“I invariably took the first rank in all discussions and exercises, whether public or private, as not only my teachers testified, but also the printed congratulations and carmina of my classmates.” So wrote Leibniz about his own classroom performance. Reverse everything Leibniz wrote and you have a fairly accurate picture of my classroom performance at the University of Chicago. None among my teachers there ever suggested that I had intellectual promise. Nor should they have done, for I didn’t show any, not even to myself. I made no “A”s. I wrote no brilliant papers. I didn’t do especially well on exams. I was not quick in response in the classroom.

Only years later did I realize that quickness of response —on which 95 percent of education is based—is beside the point, and is required only of politicians, emergency-room physicians, lawyers in courtrooms, and salesmen. Serious intellectual effort requires slow, usually painstaking thought, often with wrong roads taken along the way to the right destination, if one is lucky enough to arrive there. One of the hallmarks of the modern educational system, which is essentially an examination system, is that so much of it is based on quick response solely. Give 6 reasons for the decline of Athens, 8 for the emergence of the Renaissance, 12 for the importance of the French Revolution. You have 20 minutes in which to do so.

Exerpt from

Who Killed the Liberal Arts?And why we should care

BY JOSEPH EPSTEIN

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/who-killed-liberal-arts_652007.html?nopager=1

相关专题：读书荐书
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自房松科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-286797-680013.html

上一篇：Selected English readings for recitation: Von Neumann
下一篇：Selected readings for recitation: KEVIN KELLY