟濠偽i鍓х<闁绘劦鍓欓崝銈嗐亜椤撶姴鍘寸€殿喖顭烽弫鎰緞婵犲嫮鏉告俊鐐€栫敮濠囨倿閿曞倸纾块柟鍓х帛閳锋垿鏌熼懖鈺佷粶濠碘€炽偢閺屾稒绻濋崒娑樹淮閻庢鍠涢褔鍩ユ径鎰潊闁冲搫鍊瑰▍鍥⒒娴g懓顕滅紒璇插€歌灋婵炴垟鎳為崶顒€唯鐟滃繒澹曢挊澹濆綊鏁愰崨顔藉創閻忓繐绻樺娲川婵犲孩鐣锋繝鐢靛仜閿曘倝顢氶敐鍡欑瘈婵﹩鍘兼禍婊堟⒑缁嬭法绠伴柣銊у厴楠炲繑绻濆顓犲幗闁硅壈鎻徊楣冨汲閳哄懎鍑犳い蹇撳閺€浠嬫煃閵夈劌鐨洪柣顓熺懄閹便劍绻濋崘鈹夸虎閻庤娲﹂崑濠傜暦閻旂⒈鏁嗛柍褜鍓欓埢宥夊Χ閸モ晝锛濇繛杈剧悼閻℃棃宕靛▎鎾寸厽婵°倓鐒︾亸顓熴亜閺囶亞绋荤紒缁樼箓椤繈顢栭埞鐐珚闁哄本娲樺鍕醇濠靛牅鐥梻浣告惈閸婄敻宕戦幘缁樷拻闁稿本鐟ㄩ崗宀€鐥鐐靛煟鐎规洘绮岄埞鎴犫偓锝庡亝濞呮梻绱撻崒姘偓鐑芥倿閿曞倸绀夐柡宥庡幗閸庡孩銇勯弽銊ュ毈婵炲吋鐗楃换娑橆啅椤旇崵鐩庨悗鐟版啞缁诲倿鍩為幋锔藉亹闁圭粯甯╅崝澶愭⒑娴兼瑧鎮奸柛蹇旓耿楠炲啫螖閸涱厾顦ф繝銏f硾閿曪絾绔熼弴銏♀拻濞达絽鎽滅粔鐑樹繆椤愩儲纭剁紒顔肩墛閹峰懘鎼归柅娑氱憹闂備礁鎼粔鏌ュ礉鐎n剚宕查柛鈩冪⊕閻撳繘鏌涢锝囩畵闁逞屽墮閹诧紕绮嬪鍡愬亝闁告劏鏂侀幏娲煟鎼粹剝璐″┑顔炬暬钘熷璺侯儍娴滄粓鏌ㄩ弮鍥跺殭闁诲骏绠撻弻娑㈠煘閸喚浠煎銈嗘尭閵堢ǹ鐣烽崡鐐嶇喖鎳栭埞顑惧€濆缁樼瑹閳ь剙岣胯閸e綊姊洪崨濠佺繁闁搞劍澹嗛弫顕€骞掗弮鍌滐紳闂佺ǹ鏈懝楣冨焵椤掑嫷妫戠紒顔肩墛缁楃喖鍩€椤掆偓閻g兘骞囬弶澶哥炊闂侀潧锛忛崨顖氬脯闂傚倷绀佸﹢閬嶆惞鎼淬劌绐楅柟鎹愵嚙绾惧鏌熺€涙ḿ璐╃憸鐗堝笒缁€鍌炴煕韫囨艾浜圭紒瀣喘濮婄粯鎷呯粙鑳煘濠电偛妯婇崣鍐嚕婵犳碍鏅插璺猴攻椤ユ繈姊洪崷顓€鍦偓娑掓櫊瀹曟洟骞樼紒妯衡偓鍨箾閸繄浠㈤柡瀣枎閳规垿鎮欑拠褍浼愬銈庡亜缁绘帞妲愰幒鎳崇喓鎷犲顔瑰亾閹剧粯鈷戦柟顖嗗懐顔婇梺纭呮珪閹稿墽鍒掗銏犵伋闁哄倶鍎查弬鈧梻浣虹帛閸旀牞銇愰崘顏嗘/鐟滄棃寮婚敐鍛傛棃宕橀妸鎰╁灲閺岋綁鏁愰崶褍骞嬪Δ鐘靛仜濞差厼顕i崼鏇炵閹艰揪绱曢妶璺衡攽閿涘嫬浜奸柛濠冪墵楠炴劙鎳¢妶鍥╃厯闂佺懓顕崑鐔笺€呴弻銉︾厽闁逛即娼ф晶顖炴煕濞嗗繒绠插ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑饪伴崘銊ょ帛濠电偛鐡ㄧ划鎾剁不閺嶎厼绠栨俊銈傚亾妞ゎ偅绻堥幃娆擃敆閳ь剟顢旈敓锟� | 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈攻閸欏繘鏌i幋锝嗩棄闁哄绶氶弻娑樷槈濮楀牊鏁鹃梺鍛婄懃缁绘﹢寮婚敐澶婄闁挎繂妫Λ鍕⒑閸濆嫷鍎庣紒鑸靛哺瀵鎮㈤崗灏栨嫽闁诲酣娼ф竟濠偽i鍓х<闁绘劦鍓欓崝銈嗐亜椤撶姴鍘寸€殿喖顭烽弫鎰緞婵犲嫮鏉告俊鐐€栫敮濠囨倿閿曞倸纾块柟鍓х帛閳锋垿鏌熼懖鈺佷粶濠碘€炽偢閺屾稒绻濋崒娑樹淮閻庢鍠涢褔鍩ユ径鎰潊闁冲搫鍊瑰▍鍥⒒娴g懓顕滅紒璇插€歌灋婵炴垟鎳為崶顒€唯鐟滃繒澹曢挊澹濆綊鏁愰崨顔藉創閻忓繐绻樺娲川婵犲孩鐣锋繝鐢靛仜閿曘倝顢氶敐鍡欑瘈婵﹩鍘兼禍婊堟⒑缁嬭法绠伴柣銊у厴楠炲繑绻濆顓犲幗闁硅壈鎻槐鏇熺濞戙垺鐓熼柍鈺佸暞缁€鍫㈢磼椤曞棛鍒伴摶鏍煕濞戝崬鏋撻柟閿嬫そ閺屸剝寰勭仦鎴掓勃婵犮垻鎳撳Λ婵婃闂佹寧娲栭崐褰掑磹閸偅鍙忔慨妤€妫楁禍婊呪偓瑙勬尭濡盯鍩€椤掍緡鍟忛柛鐘崇洴椤㈡俺顦归柛鈹垮劜瀵板嫰骞囬澶嬬秱闂備胶绮摫鐟滄澘鍟扮划濠囶敋閳ь剙顫忕紒妯肩懝闁逞屽墮宀h儻顦抽柣蹇旂懇濮婅櫣绮欓幐搴℃敪婵炲瓨绮犻崜娑㈠礆閹烘梻纾兼俊顖濆亹閻﹀牆鈹戦鏂や緵闁告ɑ鎮傞獮蹇撁洪鍛嫼闂佸憡绋戦敃锕傚煡婢跺娈版い蹇撴噺缂嶆垿鏌嶇紒妯诲磳鐎殿喗鎸抽幃鈺咁敃椤厼顥氶梻浣呵圭换鎰八囬娑氼洸濡わ絽鍟埛鎴犳喐閻楀牆绗氶柨娑氬枔缁辨帡鍩€椤掍焦濯撮柧蹇涒偓娑氱憹闂備礁鎼粔鏌ュ礉鐎n剚宕查柛鈩冪⊕閻撳繘鏌涢锝囩畵闁逞屽墮閹诧紕绮嬪鍡愬亝闁告劏鏂侀幏娲煟鎼粹剝璐″┑顔炬暬钘熷璺侯儍娴滄粓鏌ㄩ弮鍥跺殭闁诲骏绠撻弻娑㈠煘閸喚浠煎銈嗘尭閵堢ǹ鐣烽崡鐐嶇喖鎳栭埞顑惧€濆缁樼瑹閳ь剙岣胯閸e綊姊洪崨濠佺繁闁搞劍澹嗛弫顕€骞掗弮鍌滐紳闂佺ǹ鏈懝楣冨焵椤掑嫷妫戠紒顔肩墛缁楃喖鍩€椤掆偓閻g兘骞囬弶澶哥炊闂侀潧锛忛崨顖氬脯闂傚倷绀佸﹢閬嶆惞鎼淬劌绐楅柟鎹愵嚙绾惧鏌熺€涙ḿ璐╃憸鐗堝笒缁€鍌炴煕韫囨艾浜圭紒瀣喘濮婄粯鎷呯粙鑳煘濠电偛妯婇崣鍐嚕婵犳碍鏅插璺猴攻椤ユ繈姊洪崷顓€鍦偓娑掓櫊瀹曟洟骞樼紒妯衡偓鍨箾閸繄浠㈤柡瀣枎閳规垿鎮欑拠褍浼愬銈庡亜缁绘帞妲愰幒鎳崇喓鎷犲顔瑰亾閹剧粯鈷戦柟顖嗗懐顔婇梺纭呮珪閹稿墽鍒掗銏犵伋闁哄倶鍎查弬鈧梻浣虹帛閸旀牞銇愰崘顏嗘/鐟滄棃寮婚敐鍛傛棃宕橀妸鎰╁灲閺岋綁鏁愰崶褍骞嬪Δ鐘靛仜濞差厼顕i崼鏇炵閹艰揪绱曢妶璺衡攽閿涘嫬浜奸柛濠冪墵楠炴劙鎳¢妶鍥╃厯闂佺懓顕崑鐔笺€呴弻銉︾厽闁逛即娼ф晶顖炴煕濞嗗繒绠插ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑饪伴崘銊ょ帛濠电偛鐡ㄧ划鎾剁不閺嶎厼绠栨俊銈傚亾妞ゎ偅绻堥幃娆擃敆閳ь剟顢旈敓锟� | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌嶉埡浣告殲闁绘繃娲熷缁樻媴閽樺-鎾绘煥濮橆厹浜滈柨鏃囶嚙閺嬨倗绱掓潏銊︻棃鐎殿喗鎸抽幃銏ゆ惞閸︻厽顫岄梻鍌欑劍閻綊宕归挊澶呯細鐟滃秹鎮洪銏♀拻濞达絿鎳撻婊勭箾閹绘帞绠荤€规洘鍔曢埞鎴犫偓锝庝簽閻f椽鎮峰⿰鍕叆闁伙絿鍏樺畷锟犳倷閳哄倻鈧妫呴銏$カ缂佹煡绠栬棢闁跨喓濮甸埛鎴︽煠婵劕鈧洖鐡繝鐢靛仩椤曟粍淇婇崶鈺佸灊濠电姴娲ょ粻缁樸亜閺冨洤浜归柛婵囶殕缁绘稓鈧數枪瀛濆銈嗗灥濡繈骞冮敓鐘冲亜闂傗偓閹邦喚鐣炬俊鐐€栭悧妤冨枈瀹ュ绠氶柛顐犲灮绾惧ジ鏌e▎鎰噧婵炶绠撻幃鈥斥枎閹惧鍘遍棅顐㈡处濞叉牜鏁捄琛℃斀妞ゆ棁鍋愭晶娑氱磼缂佹ḿ娲撮柟铏箞閺屽洭鏁冮埀顒€鈻撻銏♀拺閻庡湱濯ḿ鎰版煕閵娿儳绉洪柛鈹惧亾濡炪倖甯掗敃锔剧矓閻㈠憡鐓曢悗锛卞啩澹曢梻鍌欑缂嶅﹪寮ㄩ崡鐑嗘富濞寸姴顑呴拑鐔兼煥濠靛棭妲归柛瀣姍閺屾稖绠涢幘鏉戞畬闂佺硶鏅涢幊妯侯潖濞差亜宸濆┑鐘插暟閸欏棝姊洪崗鍏笺仧闁搞劌鐖煎畷娲閻欌偓閸氬顭跨捄鐚村姛闁汇倐鍋撻梻鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨瀛樺亱闊洦绋戦崒銊╂煟閵忕姵鍟為柍閿嬪灴閺屾稑鈽夊鍫濅紣闂佽绻掗崰鏍蓟濞戞瑧绡€闁告劦浜滈埛鍫ユ⒑闁偛鑻晶顖炴煟閺冩垵澧存鐐茬箻閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� | 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤濠€閬嶅焵椤掑倹鍤€閻庢凹鍙冨畷宕囧鐎c劋姹楅梺鍦劋閸ㄥ綊宕愰悙鐑樺仭婵犲﹤鍟扮粻鑽も偓娈垮枟婵炲﹪寮崘顔肩<婵炴垶鑹鹃獮鍫熶繆閻愵亜鈧倝宕㈡禒瀣瀭闁割煈鍋嗛々鍙夌節闂堟侗鍎愰柣鎾存礃缁绘盯宕卞Δ鍐唺缂備胶濮撮…鐑藉蓟閳ュ磭鏆嗛柍褜鍓熷畷浼村箻閼告娼熼梺鍦劋椤ㄥ懘锝為崨瀛樼厽婵☆垵娅i敍宥吤瑰⿰搴濈敖缂佽鲸鎹囧畷鎺戔枎閹烘垵甯┑鐘愁問閸o絿绮婚弽顓熸櫜闁绘劖娼欑欢鐐烘煙闁箑鍔﹂柨鏇炲€归悡鏇㈡煛閸ャ儱濡奸柣蹇曞Х缁辨帡鎮╁畷鍥ㄥ垱闂佸搫鏈惄顖炪€侀弴銏℃櫜闁糕剝鐟Σ鐗堜繆閻愵亜鈧洘顨ラ崫銉х煋闁荤喖鍋婂ḿ鏍煣韫囨挻璐¢柣顓熺懄缁绘盯宕卞Ο鍝勫Б闂佸憡鎸鹃崑鎾舵崲濞戞埃鍋撳☉娆嬬細闁活厹鍊曢湁婵犲﹤绨肩花缁樸亜閺囶亞鎮奸柟椋庡Т闇夐悗锝庡亽濞兼棃姊绘笟鈧ḿ褏鎹㈤幒鎾村弿闁割偁鍎辨儫闂佹寧妫佸銊ц姳婵犳碍鈷戦柛婵嗗閳ь剚鎮傞幃妯衡攽閸垻顦梺鍝勭Р閸斿秹宕h箛娑欏仭婵炲棗绻愰瀛樼箾閸喓鐭掗柡宀€鍠栭、娆撴偂鎼粹懣鈺佄斿Δ濠佺胺闁告鍟块悾鐑藉Ω閳哄﹥鏅i悷婊冮琚欏鑸靛姈閳锋垶鎱ㄩ悷鐗堟悙闁绘帗妞介弻娑㈠Ω閳衡偓閹查箖鏌曢崱妤€鏆炵紒缁樼箞瀹曟帡濡堕崨顕呭悪闂傚倷绀侀幖顐ゆ偖椤愶箑纾块弶鍫氭櫇娑撳秹鏌i悢绋挎珵鐟滅増甯楅弲鏌ユ煕濞戝崬鏋︾痪顓涘亾闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犳偡閵夈儙娑樷攽閸♀晜缍庨梺鎯х箰濠€杈╁閸忛棿绻嗘い鏍ㄧ箓閸氳銇勯敂鍝勫姦婵﹨娅g划娆撳礌閳ュ厖绱f繝鐢靛Л閸嬫捇姊洪鈧粔鎾倿閸偁浜滈柟鍝勭Х閸忓矂鏌涢悢鍝ュ弨闁哄瞼鍠栧畷娆撳Χ閸℃浼� |
Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )
GMT+8, 2025-1-20 08:40
Powered by ScienceNet.cn
Copyright © 2007-2025 中国科学报社