上周科学杂志刊发了一篇文章介绍science杂志社网站新开发的一个网站

http://myidp.sciencecareers.org. 科学杂志在敏锐嗅探到科学研究职业化的今天，社会以及高校研究机构在引导新晋毕业的博士生们以及博士后走上正轨的学术道路有着缺陷，或者这一块基本缺失（ps：这一块在国内尤甚）。凡事预则立，学术生涯也一样，美国一些机构和高校陆续要求博士生和博后们入职时提供个人发展规划IDP，但远不够普及，科学杂志通过自己的影响力，利用日益发达的网络建立了一个面向学术新人（当然老人也能应用）自我学术评估规划网站http://myidp.sciencecareers.org。

注册用户进入后可以看到以下界面内容，包括：总评，技能评估，兴趣评估，价值评估，工作拓展，工作适应性，并可以与其它用户交流，以及学术目标的定制。一切在用户使用过程中均有先辈组成团体进行互动、反馈和评估（见下面文字和图片，文章全文因版权未提供，只提供summary）。不断清晰化自己的career！

·         Overview

o    Overview Summary

o    Personal Information

·         Assessment

o    Skills Assessment

o    Interests Assessment

o    Values Assessment

·         Career Exploration

o    Consider Career Fit

o    Read About Careers

o    Attend Events

o    Talk to People

o    Choose a Career Path

·         Set Goals

o    Career Advancement Goals

o    Skill Goals

o    Project Goals

·         Implement Plan

o    Mentoring Team

o    myIDP Summary

 

Science 7 September 2012: 
Vol. 337 no. 6099 p. 1149 
DOI: 10.1126/science.1226552

Planning Career Paths for Ph.D.s

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6099/1149.summaryJim Austin¹, 

1.        Bruce Alberts²

1.        ¹Jim Austin is Editor of Science Careers.

2.        ²Bruce Alberts is Editor-in-Chief of Science.

There was a time not so long ago when new Science Ph.D.s in the United States were expected to pursue a career path in academia. But today, most graduates end up working outside academia, not only in industry but also in careers such as science policy, communications, knowledge brokering, and patent law.* Partly this is a result of how bleak the academic job market is, but there is also a rising awareness of career options that Ph.D. scientists haven't trained for directly—but for which they have useful knowledge, skills, and experience. Still, “there is a huge disconnect between how we currently train scientists and the actual employment opportunities available for them,”† and an urgent need for dramatic improvements in training programs to help close the gap. One critical step that could help to drive change would be to require Ph.D. students and postdoctoral scientists to follow an individual development plan (IDP).

·         ↵* National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2012, Table 3-20 (www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c3/tt03-20.htm).

·         ↵† M. Rosenberg, ASBMB Today, August 2012 (www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=17458).

·         ↵‡ http://myidp.sciencecareers.org.

转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自李力强科学网博客。
链接地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-241376-612360.html

上一篇：《2006年事业单位工资改革后工资标准表》尼玛，好复杂！
下一篇：博士生薪酬制浙江大学开了个好头！