Recently, I have posted a blog article* concerning some general topic I touched earlier ( last year ?). This time is an updated one. There is a dozen of comments, agreed or not; some recommended their own blog articles by links, some expressed their opinions, as one normally see on a blog. But, one of them used a bitter phrase of  attack anonymously. I think he took something I had said over seriously. By seeing the time stamp, I infer that he is used to getting up early. Whatever, I was flattered. (I did not  attack in return, but asked for something he valued).

As for the flock mail here, I more and more take it as something like `blog by email'. Sometimes, I feel it is amusing to imagine the banner of the flock mail showing up in the inboxes all over the world from time to time. I also imagine that the banner appears occasionally side by side with the `official' one. You got it.

Writing is interesting. You start it for some reason, but more and more you go somewhere not planed. By writing, you re-input the outputs of your mind. On and on, you get a `result', just like experiments. The point is to hold on. `Do not stop. Something will happen', I read somewhere. After writing three or four lines, switch to a new paragraph. And, write down whatever comes to your mind.

Light can hardly be seen in the light; darkness plays a role. ‘Prizes are not a big deal; justice does matter’. `Be yourself'. Well, this is not the matter I expressed in the blog article. There, my major point is that, one cannot be failed by persuing the `Lights' and `Arts'. It's not a contradiction to what I had expressed on the topic earlier (last year ?), but beyond that.

Obscure vs illuminating writing is of `complementary'. But, few authors bother about that. There are more like this. Trust vs untrust each other, be equal vs be unequal to each other, silence vs unsilence...What make people love prizes?  People would look at you in a way you feel comfortable. Why not do that directly, then?

At the earlier stage of the flock mail, some `Chief' transfered a comment, saying I behaved like a `God', among other things. He was informed that in a meeting outside his city. So, I inferred that the guy was his friend in a southern city. Later, I got a email from someone on the list. I knew it's him, judging by some keywords in the `other things'. Later, I turned into another mode. And, he quitted after a while. He was friendly, I think. Remember the `coarse china bowl with bule flower' ?  Should be around that period.  

Maybe, it's better to behave like a `God', isn't it ?