waterlilyqd的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/waterlilyqd 翻译--编辑--信息分析从平凡中见神奇! Journal of Mountain Science科学网博客

博文

My comments in the old version of sciencenet blog(II)

已有 3117 次阅读 2011-1-18 00:18 |个人分类:Life and Fun|系统分类:科研笔记

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:[转载] Word中自动生成目录和图标目录  

评论内容:

It's really very useful!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:通向成功的捷径 Shortcuts to success 

评论内容:

Persist in doing as the article says!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:知耻近勇:如何对自己不抛弃不放弃? 

评论内容:

知耻近勇!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:夜光蘑菇-Discovery News 

评论内容:

Desjardin认为,这些真菌具有发荧光的能力的目的是吸引动物替它们散播孢子, 这与果实能够使植物得以传播其种子的道理非常相似。博主回复:thx

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:[转载]中国百家姓的英文翻译 

评论内容:

why not using Pinyin?

博主回复:I dont know.

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:我的第一篇Scientometrics文章 

评论内容:

can i have a copy of this article? if possible, please send it to my email--waterlilyqd@yahoo.com.cn. Thanks very much!

博主回复:you can down the paper from this blog, the URL is http://www.sciencenet.cn/upload/blog/file/2010/1/201015205448177403.pdf , thanks!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:费城一年 

评论内容:

要尽量保持平和从容的心态, 无论在什么环境下!

博主回复:嗯 谢谢!!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:[转载]看美国人怎么评价我们中国人? 

评论内容:

This report lists so many shortcomings that many Chinese have, but in fact, We Chinese have many merits that the American don't possess!.

So the company didn't give a just evaluation on Chinese!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:我把《博客》撕碎了 

评论内容:

Could you please tell me the English name of this book?

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:我把《博客》撕碎了 

评论内容:

Translation needs long term hard work and earnest attitude!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:“科学×新闻”讲习班招生 一线新闻人免费授课 

评论内容:

将相关内容放到网上则可以让更多的人看到!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:科学网招聘市场总监、市场经理  

评论内容:

will the marketing manager expand the business at home or abroad?

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:没有Google,中国的科学家会怎样?请看Nature的调查 

评论内容:

I use Google scholar often for primary retrieval of research papers, then I get the needed papers in a literature database!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:如何进行会议准备? 

评论内容:

如何进行会议准备

为准备会议花的时间是不会浪费的。确信正确的人于适当的时间、适当的地点前来参加会议,并确认他们能作出正确的决定。

1.要考虑与会者在群体合作状况下的工作情况。

2.决定开会时间前要先考虑交通时间。

3.如果人们不能出席则应该重新安排会议。

4.在议程各个项目旁列出发言人姓名。

5.要避免在低效能时间开会,如午餐刚结束后。

6.任何议程变动都必须通知主持人。

7.议程要尽可能短小简单。

8.尽量将议程限制于一页纸上。

9.最重要的事应该安排在议程的前面,要趁与会者精神状态最好时讨论。

10.要考虑须长途跋涉赶来开会的人所花的时间。

11.要确保有向残疾与会者提供便利条件的设施。

12.必须将电话转移出会场。

13.将有可能出问题的会议安排在中立地开。

14.要求你的后勤人员核实会场当地公共交通的线路站点、运行时刻表和季节变化。

15.要找个确保没有干扰的会场。

16.要考虑多种座位方案后再选择最合适的一种。

17.使用圆桌可使会议定调为非正式。

18.务必使全体与会者既能看见又能被看见。

19.座位之间应有一臂长的间隔。

20.不能让与会者受太阳直接曝晒。

21.要求与会者关闭移动电话和传呼机。

22.不要用很舒服的椅子,以防与会者打瞌睡。

23.开会前要检查所有的视听辅助是否完好。

24.要谨防会场过度提供酒菜牟取额外利润。

25.要确保特殊饮食在需要时能有供应。

26.会前不要喝太多酒,酒很难提高工作效率。

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:怎样获得文献全文 

评论内容:

thanks. It's very useful and these days I have uses these methods to get many needed literature

博主回复:You are welcome.

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:中国农业科学研究:30年河东,30年河西 

评论内容:

很多老一代的科学家都很重视到第一线去进行调查研究!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:河南:这个女人不寻常! 

评论内容:

原来补贴种粮农民的钱都进了某些利益集团和官员的腰包!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:《逆向思辨—点击中国农业科学》出版 

评论内容:

一个有良知的农业科技人员的深刻体会!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:质疑:万亩玉米亩产超吨粮? 

评论内容:

为了迎合某些人的需要, 数据怎么统计似乎都是合理的!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:转载:汤姆森公司SCI/SSCI的选刊流程以及选刊标准 

评论内容:

Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition (2002) :http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_self_citation_jcr/

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:网上流传的新版官场段子!绝了!(转贴仅供娱乐) 

评论内容:

精辟!

标题:评价指标的个数多少为好? 

评论内容:

You are right--granted patent quantity can reflect the creativity of one unit of province. However,from the patent application quantity, we can also make some valuable conclusion--usually the patent application quantity and granted patent quantity are in positive proportion, and those provinces with more patent application quantity perhaps have more stimulative measures on patent application.

博主回复:您说得对。但是,在什么指标都有泡沫的情况下,要选泡沫少一点的。

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:SCI收录期刊查询网站  

评论内容:

I upload this page here just for future convenience!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:Some thoughts on “如何将高水平论文发表在我国国内期刊上?” 

评论内容:

Poeple don't want to have their high quality papers published in Chinese journals for several reasons: One, Most Chinese journals are not sci-indexed; Two, all sci-indexed Chinese journals have low impact factors; Three,too many people submit their papers to the limited Chinese journals and thus the publication period is very long; Four, Most Chinese journals ask for publication fee.

博主回复:Thanks for your comments. I take it "the Chinese journals" mean journals in both Chinese and English. So, the bottom line is "population problem" in addition to policy.

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:当科研不再有奖励 

评论内容:

视野决定高度。But incentive mechanism on scientific workers is very important guiding tool!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:当科研不再有奖励 

评论内容:

The picture is very beautiful!

评论人:waterlilyqd

标题:Your good friend is only a click away … 

评论内容:

I also added some "good friends" but only a few responded. It's okay to just read their articles whether they added me or not. You can read their new blogs through"好友动态"!  



https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-314423-405355.html

上一篇:My comments in the old version of sciencenet blog(I)
下一篇:My comment in the old version of sciencenet blog(IV)
收藏 IP: 210.75.233.*| 热度|

0

发表评论 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-29 13:51

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部